Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "expandinop_store".
2008 Sep 30
2
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
All the sub methods called inside ExpandIntegerOperand like
ExpandInOp_STORE etc have access to the expanded operands map.
Why they aren't passed to target LowerOperation? A target may also want
to use the already expanded Lo and Hi parts.
- Sanjiv
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/piper...
2008 Sep 30
0
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:48 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote:
> All the sub methods called inside ExpandIntegerOperand like ExpandInOp_STORE
> etc have access to the expanded operands map.
>
> Why they aren't passed to target LowerOperation? A target may also want to
> use the already expanded Lo and Hi parts.
You don't really need access to the map; just use build an
EXTRACT_ELEMENT node, and legalize will take car...
2008 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] Type Legalizer Question.
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:48 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote:
> > All the sub methods called inside ExpandIntegerOperand like
> ExpandInOp_STORE
> > etc have access to the expanded operands map.
> >
> > Why they aren't passed to target LowerOperation? A target may also
want
> to
> > use the already expanded Lo and Hi parts.
>
> You don't really need access to the map; just use build an
> EXTRACT_...