Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "expacts".
Did you mean:
exacts
2014 Jan 11
2
Multitab GUI SSH clilent found
Hi.
I just wanted to notify all that I found very nice GUI SSH client at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pacmanager/
It has rpm packages and works very nice. Multi-tab, Expact support,
connections tree, connection , user and password saving (I know they
should not be saved).
Only manual download as far as I know, no repository caries it.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL
2007 Feb 28
1
On PostScript
I have been attempting to create a custom fax cover sheet for a hylafax
web front end called avantfax. It requires as input an encapsulated
postscript file conaining the glyph definitions and the text to be
subsituted as strings having the form XXXX-to-variable or
XXXX-from-variable.
I have been trying to create a valid eps file using a varitiy of methods
with no great succes. However, I ahve
2017 Jul 23
3
Strange Error: Password data is not valid for scheme SHA256. Please help me resolve it.
Hello,
I am using version 2.2.31 (65cde28) on an Ubuntu 16.04 VPS.
I am attempting to setup a mail server using a flat file system as an
experiment.
I am able to send e-mail from external domain names and the messages
land in my /var/mail/vmail/domain/user/ directories.
I am trying to setup Thunderbird as an MUA using the information I
generated on my VPS namely the IMAP server, username
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the
> bullseye-backports.
>
> I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors.
>
On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one I'm
having the provlem.
> As like 9.16 I use the
2017 Jul 23
0
Strange Error: Password data is not valid for scheme SHA256. Please help me resolve it.
...32)]" mean? I assume that there is some kind
> of a mismatch between the way I generated the password with doveadm and
> entered it in passwd.db and the way I entered the non-hashed password
> into the password field in the new account section of Thunderbird.
It means that dovecot expacts to verify a 32 byte long password hash.
What it detects has a size of 0 byte. You haven't shown an example line
of your passwd.db file, but I would guess you build it up not correct.
See
https://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes
Alexander
2019 Jan 29
1
autenticate squid via samba 4
Hi,
Howto autenticate squid3 via samba 4, what i need to do in samba 4
samba 4.9.4
squid 3.5.23
Debian 9.7
2017 Jul 23
1
Strange Error: Password data is not valid for scheme SHA256. Please help me resolve it.
...e is
>> some kind of a mismatch between the way I generated the password
>> with doveadm and entered it in passwd.db and the way I entered the
>> non-hashed password into the password field in the new account
>> section of Thunderbird.
>
> It means that dovecot expacts to verify a 32 byte long password
> hash. What it detects has a size of 0 byte. You haven't shown an
> example line of your passwd.db file, but I would guess you build it
> up not correct.
>
> See
>
> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes
>
> A...
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that.
I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with
bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors.
Regards
Ingo
https://github.com/WAdama
Stefan Kania via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:47:
>
>
> Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> I have exact that running:
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Hi Stefan,
I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the
bullseye-backports.
I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors.
As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf.
If you need further information to compare just ask.
Regards
Ingo
https://github.com/WAdama
Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um