Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "execute_shader".
2009 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
...llvm::DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatResult(llvm::SDNode*, unsigned int): Assertion `0 && "Do not know how to soften the result of this operator!"' failed.
> Stack dump:
> 0. Program arguments: llc
> 1. Running pass 'ARM Instruction Selection' on function '@execute_shader'
> Aborted
this is now fixed.
Ciao,
Duncan.
2009 Apr 08
4
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
...s.cpp:54: void llvm::DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenFloatResult(llvm::SDNode*, unsigned int): Assertion `0 && "Do not know how to soften the result of this operator!"' failed.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: llc
1. Running pass 'ARM Instruction Selection' on function '@execute_shader'
Aborted
All of these errors can ofcourse be experienced on other architectures
as well when generating .S files for arm using
llc -march=arm
There was some tests failing for the ExecutionEngine yet i am uncertain
if it is a error since i it fails on X86 as well like this one:
http://labb....
2009 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
...eLegalizer::SoftenFloatResult(llvm::SDNode*, unsigned int): Assertion `0 && "Do not know how to soften the result of this operator!"' failed.
>> Stack dump:
>> 0. Program arguments: llc
>> 1. Running pass 'ARM Instruction Selection' on function '@execute_shader'
>> Aborted
>>
>
> this is now fixed.
>
> Ciao,
>
> Duncan.
>
Great work Duncan!
I recompiled llvm and restested the failing softenfloat tests on my machine:
2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll
OK!
vector-constantexpr.ll
OK!
vector-constantexpr.ll
OK!
llvm-a...
2009 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
LLVM ARM v6 backend is in fairly good shape. Even the JIT passes
nearly the entire llvm test suite. There are some known missing bits:
1. Exception handling
2. Atomic
Not sure:
3. Debugging support (should be trivial to hook up if it's not done)
Also the thumb backend is not awesome. Its performance is not great.
Evan
On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Robert Schuster wrote:
> Hi,
> the
2009 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
Hi,
the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I
learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of
LLVM is generally in its early stages of development.
I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to
be unstable and the like.
Thanks in advance for taking the time.
Regards
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A