search for: examlpe

I''m preety new at RoR (and programming), I tried a few tutorials, and really like the RoR simplicity, but my knowledge of the framework still isn''t very good (to be true, i understand the basics, but not everything that''s in the tutorials). But still I''d like to create a website which has: - front end interface (with no edit functions) - admin interface

...ssible using the rubytree that is a gem.I have require that gem too but i am not getting the graphical representation of the directories structure where in we can save or retrive the documents.If anybody Knows about this plz reply me as soon as possible. It willbe well and good if i get a practical examlpe or code for this. Thank you in advance.Hope to get the reply fast.thanxs. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to thi...

...OK up to here and I could continue using this model example? > How would code evaluation > distributed to multiple hosts benefit anyone? For me it sounds like: "do we need distributed computations at all?" oh... could we take this as axiom?.. :-) anyway, if you accept this model examlpe above we could see how it really could work. > The two programs only communicate via a network connection. > The only places you can optimize that network connection are > in (a) the kernel and (b) the application. > Case (a) is outside the scope of LLVM and case (b) is supported by...

My $0.02 worth on this topic .. I'm also interested in distributed computing as XPL/XPS will support it. However, I find it unreasonable to expect LLVM to provide any features in this area. In order to do anything meaningful, LLVM would have to have some kind of awareness of networks (typically an operating system concern). That seems at odds with the "low level" principles of

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 9:37:19 PM, you wrote: > > Well, Chris, let's forget about traditions (finally LLVM is > tradition-breaking thing!). At which level the optimization like i've > meant *should* be implemented?.. Ok, I thought you were concerned about LLVM breaking the _correctness_ of distributed programs, sorry. :)

...u described above (again, on a single physical computer). > oh... could we take this as axiom?.. :-) I would accept "we need parallel computation support" as an axiom. I don't think Chris will disagree, but I'll let him chime in on that. > anyway, if you accept this model examlpe above we could > see how it really could work. Sure .. > > > The two programs only communicate via a network connection. > > The only places you can optimize that network connection are > > in (a) the kernel and (b) the application. > > Case (a) is outside the sc...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1346 Summary: PAM environment takes precedence over SendEnv Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: