search for: exactomundo

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "exactomundo".

Did you mean: exactamundo
2005 May 11
2
SATA RAID on CentOS!
From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic at pbl.ca> > I believe Intel 865 uses ICH5? If so, it is a sofware RAID emulation in > BIOS. You do not have RAID in hardware. It's just a marketing trick > that has nothing to do with reality. Exactomundo. Even AHCI is still software-driven. It is my sincerest hope that the term "FRAID" (or something else) catches on to describe this "Free RAID" / "trick BIOS" approach. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org
2005 May 20
0
Re: iptables port forwarding -- name resolution and not forwarding/routing?
...or my > domain (it is listed as Primary, no secondaries, for my domain). > Internally, mail.hughesjr.com has the internal address .... externally > it real address. > Internal clients point to the internal DNS server (and internal IP) ... > external clients point to the external IP. Exactomundo. In many cases, it's not a fowarding/routing issue, but a name resolution issue. Private systems are resolving to public addresses, and you want to intercept those from ever reaching a public DNS server. That way you can replace the public name/IP everyone else sees with just the private name...
2005 May 26
1
Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
...h the application versions > but hold back more than RH on the kernel changes. And that's the real question. What is the "best balance"? > Of course they'll have it easy for the first few since they don't have to > be backwards compatible to a huge installed base. Exactomundo! ;-> In reality, Red Hat has probably the longest "backward compatible" run of any vendor. Why? Because they adopt things early -- like GLibC 2, GCC 3, NPTL, etc... Heck, pretty much everything released for CL/EL2 (GLibC 2.2, GCC 2.96/3.0 -- RHL7.x/RHEL2.1) still runs on my latest...