search for: evolving

Hello, HP offers BIOS firmware updates. After applying these to an affected server, Xen Hypervisor starts normally. -- Regards, Andreas Haase [zu unserer Webseite]<http://www.evolver.de/> Unsere Top-Produkte: ? evolverOAS<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolveroas/> ? evolverCMS<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolvercms/> ?

...same arguments to the DTRACE_* macros that mark the probe locations, and (b) Establish the appropriate provider stability, which is done by #pragma D attributes after the provider foo { } declaration. Here is an example set of declarations from plockstat in libc: #pragma D attributes Evolving/Evolving/ISA provider plockstat provider #pragma D attributes Private/Private/Unknown provider plockstat module #pragma D attributes Private/Private/Unknown provider plockstat function #pragma D attributes Evolving/Evolving/ISA provider plockstat name #pragma D attributes Evolving/Evolving/ISA prov...

...n for the variable *keys*, however, using ScalarEvolution I also get an expression (using SE->getSCEV) for *knodes*. Since *knodes* does not evolve in terms of the loop induction variable I wasn't expecting to receive a SCEV expression for it. Can anyone please point out how SCEV expressions evolving in terms of the loop induction variable can be distinguished from expressions that are not. -Hashim University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171201/77fee89a...

..., however, > using ScalarEvolution I also get an expression > (using SE->getSCEV) for *knodes*. Since *knodes* does not evolve in terms > of the loop induction variable I wasn't expecting to receive a SCEV > expression for it. Can anyone please point out how SCEV expressions > evolving in terms of the loop induction variable > can be distinguished from expressions that are not. > > -Hashim > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > ht...

On 6 November 2013 11:02, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Except that there hasn't been warning at all. The only "warning" is > that "we're going to upgrade to some new toolchain." We need to know > *exactly* which toolchain that is so we can test all of our software > against it. "4.7.x" doesn't help because every point release has new

...We use Phabricator to get patches reviewed and this implies that new commits should be based on what we post there. If master has evolved significantly since the review, then a patch update should be sent to Phabricator anyway for further review. Also tests must be run again while master continues evolving. Ultimately, the commit that gets sent to Github must be strictly based on what we got reviewed on Phabricator. My procedure only attempts to enforce that the ‘delta’ commit that I push is predictable, and exactly the one that I previously posted on Phabricator. The procedure stated on the docs...

Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> writes: > I think there are two main problems here: > 1. People use trunk on side-projects because releases mean very little > in LLVM world > 2. We start adding new stuff as soon as a release is branched, and > that reduces warnings up to a few days > > We're all talking about problem 2, when in fact, I think the problem

...rda files in my data dir, but also a rather large sqlite db. Is R trying to do anything in particular to my data during the install? index or something? Is there anything I can do to make this step go faster? If this were a 1-time install, it wouldn't matter, but since this package is evolving as I'm using it, I find myself constantly needing to tweak some code here, or change something there, and this always requires another round of R CMD INSTALLing ... Is there something I can do to make this cycle turn around quicker? How do you guys deal with growing a package organically...

...------------------------------------------------------------------- Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

I recently found that Halo was not properly displaying menu and other 2D items in any color except black. I didn't have this problem until I upgraded to wine 1.3.24. I use Fedora 14 with ATI Radeon HD. Here is a screenshot [img]http://i44.tinypic.com/2946gbs.jpg[/img] I think it has something to do with ATI proprietary driver conflict, since I can run in another PC with nVidia and it displays

Hey im having trouble with directx. 9 I have a black and gray models in portal and halo combat evolve. OS:Ubuntu 11.10 RAM:1.5 GFX:Intel gma 900 NOTE: portal and halo combat evolve do work in a windows OS, So do not say it wont run. RES:1024x768 Screen shot of bug: http://s1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa405/se7enjojo/?action=view&current=Screenshotat2011-12-02170852.png

bump? Any idea how to tackle this dark text and dark hud problem? I updated amd/ati catalyst to latest 12.1, and wine to 1.3.37, but won't fix the problem. Here is the image again. [Image: http://i44.tinypic.com/2946gbs.jpg ]

I am also having the same issue. I have upgraded to the latest wine in the Ubuntu repositories (1.3 beta), but that doesn't fix the issue and makes things worse my messing up my sound... anyway, here is the log file created as was requested in a previous post: http://pastebin.com/Fv2rfh6C The 1.4 RC is not available through the repos...at least not the repos I have. I'm not going to cry

Hi Jason, The long discussion made me wondering where this was going, but re-reading you original email [0], there was an acknowledgment of a potential future merge between the projects, and I can of make sense of the current picture. So you can forget about my question below! [0]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096576.html

Dear NUT users, The relationship with Eaton was in need of clarification for a long time, which happened over the past weeks.This is now officially noted on the NUT side, through moving Eaton from the "Main supporter" to "Supporting UPS manufacturer", rewording the content and putting a big warning [1]. Quoting these main changes: "Eaton, has been the main NUT supporter

...re preparing to migrate our mail server to Azure and would like to integrate it vi AD Connect with our AD - Samba 4.7 upgrading to 4.11 (Thanks Louis!). Anyone willing to share the experience? I see on some not-so-old posts there is a problem syncing password hashes, but since samba is an ever evolving solution I would like to know how are you dealing with this? Thanks and best regards. -- *Marcio Merlone*

...------------------------------------------------------------------- Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> wrote: > Now I suppose your going to respond with that immature drivel that's been floating around, lets see if I remember it: > >> Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> > Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> >> Top-posting. >>

Hello everyone, The LLVM project has evolved significantly since our first public release in Oct. 2003. Most importantly, we've gained many new users and several active contributors, and we want to encourage and support them and attract more. At the same time, the software itself has undergone some significant changes and improvements, and been ported to new platforms. We expect that

On 15/02/14 19:56, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Dear NUT users, > > The relationship with Eaton was in need of clarification for a long > time, which happened over the past weeks.This is now officially noted > on the NUT side, through moving Eaton from the "Main supporter" to > "Supporting UPS manufacturer", rewording the content and putting a big > warning