search for: evolvability

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1575 matches for "evolvability".

2015 Jul 17
0
Bug#782383: Panic: "System without CMOS RTC must be booted from EFI" i.c.w. HP servers
Hello, HP offers BIOS firmware updates. After applying these to an affected server, Xen Hypervisor starts normally. -- Regards, Andreas Haase [zu unserer Webseite]<http://www.evolver.de/> Unsere Top-Produkte: ? evolverOAS<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolveroas/> ? evolverCMS<http://www.evolver.de/produkte/evolvercms/> ?
2007 Oct 08
0
Translators and multiply defined probenames]
> I have a code that has several probes with the same probename. When I define the probe to use a translator and then try to match for all the occurances of the probename in a D script I get the following error: > > dtrace: invalid probe specifier mpi__test$target:::RECV_REQ_ACT_EV { printf("%d %d", args[0]->bar, args[0]->baz); }: in action list: args[ ] may not be
2017 Dec 01
2
Using Scalar Evolution to Identify Expressions Evolving in terms of Loop induction variables
Hi, I am using Scalar Evolution to extract access expressions (for load and store instructions) in terms of the loop induction variables. I observe that the Scalar Evolution analysis is returning more expressions than I expect - including ones that are not defined in terms of the loop induction variable. For instance in the following code: for(unsigned long int bid = 0; bid < no_of_queries;
2017 Dec 01
0
Using Scalar Evolution to Identify Expressions Evolving in terms of Loop induction variables
Hi Hashim, Scalar evolution determines evolution of scalar in terms of expression chain driving it. Try dumping the detailed log using opt -analyze -scalar-evolution <.ll> -S , and look for LoopDispositions corresponding to different expression which shows variance characteristics of a particular expression w.r.t loop i.e. [computable/variant/invariant]. Thanks On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at
2013 Nov 06
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On 6 November 2013 11:02, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Except that there hasn't been warning at all. The only "warning" is > that "we're going to upgrade to some new toolchain." We need to know > *exactly* which toolchain that is so we can test all of our software > against it. "4.7.x" doesn't help because every point release has new
2019 Nov 10
2
Workflow to commit changes using git alone (?)
> On 10 Nov 2019, at 07:00, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > recipe is not correct in the absolute: the delta from master does not mean it contains exactly what you want, you seem to assume that master didn't evolve between the time "patchbranch" was created. > Hi Mehdi, I’m doing it this way to make sure that master /actually/ contains “exactly
2013 Nov 06
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> writes: > I think there are two main problems here: > 1. People use trunk on side-projects because releases mean very little > in LLVM world > 2. We start adding new stuff as soon as a release is branched, and > that reduces warnings up to a few days > > We're all talking about problem 2, when in fact, I think the problem
2009 Sep 15
2
Putting together a constantly evolving package
Hi all, I'm putting together some common code + data into a custom package, everything is working out fine, but the ``R CMD INSTALL MyPackage`` call seems to take a particularly long time in the "**data" step: $ R CMD INSTALL MyPackage/ * installing to library ?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/ library? * installing *source* package ? MyPackage? ... ** R ** data
2013 Nov 19
7
IPv6 connections won't be rejected nor logged
Hi, I have servers where shorewall6 won''t reject nor log: # cat /etc/shorewall6/zones fw firewall net ipv6 # cat /etc/shorewall6/interfaces net eth1 tcpflags (I also tried without "tcpflags", but no changes) # cat /etc/shorewall6/policy $FW all ACCEPT all all REJECT info # cat /etc/shorewall6/rules SECTION NEW (for testing, I removed all the rules) I am testing from
2011 Nov 01
0
Halo:Combat Evolved with black text and overhead
I recently found that Halo was not properly displaying menu and other 2D items in any color except black. I didn't have this problem until I upgraded to wine 1.3.24. I use Fedora 14 with ATI Radeon HD. Here is a screenshot [img]http://i44.tinypic.com/2946gbs.jpg[/img] I think it has something to do with ATI proprietary driver conflict, since I can run in another PC with nVidia and it displays
2011 Dec 03
4
directx 9 bug in games.
Hey im having trouble with directx. 9 I have a black and gray models in portal and halo combat evolve. OS:Ubuntu 11.10 RAM:1.5 GFX:Intel gma 900 NOTE: portal and halo combat evolve do work in a windows OS, So do not say it wont run. RES:1024x768 Screen shot of bug: http://s1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa405/se7enjojo/?action=view&current=Screenshotat2011-12-02170852.png
2012 Feb 17
1
Re: Halo:Combat Evolved with black text and overhead
bump? Any idea how to tackle this dark text and dark hud problem? I updated amd/ati catalyst to latest 12.1, and wine to 1.3.37, but won't fix the problem. Here is the image again. [Image: http://i44.tinypic.com/2946gbs.jpg ]
2012 Mar 24
1
Re: Halo:Combat Evolved with black text and overhead
I am also having the same issue. I have upgraded to the latest wine in the Ubuntu repositories (1.3 beta), but that doesn't fix the issue and makes things worse my messing up my sound... anyway, here is the log file created as was requested in a previous post: http://pastebin.com/Fv2rfh6C The 1.4 RC is not available through the repos...at least not the repos I have. I'm not going to cry
2016 Mar 28
5
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
Hi Jason, The long discussion made me wondering where this was going, but re-reading you original email [0], there was an acknowledgment of a potential future merge between the projects, and I can of make sense of the current picture. So you can forget about my question below! [0]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096576.html
2014 Feb 15
2
Formalizing the end of the relationship with Eaton
Dear NUT users, The relationship with Eaton was in need of clarification for a long time, which happened over the past weeks.This is now officially noted on the NUT side, through moving Eaton from the "Main supporter" to "Supporting UPS manufacturer", rewording the content and putting a big warning [1]. Quoting these main changes: "Eaton, has been the main NUT supporter
2020 Mar 30
6
Azure AD Connect
Hi, We are preparing to migrate our mail server to Azure and would like to integrate it vi AD Connect with our AD - Samba 4.7 upgrading to 4.11 (Thanks Louis!). Anyone willing to share the experience? I see on some not-so-old posts there is a problem syncing password hashes, but since samba is an ever evolving solution I would like to know how are you dealing with this? Thanks and best
2013 Nov 21
14
openvpn restart fails with dual entry in conntrack and wrong sourceport
the establishment of an openvpn link sometimes fails. I tracked it down to network traffic with wrong Sourceport in the answer packet (should be 1300 not 1024): 2 1.119309000 aaa.185.165 bbb.162.192 UDP 58 Source port: 1300 Destination port: 1300 3 1.119446000 bbb.162.192 aaa.185.165 UDP 66 Source port: 1024 Destination port: 1300 and a collateral entry in the connection tracking table
2014 Nov 08
0
RFC: new variable battery.status
On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> wrote: > Now I suppose your going to respond with that immature drivel that's been floating around, lets see if I remember it: > >> Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> > Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> >> Top-posting. >>
2005 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] Oversight group for LLVM
Hello everyone, The LLVM project has evolved significantly since our first public release in Oct. 2003. Most importantly, we've gained many new users and several active contributors, and we want to encourage and support them and attract more. At the same time, the software itself has undergone some significant changes and improvements, and been ported to new platforms. We expect that
2014 Feb 15
0
Formalizing the end of the relationship with Eaton
On 15/02/14 19:56, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Dear NUT users, > > The relationship with Eaton was in need of clarification for a long > time, which happened over the past weeks.This is now officially noted > on the NUT side, through moving Eaton from the "Main supporter" to > "Supporting UPS manufacturer", rewording the content and putting a big > warning