search for: evidences

I have a function "eval.delta" which does what I want but isn't very elegant. I have consulted the R documents, MASS, and S Programming. Is there a practical way to optimize the code? Thank you very much. Peter B. Function: eval.delta <- function(delta){ cat("VALUES\n") vlr <- NULL k <- 0 for(j in 1:length(delta)) if(delta[j] <= 2){

Try this: split(delta,cut(delta, breaks=c(0,2,4,7,10,max(delta)),include.lowest=T)) $"[0,2]" [1] 0.0 1.4 2.0 2.0 $"(2,4]" [1] 2.3 2.3 $"(4,7]" [1] 4.5 6.4 $"(7,10]" [1] 8.9 7.4 $"(10,12.4]" [1] 12.4 11.5 "Peter B. Mandeville" <mandevip at uaslp.mx>@stat.math.ethz.ch on 06/24/2002 13:11:41 Sent by: owner-r-help at

Hello, I have a program called "Evidence Scribe" it runs with .NET Whenever I try to run it I receive this: Code: blake at blake-desktop ~ $ env WINEPREFIX="/home/blake/.wine" wine "C:\Program Files\Idoneum\Evidence Scribe\Evidence Scribe.exe" fixme:gdiplus:GdipGetFontHeightGivenDPI Unhandled unit type: 3 Unhandled Exception: System.InvalidOperationException:

Hello, well, I searched list-archive, cran and the references, but found nothing. Thus: Does anybody around here know anything about Dempster-Shafer Theory, Evidence Theory or Hints in R? Has anybody stumbled about a package that I overlooked or implemented something in this area? I really would like to not implement a hint-model a second time. My apologies if I missed something obvious, but I

All, I am constructing a pharmacokinetic dataset and have hit a snag. The dataset can be demonstrated in the following way: myData <- data.frame( evid = c(1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0), time = 1:10, last.dose.time = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9) ) The evid field is an indicator variable for whether the associated observation is a dosing record (when it takes value 1) or an

On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/18/2016 02:49 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Fri, June 17, 2016 21:40, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html >> With respect citing another person's or people's opinion in support >> of >> your own is not evidence in the sense I understand the word to

On Mon, June 20, 2016 13:16, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> >>> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on >>> epistemology. >>> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the >>> world's foremost experts in the

Hi, I'm the Evidence Scribe developer. I've actually corresponded with the original poster about this and worked things out (I'm building a version specifically for Linux). moosehadly can verify that this problem has been solved if you need him to. Could a moderator delete this thread? The topic is "Can't run..." and it is showing up in Google results looking like

>>> Ted Harding <Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk> 14/07/2008 00:16 >>> >said: >What constitutes "reasonable doubt" can become a very interesting >question, but there are some crimes for which it has a definite >statistical interpretation Warning for potential courtgoers: "reasonable doubt" NEVER has a direct statistical interpretation in a

So, I've managed to consistently lock up my Cisco 7960 (SIP 6.1) to the point where it needs to be unplugged, due to software errors. This is a first. My suspicions are that this bug in Asterisk is causing the lockups: http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000889 It seems unusual to me that a low volume of bogus SIP messages should lock up the 7960, but that seems to be the

I was shocked at what I found. Files I shredded months earlier were clearly visible using this software. It's a fact Did you know......... For example that every click you make on Windows 98 Start Menu is logged and stored for ever on a hidden encrypted database within your own computer? your PC is keeping frightening records of both your online and off-line activity. Evidence Eliminator.

Part I. The original LangRef appeared to be “nice and pretty” and originally ‘undef’ did not seem to stick out. Then evidence came to light in the form of bug reports, and in the form of Dan Gohman’s email “the nsw story”, that all was not good for ‘undef’ [1,2]. A proposal was made based on that evidence. A presentation was made at an llvm gathering. A paper was written. The proposal has even

Hi, I asked this question before, which was hidden in a bunch of questions. I repharse it here and hope I can get some help this time: I have 2 contingency tables which have the same group variable Y. I want to compare the strength of association between X1/Y and X2/Y. I am not sure if comparing p-values IS the way even though the probability of seeing such "weird" observation under H0

http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/go.shtml?A654710 You're in Serious Trouble - It's a Proven Fact! Deleting "Internet Cache and History" will NOT protect you because any of the Web Pages, Pictures, Movies, Videos, Sounds, E-mail, Chat Logs and Everything Else you see or do could easily be recovered to Haunt you forever! How would you feel if a snoop made this information

Hi, I probably found a minor security hole (as it may be IMHO) in my (latest) stable release of SAMBA (2.2.9a-1) Using Win98SE I am logging to Samba server. I am using root preexec and root postexec on Home share's to maintain a list of "correctly logged" users. When a Windows workstation craches, Samba finds this after some 5 long minutes. Until that time, although a new user logs

Marc Ewing wrote: > > I''m looking for some evidence, backup up with dates and references, > that shows that the Linux community responds to security problems > more quickly than other OS vendors, and thus might be considered > "more secure". A number of fairly high profile corporations are > starting to look for such information as they consider Linux as an

Dear List, I couldn't find any package that performs the "weight of evidence" of predictors (a transformation usually performed in credit scoring applications). Is there any that you know? Thanks, Axel. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all: I have been thinking to import below one data file (.txt)into R by read.table(..,skip=1, header=T). But How can I deal with the repeated rows of TABLE NO.1 and names of data variables in the middle of this data file. The similar block will be repeated 100 times, here only show 4 of them and within each block, data records also can vary, here only paste 4 rows for example. I appreciate

Dear all: I have been thinking to import below one data file (.txt)into R by read.table(..,skip=1, header=T). But How can I deal with the repeated rows of TABLE NO.1 and names of data variables in the middle of this data file. The similar block will be repeated 100 times, here only show 4 of them and within each block, data records also can vary, here only paste 4 rows for example. I appreciate

On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. >> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's >> foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). > Really? Then why did you forward your reply a