search for: evid

...he code? Thank you very much. Peter B. Function: eval.delta <- function(delta){ cat("VALUES\n") vlr <- NULL k <- 0 for(j in 1:length(delta)) if(delta[j] <= 2){ k <- k+1 vlr[k] <- delta[j] } cat("<= 2 (no credible evidence)\t",k,"\t",vlr,"\n") vlr <- NULL k <- 0 for(j in 1:length(delta)) if(delta[j]>2 & delta[j] <= 4){ k <- k+1 vlr[k] <- delta[j] } cat("> 2 y <= 4 (weak evidence)\t",k,"\t",vlr,&quot...

...he code? Thank you very much. Peter B. Function: eval.delta <- function(delta){ cat("VALUES\n") vlr <- NULL k <- 0 for(j in 1:length(delta)) if(delta[j] <= 2){ k <- k+1 vlr[k] <- delta[j] } cat("<= 2 (no credible evidence)\t",k,"\t",vlr,"\n") vlr <- NULL k <- 0 for(j in 1:length(delta)) if(delta[j]>2 & delta[j] <= 4){ k <- k+1 vlr[k] <- delta[j] } cat("> 2 y <= 4 (weak evidence)\t",k,"\t",vlr,&quot...

Hello, I have a program called "Evidence Scribe" it runs with .NET Whenever I try to run it I receive this: Code: blake at blake-desktop ~ $ env WINEPREFIX="/home/blake/.wine" wine "C:\Program Files\Idoneum\Evidence Scribe\Evidence Scribe.exe" fixme:gdiplus:GdipGetFontHeightGivenDPI Unhandled unit type:...

Hello, well, I searched list-archive, cran and the references, but found nothing. Thus: Does anybody around here know anything about Dempster-Shafer Theory, Evidence Theory or Hints in R? Has anybody stumbled about a package that I overlooked or implemented something in this area? I really would like to not implement a hint-model a second time. My apologies if I missed something obvious, but I would be glad if someone could give me a hint. Regards, Lars...

All, I am constructing a pharmacokinetic dataset and have hit a snag. The dataset can be demonstrated in the following way: myData <- data.frame( evid = c(1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0), time = 1:10, last.dose.time = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 5, 5, 7, 8, 9, 9) ) The evid field is an indicator variable for whether the associated observation is a dosing record (when it takes value 1) or an observation (where it takes value 0). The time field is a date-time...

...: > On 06/18/2016 02:49 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Fri, June 17, 2016 21:40, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html >> With respect citing another person's or people's opinion in support >> of >> your own is not evidence in the sense I understand the word to mean. > > I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. > This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's > foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). Really? Then wh...

...13:16, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> >>> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on >>> epistemology. >>> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the >>> world's foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, >>> Mozilla, etc). I would rather look to Bruce Schneier and Noam Chomsky for guidance before I would take security advice from organisations that have already shown to be compromised in the ma...

Hi, I'm the Evidence Scribe developer. I've actually corresponded with the original poster about this and worked things out (I'm building a version specifically for Linux). moosehadly can verify that this problem has been solved if you need him to. Could a moderator delete this thread? The topic is "C...

...arning for potential courtgoers: "reasonable doubt" NEVER has a direct statistical interpretation in a UK court. "Beyond reasonable doubt" is a state of mind in the jury or the presiding magistrates. While a statistical test may indicate the strength of some part of the relevant evidence, and thereby reduce the remaining doubt in the minds of the jury/magistrates, UK law requires that the jury (or magistrate) to judge whether doubts are reasonable or not on common-sense and not on statistical grounds. The two can be very different, because the doubt in the minds of the jury mu...

...wo of them are auto-answer.) I think this is one bug tickling another bug; bad messages from * are killing the 7960. I'd like anyone else with experiences with this type of failure with Asterisk to give me a shout; I'm going to report this to Cisco somehow, but don't have enough evidence. JT

...sible using this software. It's a fact Did you know......... For example that every click you make on Windows 98 Start Menu is logged and stored for ever on a hidden encrypted database within your own computer? your PC is keeping frightening records of both your online and off-line activity. Evidence Eliminator. http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/go.shtml?A653615 dbbtuqtlqqifyzlm

Part I. The original LangRef appeared to be “nice and pretty” and originally ‘undef’ did not seem to stick out. Then evidence came to light in the form of bug reports, and in the form of Dan Gohman’s email “the nsw story”, that all was not good for ‘undef’ [1,2]. A proposal was made based on that evidence. A presentation was made at an llvm gathering. A paper was written. The proposal has even been implemented and te...

...seeing such "weird" observation under H0 defines p-value and it might relate to the strength of association somehow. But I read the following statement from Alan Agresti's "An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis" : "Chi-squared tests simply indicate the degree of EVIDENCE for an association....It is sensible to decompose chi-squared into components, study residuals, and estimate parameters such as odds ratios that describe the STRENGTH OF ASSOCIATION". Can I do this "decomposition" in R for the following example including 2 contingency tables? &...

http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/go.shtml?A654710 You're in Serious Trouble - It's a Proven Fact! Deleting "Internet Cache and History" will NOT protect you because any of the Web Pages, Pictures, Movies, Videos, Sounds, E-mail, Chat Logs and Everything Else you see or do could easily be rec...

...raches, Samba finds this after some 5 long minutes. Until that time, although a new user logs into the same workstation, it STILL doesn't make a "POSTEXEC" operation on the previous share !!! (Still alive) Example of current behaviour - in-out log of current Samba release (IMHO bad) EVID [2003/07/31 15:04:20] hugo BEG z IP:195.113.84.205 (* PREEXEC -> Starting first connection, RESET at 15:06 approx.) EVID [2003/07/31 15:07:55] hugo BEG z IP:195.113.84.205 (* PREEXEC -> Logging again to the station) EVID [2003/07/31 15:11:29] hugo END z IP:0.0.0.0 (* POSTEXEC -> The fir...

Marc Ewing wrote: > > I''m looking for some evidence, backup up with dates and references, > that shows that the Linux community responds to security problems > more quickly than other OS vendors, and thus might be considered > "more secure". A number of fairly high profile corporations are > starting to look for such infor...

Dear List, I couldn't find any package that performs the "weight of evidence" of predictors (a transformation usually performed in credit scoring applications). Is there any that you know? Thanks, Axel. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...be repeated 100 times, here only show 4 of them and within each block, data records also can vary, here only paste 4 rows for example. I appreciate your consideration and help in this holiday season. Happy Holiday! TABLE NO. 1 ID GID TIME OBS AMT EVID RATE ADDL II CMT WT IPRE 3.1000E+01 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 4.0000E+00 2.4000E-02 3.3918E+02 3.1000E+01 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 2.0500E+02 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0...

...be repeated 100 times, here only show 4 of them and within each block, data records also can vary, here only paste 4 rows for example. I appreciate your consideration and help in this holiday season. Happy Holiday! TABLE NO. 1 ID GID TIME OBS AMT EVID RATE ADDL II CMT WT IPRE 3.1000E+01 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 4.0000E+00 2.4000E-02 3.3918E+02 3.1000E+01 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 2.0500E+02 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0...

On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. >> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's >> foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). > Really? Then why did you forward your reply a private message to a > public mailing list if not to do exactly what you claim you wish to > avoid? Accidents happen. I didn't in...