search for: euphemisms

...s sqlite so > changing the version of it is not a Good Thing for system stabilty). > Other repos in that list have been effectively unmaintained for a number > of years so they contain packages that may have severe unfixed security > vulnerabilities. I suggest that we shouldn't use euphemisms when it's far more valuable to come out and say it. I would certainly appreciate if the centos docs explicitly tagged the other repos with these comments. Factual commentary about risks does not come anywhere close to libel... regards, mark hahn.

Hello all, During discussion at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2430#discussion_r1592317940 I found that while `nut-names.txt` documents the `battery.charge.low` as the "Remaining battery level when UPS switches to LB (percent)", there is no counterpart as `battery.charge.high`. First I thought one could be just added... but for that matter, what could one logically mean -

What's amazing to me is, after "Intel Inside - don't divide" (their 486 debacle), they didn't learn and have a better plan for addressing these kinds of things. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Murphy" <lists at colorremedies.com> To: "centos" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:06:01 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS]

On 01/22/2018 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On 01/22/18 09:08, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/18/2018 09:42 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/18/18 03:41, Pete Biggs wrote: >>>> >>>>> Look at: >>>>> >>>>> https://t.co/6fT61xgtGH >>>>> >>>>> Get the

On 5/19/2015 10:54 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > And that one drives me nuts. It breaks PXE boot kickstart builds. Maybe > *you* have all same model systems from the same manufacturer; we've got > boxen from...<thinking> at least five or six manufacturers, of varying > ages, from the 10+ yr old Altix 3000 from SGI, to the current one from > SGI, to my 5 yr old Dell

Once upon a time, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> said: > "We recommend that OEMs, cloud service providers, system > manufacturers, software vendors and end users stop deployment of > current versions." Current versions of what? Microcode? Well, that's the only thing Intel provides for CPUs, so that's all it can be. > What these means for people who

I have found a strange scoping problem in Sweave. The following Rnw file doesn't produce the same output in Sweave as it does if I produce an R file using Stangle and execute that: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \begin{document} <<R>>= election <- data.frame(A=1:3, B=9:7, C=rep(0,3)) partytotal <- rep(0, ncol(election)) for (i in 1:ncol(election)) { partytotal[i] <-

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > During discussion at > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/2430#discussion_r1592317940 I > found that while `nut-names.txt` documents the `battery.charge.low` as the > "Remaining battery level when UPS switches to LB (percent)", there is no > counterpart as `battery.charge.high`.

...ging the version of it is not a Good Thing for system stabilty). >> Other repos in that list have been effectively unmaintained for a number >> of years so they contain packages that may have severe unfixed security >> vulnerabilities. > > I suggest that we shouldn't use euphemisms when it's far more valuable > to come out and say it. I would certainly appreciate if the centos docs > explicitly tagged the other repos with these comments. Factual > commentary > about risks does not come anywhere close to libel... > > regards, mark hahn. A very old Brit...

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > Here are a couple of posts for our reading pleasure: > > Intel recommends not installing the microcode now: > http://intel.ly/2DsL9qz Except this doesn't mention microcode at all. I can't even tell WTF they're recommending not doing in this doc, it's that badly written. You have

While researching another issue unrelated to Syslinux, I found some mildly disturbing news that affects Syslinux. As HPA stated back on 2009-06-04, hard drive manufacturers are pushing towards a 4096B (4kiB; 4k) native sector size. They're calling it "Advanced Format Technology". It appears that WD (Western Digital; WDC) is the first with some products being released back in

> Am 24.01.2018 um 22:22 schrieb Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>: > > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> said: >> "We recommend that OEMs, cloud service providers, system >> manufacturers, software vendors and end users stop deployment of >> current versions." Current versions of what? Microcode? > > Well,

Hi Specs in subject line: CentOS 6.X all latest patches), iptables 1.47, Apache2.2 I use the Geolite legacy databases together with iptables 1.47 to filter traffic for a variety of ports and only allow .AU traffic to have access. Maxmind (https://dev.maxmind.com/geoip/geoip2/geolite2/) changed the default DB to the latest version which is GeoLite2, this leaves all users in need of the old

On Nov 14, 2020, at 5:56 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 16:38 -0700, Warren Young wrote: >> On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: >>> I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. >> >> When was the last time you tried it? > > I'm currently using it, and the performance

I''ve just put in production a Linux firewall with 4 ethernet interfaces and 3 openvpn tun virtual interfaces. With Shorewall everything work like a charm (only a little hassle with some details, due to bad configuration, not bugs!) Great tool! Tom and other Shorewall developers, you all are great! Bye (and sorry for my bad english) -- Paolo Basenghi - Centro elaborazione dati

I''d like to be able to use a has_many :through association and treat the associations as a list but I''m getting this error when I try an use an acts_as_list method: NoMethodError: undefined method `move_to_bottom'' I''m using edge rails r6786. Here are my domain rules: Activities are things students can do. Units consists of a sequenced list of

Dear Martin, Sad that the bug is beyond your ken... Fortunately, the error happens only rarely...The length of LYGH was 719 and there were only two such errors..I will just replace them with NA and make do. By the by, what if I send LYGH as an attachment to your actual mail ( not the r-help mail)? Will it help? Can you then pinpoint the cause? Or should I raise a bug

On 5/19/2015 10:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 19 May 2015 11:40, <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: >> >> >> Or if you want a bigger hammer: >> >> systemctl disable NetworkManager.service >> systemctl enable network.service >> systemctl stop NetworkManager.service >> systemctl start network.service >> >> The above will disable

On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 16:38 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. > > When was the last time you tried it? I'm currently using it, and the performance sucks. Perhaps it's not the software itself or the CPU but the on-board controllers or other

Hi, I want to install customized centos on multiple systems. Can PXE boot do that ? Apart from this is there any other way of doing image copy of centos OS and installing it on several client machines through network. I used clonezilla, but after image cloning, i will again have to use the clonezilla LIVE CD on client machine to do a image restore. I want to make a clone of centos OS and