search for: euphemism

...s sqlite so > changing the version of it is not a Good Thing for system stabilty). > Other repos in that list have been effectively unmaintained for a number > of years so they contain packages that may have severe unfixed security > vulnerabilities. I suggest that we shouldn't use euphemisms when it's far more valuable to come out and say it. I would certainly appreciate if the centos docs explicitly tagged the other repos with these comments. Factual commentary about risks does not come anywhere close to libel... regards, mark hahn.

...Remaining battery level when UPS switches to LB (percent)", there is no counterpart as `battery.charge.high`. First I thought one could be just added... but for that matter, what could one logically mean - an overcharge (as in, "possibly harmful to the chemistry of the cells")? Or an euphemism(*) for being "well charged" (maybe not 100% if the device hovers at some 85%-95% to extend battery life)? (*) Recent work in usbhid-ups dealt with optional "OL+DISCHRG" warning throttling for known-hovering devices using a custom option; if the "euphemism" above is...

...e 20180108 microcode, which was previously set to latest at this link, and it is now reverted to the 20171117 microcode. https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/27337/Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-File?v=t What these means for people who have CPUs which were not crashing (rebooting being a new euphemism for crashing) , but saw variant 2 Spectre mitigation with the 20180108 microcode, will lose full mitigation until Intel gets its ducks into a row. *eye roll* > Linus Torvalds agrees: > http://tcrn.ch/2n2mEcA His comments aren't about microcode though. And it also looks like he got I...

On 01/22/2018 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On 01/22/18 09:08, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/18/2018 09:42 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/18/18 03:41, Pete Biggs wrote: >>>> >>>>> Look at: >>>>> >>>>> https://t.co/6fT61xgtGH >>>>> >>>>> Get the

...modify connection.autoconnect yes ipv4.method manual ipv4.addr "10.0.0.1/24" ipv4.dns "10.0.1.1, 10.0.1.2" ipv4.gateway 10.0.0.254 Does not reference an actual interface name and nmcli is figuring everything out for you. *Unless* he is using "connection" here as a euphemism for an interface. If "connection" is the actual string then a script would work regardless of host.

...ware vendors and end users stop deployment of > current versions." Current versions of what? Microcode? Well, that's the only thing Intel provides for CPUs, so that's all it can be. > What these means for people who have CPUs which were not crashing > (rebooting being a new euphemism for crashing) , but saw variant 2 > Spectre mitigation with the 20180108 microcode, will lose full > mitigation until Intel gets its ducks into a row. Lots of people weren't seeing issues, but that's in part because Intel's updated microcode release only actually updated microcod...

I have found a strange scoping problem in Sweave. The following Rnw file doesn't produce the same output in Sweave as it does if I produce an R file using Stangle and execute that: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \begin{document} <<R>>= election <- data.frame(A=1:3, B=9:7, C=rep(0,3)) partytotal <- rep(0, ncol(election)) for (i in 1:ncol(election)) { partytotal[i] <-

...vel when UPS switches to LB (percent)", there is no > counterpart as `battery.charge.high`. First I thought one could be just > added... but for that matter, what could one logically mean - an overcharge > (as in, "possibly harmful to the chemistry of the cells")? Or an > euphemism(*) for being "well charged" (maybe not 100% if the device hovers > at some 85%-95% to extend battery life)? I don't think we should use .high, unless a significant number of units/protoocls issue a "battery charge is high" state with a consistent meaning. So no. If thi...

...ging the version of it is not a Good Thing for system stabilty). >> Other repos in that list have been effectively unmaintained for a number >> of years so they contain packages that may have severe unfixed security >> vulnerabilities. > > I suggest that we shouldn't use euphemisms when it's far more valuable > to come out and say it. I would certainly appreciate if the centos docs > explicitly tagged the other repos with these comments. Factual > commentary > about risks does not come anywhere close to libel... > > regards, mark hahn. A very old Bri...

...e 20180108 microcode, which was previously set to latest at this link, and it is now reverted to the 20171117 microcode. https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/27337/Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-File?v=t What these means for people who have CPUs which were not crashing (rebooting being a new euphemism for crashing) , but saw variant 2 Spectre mitigation with the 20180108 microcode, will lose full mitigation until Intel gets its ducks into a row. *eye roll* > Linus Torvalds agrees: > http://tcrn.ch/2n2mEcA His comments aren't about microcode though. And it also looks like he got I...

While researching another issue unrelated to Syslinux, I found some mildly disturbing news that affects Syslinux. As HPA stated back on 2009-06-04, hard drive manufacturers are pushing towards a 4096B (4kiB; 4k) native sector size. They're calling it "Advanced Format Technology". It appears that WD (Western Digital; WDC) is the first with some products being released back in

...deployment of >> current versions." Current versions of what? Microcode? > > Well, that's the only thing Intel provides for CPUs, so that's all it > can be. > >> What these means for people who have CPUs which were not crashing >> (rebooting being a new euphemism for crashing) , but saw variant 2 >> Spectre mitigation with the 20180108 microcode, will lose full >> mitigation until Intel gets its ducks into a row. > > Lots of people weren't seeing issues, but that's in part because Intel's > updated microcode release only ac...

...ve other ideas how to tackle this? (this made me really sleep well!) thanks Jobst -- "XP: If you are nine years old you are just going to love it. If you're a few years older you'll resent the choking paternalistic atmosphere of vapid gee-whiz kiddie entertainment (babysitting), euphemism and fake-friendly bullying." | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, | | |0| Barrett & Sales Essentials |0|0|0| Caulfield South, 3162, Australia

...8 SATA/SAS ports: https://www.newegg.com/p/0ZK-08UH-0GWZ1 > > That says it's for HP. So will you still get firmware updates once > the warranty is expired? Does it exclusively work with HP hardware? > > And are these good? You asked for ?cost-efficient,? which I took to be a euphemism for ?cheapest thing that could possibly work.? If you?re willing to spend money, then I fully expect you can find JBOD cards you?ll be happy with. Personally, I get servers with enough SFF-8087 SAS connectors on them to address all the disks in the system. I haven?t bothered with add-on SATA car...

I''ve just put in production a Linux firewall with 4 ethernet interfaces and 3 openvpn tun virtual interfaces. With Shorewall everything work like a charm (only a little hassle with some details, due to bad configuration, not bugs!) Great tool! Tom and other Shorewall developers, you all are great! Bye (and sorry for my bad english) -- Paolo Basenghi - Centro elaborazione dati

I''d like to be able to use a has_many :through association and treat the associations as a list but I''m getting this error when I try an use an acts_as_list method: NoMethodError: undefined method `move_to_bottom'' I''m using edge rails r6786. Here are my domain rules: Activities are things students can do. Units consists of a sequenced list of

...quot;length.w" "residuals" "fitted" "call" "x" > [21] "series" > Many thanks in advance.... > Thanking you, > Yours sincerely, > AKSHAY M KULKARNI Hmm... indeed, "conundrum" may be a euphemism for the situation..... which clearly points to a bug *somewhere*. As your dput() shows, the argument *is* a simple vector .. and even if the default dput() may loose a few bits in precison... you did show that with (possibly only almost) identical argument, the error did not happen. I really have...

On 5/19/2015 10:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 19 May 2015 11:40, <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: >> >> >> Or if you want a bigger hammer: >> >> systemctl disable NetworkManager.service >> systemctl enable network.service >> systemctl stop NetworkManager.service >> systemctl start network.service >> >> The above will disable

On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 16:38 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. > > When was the last time you tried it? I'm currently using it, and the performance sucks. Perhaps it's not the software itself or the CPU but the on-board controllers or other

Hi, I want to install customized centos on multiple systems. Can PXE boot do that ? Apart from this is there any other way of doing image copy of centos OS and installing it on several client machines through network. I used clonezilla, but after image cloning, i will again have to use the clonezilla LIVE CD on client machine to do a image restore. I want to make a clone of centos OS and