search for: etrust

At work I'm used to tools like eTrust Access Control (aka SEOS). eTrust takes away the ability to manage the eTrust config from root and puts it in the hands of "security admin". So there's a good separation of duties; security admin control the security ruleset, but are limited by the OS permissions (so even if they gr...

...OSE[5610]: Answering with capability 0x400 (ilbc) Jan 10 16:06:01 VERBOSE[5610]: 12 headers, 10 lines Jan 10 16:06:01 VERBOSE[5610]: Reliably Transmitting: INVITE sip:11@192.168.9.110 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.9.101:5060;branch=z9hG4bK27e3c9d3 From: "Robi - Hramse" <sip:11@posta.etrust.si>;tag=as170e15a1 To: <sip:11@192.168.9.110> Contact: <sip:11@192.168.9.101> Call-ID: 1f8e55835b6e92d43daa9e1f399de8fb@posta.etrust.si CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:06:01 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER Content-Type: applicat...

On 01/23/2015 06:01 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > At work I'm used to tools like eTrust Access Control (aka SEOS). eTrust > takes away the ability to manage the eTrust config from root and puts it > in the hands of "security admin". So there's a good separation of duties; > security admin control the security ruleset, but are limited by the OS > permissions...

Content Inspecion SMTPMAIL could not deliver the e-mail below because of unreachable host Please check the recipients e-mail address before you try again. Received: from Unknown (61.113.174.142) by ETRUST-SMTP (10.3.0.22) From: r-bugs@r-project.org To: aikins@pixie.udw.ac.za Subject: Mail Delivery System (aikins@pixie.udw.ac.za) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:56:02 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" X-Priority: 1 X-MS...

I tried downloading R-2.7.2 (http://cran.cnr.berkeley.edu/bin/windows/base/R-2.7.2-win32.exe, both from Berkeley and cran) and both times I got a warning from Computer Associates eTrust Antivirus (version 7.1.710) that the Win32/Adclicker.JO trojan was detected: The Win32/Adclicker.JO was detected in C:\USERS\USER\APPDATA\LOCAL\MICROSOFT\WINDOWS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\LOW\CONTENT.IE5\61HAYRTG\R-2.7.2-WIN32[1].EXE. Has anyone else seen this? Thanks, Dave [[alternative HTML v...

Hey Guys, I have a network of windows clients with a couple of linux servers for various tasks. What I would like to do is have some form of antivirus on the clients that will log alerts to something on a linux server and store the info in sql. Anybody have any idea on something that can do this? I tried asking on the securityfocus virus list and I emailed grisoft about their network product.

...mbr to load windows, so I could get some help on recovering the hopefulle not lost data. Does anyone have a suggestion for how to save those important files? Lincoln (who hopes to be able to get some sleep tonight!) ________________________________________ Denne mail er scannet for virus med eTrust EZ Armor - Markedets bedste sikkerhedsprodukt! Hent din egen version gratis! Klik http://www.provideit.dk/sol/ Få din egen webmail på http://www.sol.dk - gratis og med dig overalt!

Hi, As we are moving away from an NT based enviroment to SAMBA we are looking for a managed virus scanner for our desktops. Managed means: 1. Remote deployment 2. Updates from a local repository 3. Notification and reporting. The existing solutions (Symantec, TrendMicro, Mcafee) assume that you have an NT server. I would much rather have a Linux/Samba based managment console. Any ideas/leads?

...allerID(${CALLERIDNUM}) exten => s,5,Goto(from-pstn,s,1) and when executed : -- Accepting unauthenticated call from 193.77.90.224, requested format = 2, actual format = 2 -- Executing NoOp("IAX2/guest@252/2", "IAX call from outside "Robert Rozman" <252@posta.etrust.si>: Name: Robert Rozman| Number: 252@postaetrustsi") in new stack -- Executing Wait("IAX2/guest@252/2", "2") in new stack -- Executing SetCIDNum("IAX2/guest@252/2", "1252@postaetrustsi") in new stack -- Executing NoOp("IAX2/guest@252...

...first try succeeded, but the second try was again the same result. And we found out that this problem is bound to the computer not the user, as the user can logon on another computer normal without any problems. All computers were running Windows XP Prof SP1a. Altough there is a virus Scanner (CA Etrust Inoculan) with up-to-date signatures on the computer, we scanned the computers in question by 2 additional Anti Virus Packages, 1. H+BEDV AntiVir and 2. Kasperksy, all scanners marking the computer clean. Running "nbtstat -RR" didn't also not solve the problem. Next, our MCSE decid...

...11:06:37 DEBUG[6133]: chan_sip.c:1313 create_addr: Setting NAT on VRTP to 0 Jan 27 11:06:37 DEBUG[6133]: acl.c:176 ast_apply_ha: ##### Testing 192.168.0.160 with 192.168.0.0 Jan 27 11:06:37 DEBUG[6133]: chan_sip.c:840 __sip_ack: Stopping retransmission on '5fbd3f4610f8a9360278eb7379f41bde@posta.etrust.si' of Request 102: Found Jan 27 11:06:42 DEBUG[6133]: chan_iax2.c:5528 socket_read: Immediately destroying 1, having received hangup Jan 27 11:06:42 WARNING[6133]: app_meetme.c:962 conf_run: Unable to write frame to channel: No such file or directory Thanks in advance, Rob.

Hi, I've been kicking this idea around, and the problem with it escapes me. I'm looking for someone to tell me why this is a bad idea. The new OpenSSH includes the AuthorizedKeysCommand, which was mostly added to let people use a command to look up user keys in LDAP. LDAP key lookup have some limitations -- specifically, the common openssh-lpk_openldap schema won't let you add

Hi Everyone, I''m working at getting Rails introduced in my company. We''re a J2EE shop. Our deployments make use of thee-tiered architecture, just to be clear, that means that there are essentially three machines involved in dealing out an app: a webserver, an application server, and a database server. As I see it (unless I''ve missed something) Ruby is essentially

...p at r-project.org" <r-help at r-project.org> Message-ID: <3A40832EDA5ED541862093713985F7B56B6490232E at NA-EXMSG-C105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" For what it's worth, Computer Associates updated their signatures; and eTrust no longer reports the installation program for the Windows version of R-2.7.2 as infected. I found it surprisingly difficult to learn about how the Win32/Adclicker.JO virus operates, and how eTrust detects it. I couldn't even get anyone to admit it was a false positive (though it seems clear...