search for: trust

On 07/20/2017 02:20 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: > > 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run > the command? Does it complain anything about these files? > > >

...he getfattr outputs of the 12 files from > all 3 nodes using `getfattr -d -m . -e hex */gluster/engine/brick/* > path-to-file` ? > > *NODE01:* *getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names* *# file: gluster/engine/brick/.shard/8aa74564-6740-403e-ad51-f56d9ca5d7a7.68* *trusted.afr.dirty=0x000000000000000000000000* *trusted.afr.engine-client-1=0x000000000000000000000000* *trusted.afr.engine-client-2=0x000000120000000000000000* *trusted.bit-rot.version=0x090000000000000059647d5b000447e9* *trusted.gfid=0xe3565b5014954e5bae883bceca47b7d9* *getfattr: Removing leading '...

Hi, Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run the > command? Does it complain anything about these files? > No, glustershd.log is clean, no extra log after command on all 3 nodes > 2. Are these 12 files also present in the 3rd data brick?

...3 nodes using `getfattr -d -m . -e hex > //gluster/engine/brick//path-to-file` ? > > > */NODE01:/* > /getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names/ > /# file: > gluster/engine/brick/.shard/8aa74564-6740-403e-ad51-f56d9ca5d7a7.68/ > /trusted.afr.dirty=0x000000000000000000000000/ > /trusted.afr.engine-client-1=0x000000000000000000000000/ > /trusted.afr.engine-client-2=0x000000120000000000000000/ > /trusted.bit-rot.version=0x090000000000000059647d5b000447e9/ > /trusted.gfid=0xe3565b5014954e5bae883bceca47b7d9...

...<= NO OK /test 100MB 4.0MB <= OK / 7GB 5.2GB <= NO OK Is seems this is 4 time the original size for / and /soft Getfattr for the four nodes : ylal3020:/etc/ucarp/interface # getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.quota.size -e hex /soft/venus ; getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.quota.size -e hex /soft/venus/test ; getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.quota.size -e hex /soft/venus/psa;getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.quota.size -e hex /soft/venus/soft getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path n...

Hello, I am using SAMBA 4.1.6 AD on Ubuntu 14.04.02, I am trying to use the Active Directory Domains and Trust tool but it keeps giving me this message. I am trying to fix this issue: The requested operation cannot be completed. The computer must be trusted for delegation and the current user account must be configured to allow delegation. (SQLEditors) Would you please help how I can solve this issue?...

Currently I have the following empirical knowledge about outgoing trust: - In case of creating this type of trust using direction=both we get outgoing trust working partially - it is possible to login to Windows member of trusting domain with trusted credentials as well as access shares on trusted side further. It is impossible to make the same login on Linux members....

...drive. > > file-3 sha256 and bitrot signature matches and healthy. > > > file-1 output from > > "sha256sum" = "71eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d561 > 768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4" > > > "getfattr -m. -e hex -d " > # file: file-1 > trusted.bit-rot.bad-file=0x3100 > trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x01020000000000000071eada9352 > b1352aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4 > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b40006793d > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 > trusted.ec.dirty=0x000000000000000000000...

...still readable without any issue and no errors found in the drive. file-3 sha256 and bitrot signature matches and healthy. file-1 output from "sha256sum" = "71eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4" "getfattr -m. -e hex -d " # file: file-1 trusted.bit-rot.bad-file=0x3100 trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x01020000000000000071eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4 trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b40006793d trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000 trusted.ec.siz...

Hi, I have a file in my brick which was signed by bitrot and latter when running scrub it was marked as bad. Now, I want to verify file again manually. just to clarify my doubt how can I do this? regards Amudhan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170921/f69ff7be/attachment.html>

Hi, Having read the release notes on the status of trusts within samba, we see for 4.9 > "improved support for trusted domains" but we also always see these messages: > "Both sides of the trust need to fully trust each other!" and > "DCs of domain A can grant domain admin rights in domain B" What we would li...

Hi all, I was hoping to setup a realm trust between a Samba AD domain and a kerberos realm running mit-krb5, however it looks like that isn't currently supported. Is that correct, or am I missing something (I'm running Samba 4.9.4)? Having noticed that "samba-tool domain trust" only seems to cater for trusts involving...

...already faced this >> situation and if so how he solved it. >> > >> > Thank you. >> >> -- >> >> >> Vinicius Silva >> SOC >> >> >> BRA: + 55 51 2117.1000 | 55 11 5521.2021 >> USA: + 1 888 259.5801 >> vbs at e-trust.com.br <mailto:vbs at e-trust.com.br> >> skype: vinicius.bones.silva >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Smiley face >> >> www.e-trust.com.br <http://www.e-trust.com.br/> >> >> >> Esta mensagem...

...t;>> >>> file-1 output from >>> >>> "sha256sum" = "71eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d56 >>> 1768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4" >>> >>> >>> "getfattr -m. -e hex -d " >>> # file: file-1 >>> trusted.bit-rot.bad-file=0x3100 >>> trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x01020000000000000071eada9352b135 >>> 2aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4 >>> trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b40006793d >>> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 >>>...

hi all, thanks to Rowland advice, I checked the net trustdom way to establish trust between domains. In my setup I have a samba-4.7.4 NT4 domain named TRUSTING which needs to have a trusting (outgoing)[1] with samba-4.7.4 AD domain named ATENEOAD. As far as I know it is very similar to: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/Interdo...

Setup: Samba3beta3 domain (NEWDOM) with a single PDC. No winbind activated. Uses smbpasswd for user authentication. Windows 2K AD (OLDDOM) domain with two DCs. I've been struggling to get a trust established one way with these two domains. Since I have a native W2K AD domain, I have to use AD domain tools to establish the trusts. I followed the documentation regarding creating a domain trust account on the Samba side. Using the W2K tools, I have successfully managed to get the OLDDOM domain...

...rpm -qa|grep cert > ca-certificates-2018.2.22-70.0.el7_5.noarch > [root at stan2 ~]# Can you verify the ca-certificates package on both your systems and compare? Here is what my C7 box shows (same version package as yours): [root at hp3 ~]# rpm -Vv ca-certificates ......... /etc/pki/ca-trust ......... /etc/pki/ca-trust/README ......... c /etc/pki/ca-trust/ca-legacy.conf ......... /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted ......... /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/README ......... /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/java ......... /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/java/README .M....... g /etc/pki/ca-tr...

...few of your questions. Am 26.02.19 um 20:59 schrieb lists via samba: > Hi, > > No replies unfortunately. Unsure why. There are still a lot of questions open and I think a lot of things have to be done. > > We searched the list, and we found little discussion on the subject of > trusts. We see occasional questions, but they are often left unanswered, > like this one. > > If someone could point us to some good up-to-date docs on trusts with > samba then we would really appreciate it. > > We setup a test environment (one samba 4.9.4 testad2 AD, one native >...

Hello, I am currently testing for Samba4. The creation of the domain and the secondary Dc implementation works well. But by performing tests for a fail over situation I realized that when the DC that created the domain is in fail over the linux client machine can no longer retrieve the list of users from the domain. I would like to know if a person has already faced this situation and if so how he

...UNKNOWN) Gid: (20936/ UNKNOWN) Access: 2018-04-25 09:41:24.276780766 +0200 Modify: 2018-05-15 08:54:20.392048056 +0200 Change: 2018-05-15 08:54:20.392048056 +0200 Birth: - # file: data/myvolume-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/filename.shareKey trusted.gfid=0x3b6c722cd6c64a4180fa028809671d63 trusted.gfid2path.9cb852a48fe5e361=0x38666131356462642d636435632d343930302d623838392d3066653766636534366131332f6e6361646d696e6973747261746f722e73686172654b6579 trusted.glusterfs.quota.8fa15dbd-cd5c-4900-b889-0fe7fce46a13.contri.1=0x0000000000000000000000000...