search for: eth7

Hi, I have 8 ethernet cards installed. Is it possible to use eth0-eth6 as the net interface for shorewall and eth1 as the lan network? Thanks. sangprabv sangprabv@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...ess}=="90:e2:ba:46:ef:30", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth6" SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="90:e2:ba:46:ef:31", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth7" After reboot it worked fine for all 3 servers, but some time later after another reboot I get: # systemctl status network network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2015-10-20 20:37:30 CEST; 13...

Hi, I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 , I don't see anything which i am assume is normal. eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:44:DB:CC BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0

Anyone know how to get statistics on bonded interfaces? I have a system that does not use eth0-3, rather we have bond0, bond1, bond2. The members of each bond are not eth0-3, rather they are eth6, eth7, etc. I didn't see anything in the man page about forcing sar to collect data on specific network interfaces.

...work bigger network when using this command: sudo virsh net-define biggernetwork.xml on the following XML document: <network> <name>bigger network</name> <forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'> <pf dev='eth5'/> <pf dev='eth7'/> </forward> </network> It seems that you are not able to add multiple physical functions to this network to create a pool of more virtual functions. Is there anyway that you can do this using that I am missing? I seem to be looking at the documentation and there seems to b...

...:46:ef:30", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", > NAME="eth6" > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", > ATTR{address}=="90:e2:ba:46:ef:31", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", > NAME="eth7" > > After reboot it worked fine for all 3 servers, but some time later after > another reboot I get: > > # systemctl status network > network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) > Active: failed (Result: exit-code) si...

...raffic, regardless of the connection mode you >> choose, each must have a unique IP address even if they can't see each >> other. >> >> >> >> >> But each time I, for example, define the guest, it start with a ascending >> number of interface: eth6,eth7, eth8, etc, Now is initializing with eth12. >> >> >> There must be a mixup in the explanation - I'm understanding that you put >> the same config file in each guest, but each guest, when it starts, shows a >> different ethernet interface in its ifconfig. That doesn...

...Router 2 | | --------- Switch -------- | | Firewall WAN LAN Empty Empty Empty Empty Empty Empty | | | | | | | | eth0 eth1 eth2 eth3 eth4 eth5 eth6 eth7 ----------------- ------------------- PCI-X PCI Both routers use HSRP from Cisco to share information about who is alive. This app uses multicast UDP packets to 224.0.0.1 address, port 1985. The problem is, after a while (1 or 2 minutes) the CPU reaches...

...time out, TxStatus 00 TxFrameId resetting... I has a OpenSuse 10.2 with xen 3.0.3 (default). Two quad-port cards more 1 onboard ethernet. I''m running 4 firewalls. each firewall receive 2 virtual interfaces each physical interface is in a bridge: eth0 --> br0 eth1 --> br1 ..at iface eth7. I have another machine running 4 firewalls too, but is with no problems. I thank you your help! -- Djames Suhanko LinuxUser 158.760 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

...61.78 172.23.144.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 10.0.20.0 10.0.20.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 vlan20 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth4 192.168.102.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth7 10.0.100.0 10.0.100.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 vlan100 192.168.103.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth6 10.0.0.0 10.0.0.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 vlan50 10.0.30.0 10.0.30.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0...

...neric 0000:02:00.3 'I350 Gigabit Network Connection 1521' if=eth1 drv=igb unused=igb_uio,vfio-pci,uio_* *pci_generic 0000:04:00.0 'QCA986x/988x 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter 003c' if= drv=ath10k_pci unused=igb_uio,vfio-pci,uio_* *pci_generic 0000:05:00.0 'Device 15c4' if=eth7 drv=ixgbe unused=igb_uio,vfio-pci,uio_* *pci_generic 0000:05:00.1 'Device 15c4' if=eth6 drv=ixgbe unused=igb_uio,vfio-pci,uio_* *pci_generic 0000:07:00.0 'Device 15e5' if=eth5 drv=ixgbe unused=igb_uio,vfio-pci,uio_* *pci_generic 0000:07:00.1 'Device 15e5' if=eth4 drv=ixgbe u...

...ab:3e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 4: eth8: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:0e:0c:c5:14:94 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 5: eth6: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:0e:0c:c5:14:95 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 6: eth7: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:0e:0c:c5:14:96 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 7: eth9: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:0e:0c:c5:14:97 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > 8: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 15...

Hi all, I have a similar question like many asked before I know but Please help as i cant figure out where the problem is and how should I tackle. I have 2 ISP connections. I want to share the bandwidth from both. I have copied the script from many places and created my own after changes. Problem is that only one connection is utilized at a time. Not both working. ratio of consuming

Hi Ivo, --On Freitag, 23. Juni 2000 01:15 +0200 Ivo Timmermans <zarq@icicle.yi.org> wrote: > I'm not sure I fully understand your patch. This is not so important since I'm trying to get 1.0pre2 running. Although I had no luck so far, I'll point out what's going wrong at the end of this mail. > For instance, you force a > key exchange when the connection is made,

...er but I canot go beyond: *** SERVER *** Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]: tincd 1.0pre3 (Jun 27 2000 08:53:56) startin g, debug level 4 Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]: Generating 128 bits keys Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]: Ready: listening on port 655 Jun 27 09:04:59 lemon kernel: eth7: MII link partner 41e1, negotiated 01e1. Jun 27 09:05:04 lemon tinc.9[10186]: Connection from 192.168.2.100 port 1076 Jun 27 09:05:04 lemon tinc.9[10186]: Sending BASIC_INFO to 192.168.2.100 Jun 27 09:05:04 lemon tinc.9[10186]: Got request from 0.0.0.0 (192.168.2.100): 61 7 c0a80963/ffffff00:28f 2...

...AST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:30 Memory:da000000-da012800 eth7 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:18:56:73:DE UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b...

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster