Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "estimands".
Did you mean:
estimando
2012 Jul 15
1
how to extract p-value in GenMatch function
Dear R-Users,
I have a problem on extracting T-Stat and P-Value. I have written R-code below
library("Matching")
data("lalonde")
attach(lalonde)
names(lalonde)
Y <- lalonde$re78
Tr <- lalonde$treat
glm1 <- glm(Tr~age+educ+black+hisp+married+nodegr+re74+re75,family=binomial,data=lalonde)
pscore.predicted <- predict(glm1)
rr1 <-
2019 Jun 01
4
survival changes
In the next version of the survival package I intend to make a non-upwardly compatable
change to the survfit object.? With over 600 dependent packages this is not something to
take lightly, and I am currently undecided about the best way to go about it.? I'm looking
for advice.
The change: 20+ years ago I had decided not to include the initial x=0,y=1 data point in
the survfit object
2019 Jun 01
3
survival changes
> On Jun 1, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Peter Langfelder <peter.langfelder at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:22 AM Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel
> <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote:
>>
>> In the next version of the survival package I intend to make a non-upwardly compatable
>> change to the survfit object. With over 600 dependent packages
2004 Oct 22
0
New Package for Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching
...of univariate and multivariate tests to determine if balance
has been obtained by the matching procedure. These tests can also be
used to determine if an experiment or quasi-experiment is balanced on
baseline covariates. The functions provide valid standard errors and
allow one to estimate various estimands.
For documentation and further details see:
http://jsekhon.fas.harvard.edu/matching
Cheers,
Jas.
======================================
Jasjeet S. Sekhon
Associate Professor
Harvard University
Center for Basic Research in the
Social Sciences
jasjeet_sekhon at harvard.edu
http://jsekhon.fas.h...
2003 Dec 02
1
smoothing functions
Dear all,
I am trying to program an estimator which maximizes a likelihood type
objective function which is basically just lots of sums of indicator
functions of data and parameters. In order to make the optimization I
would like to smooth these functions. Since they are either 0 or 1, one
possibility is to use the normal cdf.
I am wondering whether anyone is aware of a less arbitrary choice
2004 Oct 22
0
New Package for Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching
...of univariate and multivariate tests to determine if balance
has been obtained by the matching procedure. These tests can also be
used to determine if an experiment or quasi-experiment is balanced on
baseline covariates. The functions provide valid standard errors and
allow one to estimate various estimands.
For documentation and further details see:
http://jsekhon.fas.harvard.edu/matching
Cheers,
Jas.
======================================
Jasjeet S. Sekhon
Associate Professor
Harvard University
Center for Basic Research in the
Social Sciences
jasjeet_sekhon at harvard.edu
http://jsekhon.fas.h...
2012 Jun 05
0
propensity score matching estimates?
I'm using the "Match" package to do propensity score matching. Here's some
example code that shows the problem that I'm having (much of this code is
taken from the Match package documentation):
*data(lalonde)
glm1 <- glm(treat~age + I(age^2) + educ + I(educ^2) + black +
hisp + married + nodegr + re74 + I(re74^2) + re75 + I(re75^2)
+
u74 + u75,
2019 Jun 01
0
survival changes
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:22 AM Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel
<r-devel at r-project.org> wrote:
>
> In the next version of the survival package I intend to make a non-upwardly compatable
> change to the survfit object. With over 600 dependent packages this is not something to
> take lightly, and I am currently undecided about the best way to go about it. I'm looking
2019 Jun 02
0
[EXTERNAL] Re: survival changes
On 6/1/19 1:32 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
>> On Jun 1, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Peter Langfelder <peter.langfelder at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:22 AM Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel
>> <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote:
>>> In the next version of the survival package I intend to make a non-upwardly compatable
>>> change
2013 Jul 11
0
[R-pkgs] Major Update to rms package
...etailed case
study is in http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/CourseBios330 Chapter 15.
Ordinal regression is now a direct competitor to linear models, and far
more robust, even allowing spikes in the distribution of Y.
* More generality and ease of obtaining bootstrap confidence limits
for all estimands (predictions, contrasts). The basic bootstrap is now
implemented and tends to work better than the percentile bootstrap in
terms of confidence coverage.
* Change of Surv to Srv
* Added tk/tcl progress bars for bootstrap and other repeated
calculations. This can be turned off by specify...