search for: erking

Hi, I use dovecot with IMAP over SSL and with Plain Text authentication. I've been using that for quite a while, but now (with my new PC), it's not working like it should (I tried several 1.0* releases, including 1.0-rc6. The problem is that I can't move messages from one IMAP folder to another, no matter which mail client. When I use KMail, I get: "The connection to the

Le 17/03/2015 14:45, Rowland Penny a ?crit : > On 17/03/15 13:29, S?bastien Le Ray wrote: >> >> >> Le 17/03/2015 14:25, Rowland Penny a ?crit : >>> Ah, but from my testing, winbindd on 4.2 works very similar to >>> winbind, it still ignores most of the RFC2307 attributes and as I >>> understand it, trusts still do not work. >> Mmmm

On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 14:25 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Erk, our tests are insufficient. Testbuilding an allmodconfig with this > now: Good idea. > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h [] > @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ struct kparam_array > /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ > static int __param_perm_check_##name

On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 14:25 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Erk, our tests are insufficient. Testbuilding an allmodconfig with this > now: Good idea. > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h [] > @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ struct kparam_array > /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ > static int __param_perm_check_##name

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:38:40AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > +static int queue_depth = 64; > > +module_param(queue_depth, int, 444); > > 444? Really Ted? Oops, *blush*. Thanks for catching that. - Ted

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:38:40AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > +static int queue_depth = 64; > > +module_param(queue_depth, int, 444); > > 444? Really Ted? Oops, *blush*. Thanks for catching that. - Ted

Greetings routing folks, I want to use the netmask 255.255.255.255 to insulate (not quite isolate) machines on a shared subnet from each other. This works just fine on win XP, but Linux iproute will not acccept the gateway address in one step -- neither on the command line nor via DHCP: Here''s the interface, set up with a netmask of /32: # ip addr ... 2: eth0:

Hi, This series integrate the processor.h header. There are a lot of things that are deeply architectural differences between architectures, but I've done my best to come to a settlement. With this series, I am very close to have selectable paravirt for x86_64, It applies ontop of today's x86 git, mm branch.

Hi, This series integrate the processor.h header. There are a lot of things that are deeply architectural differences between architectures, but I've done my best to come to a settlement. With this series, I am very close to have selectable paravirt for x86_64, It applies ontop of today's x86 git, mm branch.

Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> writes: > On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 22:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 14:25 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> > Erk, our tests are insufficient. Testbuilding an allmodconfig with this >> > now: >> >> Good idea. >> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h

Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> writes: > On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 22:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 14:25 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> > Erk, our tests are insufficient. Testbuilding an allmodconfig with this >> > now: >> >> Good idea. >> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h

Le 17/03/2015 14:25, Rowland Penny a ?crit : > Ah, but from my testing, winbindd on 4.2 works very similar to > winbind, it still ignores most of the RFC2307 attributes and as I > understand it, trusts still do not work. Mmmm interesting. I've been looking for a while to 4.2 precisely for this reason (rfc2307 to get consistent UID on DC) and the commit I found was only a special

I saw that the tx timer was removed in your patch queue but you weren't notifying when full. I decided to do it here instead of in the error case on add_buf for really no great reason other than I thought it made more sense for it to happen in the notify(). Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c

On Wednesday 03 August 2005 17:33, Jens von B?low wrote: > Gavin, > > >> Any ideas/advice would be warmly received right now! > > You are not going to like my response... Erk :) > The only way I could get this to work (luckily I had 2 identical sites and > was busy with the upgrade to the gen2 card) was to downgrade to zaptel > 1.0.7. Alas no - just moved down to

See attachment for full logs. Appears at first glance to be related to the lack of support for virtio-net in the guest kernel. /usr/bin/qemu-kvm /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -drive file=test1.img,cache=off,if=ide -drive file=test2.img,cache=off,if=ide -drive file=test3.img,cache=off,if=ide -drive file=../images/test.sqsh,snapshot=on,if=ide -m 500 -no-reboot -kernel /tmp/libguestfscfrLMf/kernel -initrd

Bugs item #6234, was opened at 2006-10-19 12:39 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=218&aid=6234&group_id=35 Category: Incorrect behavior Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alex Fenton (brokentoy) Assigned to: Roy Sutton (roys) Summary: ScrolledWindow very messed up on Windows Initial Comment: The

Julien Boppert <boppert@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > we have an Enterprise 450 with Solaris 2.6 and mounted NFS-shares from > an Sparc 20 (Solaris 2.6 too). On the Enterprise we run Samba 2.0.5a as > PDC and export the mounted Shares with Samba to our WIN NT 4.0 > Servicepack 3 Clients. Erk! It's generally a bad idea to import data via NFS and re-export it via Samba:

I saw that the tx timer was removed in your patch queue but you weren't notifying when full. I decided to do it here instead of in the error case on add_buf for really no great reason other than I thought it made more sense for it to happen in the notify(). Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c

Theodore Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu> writes: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:38:40AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> > +static int queue_depth = 64; >> > +module_param(queue_depth, int, 444); >> >> 444? Really Ted? > > Oops, *blush*. Thanks for catching that. Erk, our tests are insufficient. Testbuilding an allmodconfig with this now: diff --git

On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 22:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 14:25 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > Erk, our tests are insufficient. Testbuilding an allmodconfig with this > > now: > > Good idea. > > > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h > [] > > @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ struct kparam_array > > /*