search for: ereditated

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ereditated".

Did you mean: eradicated
2005 Aug 26
3
[LLVMdev] Mapping of class derivated and interfaces
> In any case when you > want to obtain a base pointer to a "derived" object (where derivation > is implemented as you showed - with nesting) it's simply a matter of > using getelementptr to obtain a pointer to the nested base object and > using that. Umm ok, but i've the strange feeling that i'm missing something.. First a simple question: getelementptr with
2004 Sep 23
1
openldap PDC : can't add machine account ; "too many domain info entries"
I've ereditated this quite messy openldap server from the previous administrator, samba (3) relies on it for acting as a PDC. The main problem (while I build a new directory from scratch) is you can't add a machine account to the domain : On the client it says the credentials are invalid, anyway the real pr...
2005 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Mapping of class derivated and interfaces
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 09:24 +0200, Nicola Lugato wrote: > > In any case when you > > want to obtain a base pointer to a "derived" object (where derivation > > is implemented as you showed - with nesting) it's simply a matter of > > using getelementptr to obtain a pointer to the nested base object and > > using that. > > Umm ok, but i've the
2005 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Mapping of class derivated and interfaces
> Hi! i'm tring to figure out how classes and dependencies > can be mapped to llvm. > [snip] > how do i encode a function that takes "base" type > so that it also takes "derived" ? You'll notice that your function doesn't take an object of type base, but a pointer to it. This is important - in a language such as LLVM where actual structures can be
2005 Aug 25
5
[LLVMdev] Mapping of class derivated and interfaces
Hi! i'm tring to figure out how classes and dependencies can be mapped to llvm. I've read on docs that nesting can be used: class base { int Y; }; class derived : base { short Z; }; becomes: %base = type { int } %derived = type { %base, short } That's ok, but now the question is: how do i encode a function that takes "base" type so that it also takes "derived"