search for: epistemolog

...on Messmer wrote: >> https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html > With respect citing another person's or people's opinion in support of > your own is not evidence in the sense I understand the word to mean. I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). > The assertion expressed in the link given above that 90-day > certificate lives will serve to increase certificate renewal > automation is at...

...-serving and unrealistic view of the value of formal inference in quantifying true scientific uncertainty when we do such exploration -- and that there is therefore something fundamentally contradictory in our own rhetoric and methods. Taking a larger view, I think this remark is part of the deeper epistemological issue of characterizing what can be scientifically "known" or, indeed, defining the difference between science and art, say. My own view is that scientific certainty is a fruitless concept: we build models that we benchmark against our subjective measurements (as the measurements them...

On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 15:39 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. > This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's > foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). The same Mozilla Foundation that got USD 50 million from Google some years ago and the same Mozilla Foundation that automatically sends URLs to...

On Sat, June 18, 2016 6:50 pm, Always Learning wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 15:39 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. >> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's >> foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). > > The same Mozilla Foundation that got USD 50 million from Google some > years ago and the same Mozilla Foundation that automati...

...t scrapers in general) are likely to be run periodically, mechanize should try to maintain this kind of state between runs, don''t you think? You might see a patch from me, unless someone beats me to it. [1] http://fishbowl.pastiche.org/2002/10/21/http_conditional_get_for_rss_hackers -- epistemological humility Chris Riddoch

...; https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html >> With respect citing another person's or people's opinion in support >> of >> your own is not evidence in the sense I understand the word to mean. > > I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. > This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's > foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). Really? Then why did you forward your reply a private message to a public mailing list if not to do exactly what you claim you wish to avoid? &gt...

Hi, I''m having some trouble downloading a .csv file from a particular website. The file isn''t part of a url, you need to click on a link in order to get the file sent. I don''t know how to get mechanize to correctly identify that. Here is the link to the file I''m trying to retrieve: <td style="vertical-align: bottom; text-align: center;">

"in non linear modelling finding appropriate starting values is something like an art"... (maybe from somewhere in Crawley , 2007) Here a colleague and I just want to compare different response models to a null model. This has worked OK for almost all the other data sets except that one (dumped below). Whatever our trials and algorithms, even subsetting data (to check if some singular

...helpful than academic. So... got any ideas for a project within this scope that would directly benefit Ogg Vorbis development? Changing topics is possible, though it would be preferable for it to have a strong linguistic element so I can use the project for both classes. -- Chris Riddoch | epistemological socket@peakpeak.com | humility --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subj...

On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on epistemology. >> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the world's >> foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, Mozilla, etc). > Really? Then why did you forward your reply a private message to a > public mailing list if not to do exactly what you claim you wi...

I have an example where escaping "." does not seem to be behaving consistently, but perhaps it is due to my misunderstanding. Could someone explain to me why the below produces the output it does? It seems to me that in the second example, where I am being more precise about specifying that a "." (dot) should be between the numbers, should produce the same output as the first

...ienced that "free market economy" is currently the only common language > which most civil servants at the European Commission understand. In order to > let them understand your point of view and take it into account, it is > compulsory to speak their language. Arguments based on epistemology, ethics or > history are acceptable but have in general no positive impact on the European > Commission because only few people will understand them. > > 3- DAVOS COMPATIBLE - Imagine that you are introducing your point of > view at the Davos Economic Forum in front of CEOs who wi...

Hello everybody I want to compare the proportions of germinated seeds (seed batches of size 10) of three plant types (1,2,3) with a glm with binomial data (following the method in Crawley: Statistics,an introduction using R, p.247). The problem seems to be that in two plant types (2,3) all plants have proportions = 0. I give you my data and the model I'm running: success failure

On Mon, June 20, 2016 13:16, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> >>> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on >>> epistemology. >>> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the >>> world's foremost experts in the field (Akamai, Cisco, EFF, >>> Mozilla, etc). I would rather look to Bruce Schneier and Noam Chomsky for guidance before I would take security advice from organisa...