search for: epel9

...L 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9. >>>> >>>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client >>>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978 >>>> >>>> You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9. >>>> >>>> [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/ >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Phil >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>...

...seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9. > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978 > > > > You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9. > > > > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/ > > > > Regards > > > > Phil > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > htt...

Dear R-core, I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. Thanks. [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2...

...ted. (CC Luke in case there is more to it) - pd > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Dear R-core, > > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. > Thanks. > > [1] https://...

This may provide the answer you are looking for: it's being deprecated in favor of Cockpit. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030592 On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 6:58 AM G?nther J. Niederwimmer <gjn at gjn.priv.at> wrote: > hello list, > > I switched to version 9 (not redhat) on my "new" server, and that worked. > But > after updating to 9.1, the

...case there is more to it) | | - pd | | > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: | > | > Dear R-core, | > | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem | > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if | > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits | > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. | > Thanks. | > | >...

...package for CentOS9 Stream? > Hi, The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978 You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/ Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** Associations: * Debian Maintainer (DM) * Fedora/EPEL Maintainer. * Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation. WWW: https://kathenas.org Buy Me a Coffe...

...gt; | > | > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > | > > | > Dear R-core, > | > > | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's > Bugzilla. We > | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no > problem > | > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if > | > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the > commits > | > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. >...

I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years. C7 is getting close to end of life. Time to upgrade to C9 ... But I cannot find a package for the boinc client. "dnf search boinc" returns nothing. I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories. Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream? -- =============== Bill Gee

...Hi, > > The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978 > > You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9. > > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/ > > Regards > > Phil > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hmmmm.........

...r but at least people would be aware that distro itself is EOL and that they shouldn't expect to receive any update anymore # CentOS mailing-lists Currently running on mailman2 stack, on top of CentOS 7 linux : there is WIP to port everything to up2date mailman3 stack, actually packaged for EPEL9. We have successfully imported archives into mailman3 and same for lists config but let's start a different/separate thread to discuss changes (like renaming lists, see next coming thread) Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrf...

...st people would be aware that distro itself is EOL and that they shouldn't expect to receive any update anymore > > # CentOS mailing-lists > Currently running on mailman2 stack, on top of CentOS 7 linux : there is WIP to port everything to up2date mailman3 stack, actually packaged for EPEL9. > We have successfully imported archives into mailman3 and same for lists config but let's start a different/separate thread to discuss changes (like renaming lists, see next coming thread) > > Kind Regards, > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | https://www.cen...

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792141 Let the user pass "-oo" options from the kernel cmdline and from the GUI to virt-v2v. This is primarily useful with the OpenStack output mode, so reenable that mode. Cc: Alban Lecorps <alban.lecorps at ubisoft.com> Laszlo Alban Lecorps (1): Introduce "p2v.output.misc" for passing "-oo" options