search for: epel6

Greetings, I have a centos 5.7 (2.6.18-274.12.1.el5) server with mock (mock-1.0.25-1.el5) installed. When initialize epel-6 chroot in centos 5.7 it failed, below are the snippet of error in the terminal output, ... ... rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by mingetty-1.08-5.el6.x86_64 rpmlib(FileDigests) is needed by popt-1.13-7.el6.i686 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by popt-1.13-7.el6.i686

On 8 March 2016 at 19:36, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856 > >>> > >>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock > >> ... > >>> got to be down to how the build roots are constructed. > >>> > >>> Decided to do a quick test of something given how EPEL has adjusted > >> macros > >>> recently to reduce boilerplate between Fedora and itsel...

...gt; >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20EPEL&version=el6&component=mock > >>> > >>> I don't see any existing bug that would seem to apply ... > >>> > >>> You can see the build completes with a target of epel6 on an F23 > install > >>> but a clean C6 install that uses the mock from epel6 fails: > >>> > >>> http://pastebin.centos.org/41116/ > >>> > >>> Can't see anything that differs in the output from that to explain why > >> the...

...d > in > > EPEL > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20EPEL&version=el6&component=mock > > > > I don't see any existing bug that would seem to apply ... > > > > You can see the build completes with a target of epel6 on an F23 install > > but a clean C6 install that uses the mock from epel6 fails: > > > > http://pastebin.centos.org/41116/ > > > > Can't see anything that differs in the output from that to explain why > the > > Makefile isn't regenerated on the epel6...

...a we're turning our attention to the EPEL users. > >> > >> Unfortunately EL6's use of php53 means we cannot update any further there given the minimum requirement of php54. > >> > >> As such the maintenance update of 7.0.13 that is in epel-testing now for EPEL6 will be the final one there to be followed by the retiring of the package. > >> > >> If you wish to update from that please either migrate to an EL7 base system or switch to the OwnCloud upstream packages which make use of SCL to satisfy the php54+ requirement. > >> >...

...t; okay looks like you've uncovered an bug in mock that should be reported in EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20EPEL&version=el6&component=mock I don't see any existing bug that would seem to apply ... You can see the build completes with a target of epel6 on an F23 install but a clean C6 install that uses the mock from epel6 fails: http://pastebin.centos.org/41116/ Can't see anything that differs in the output from that to explain why the Makefile isn't regenerated on the epel6 mock unlike the F23 one. Right now I don't have time to l...

....el6.anvil.x86_64.rpm > > The source is there, and I would be surprised if it didn't build > easily on EL7. > > https://alteeve.ca/an-repo/el6/SRPMS/iperf-2.0.5-11.el6.anvil.src.rpm +1 for iperf, and it's available on EPEL also https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/ EPEL6 has iperf and iperf3 while EPEL7 has just iperf3. netperf is also very good, but it's more complex to use and I'm not aware of packages for it. Marcelo

...up to date in Fedora we're turning our attention to the EPEL users. >> >> Unfortunately EL6's use of php53 means we cannot update any further there given the minimum requirement of php54. >> >> As such the maintenance update of 7.0.13 that is in epel-testing now for EPEL6 will be the final one there to be followed by the retiring of the package. >> >> If you wish to update from that please either migrate to an EL7 base system or switch to the OwnCloud upstream packages which make use of SCL to satisfy the php54+ requirement. >> >> On the EPEL...

...EL >>> >>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20EPEL&version=el6&component=mock >>> >>> I don't see any existing bug that would seem to apply ... >>> >>> You can see the build completes with a target of epel6 on an F23 install >>> but a clean C6 install that uses the mock from epel6 fails: >>> >>> http://pastebin.centos.org/41116/ >>> >>> Can't see anything that differs in the output from that to explain why >> the >>> Makefile isn't re...

...a we're turning our attention to the EPEL users. > >> > >> Unfortunately EL6's use of php53 means we cannot update any further there given the minimum requirement of php54. > >> > >> As such the maintenance update of 7.0.13 that is in epel-testing now for EPEL6 will be the final one there to be followed by the retiring of the package. > >> > >> If you wish to update from that please either migrate to an EL7 base system or switch to the OwnCloud upstream packages which make use of SCL to satisfy the php54+ requirement. > >> >...

...ered an bug in mock that should be reported in > EPEL > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20EPEL&version=el6&component=mock > > I don't see any existing bug that would seem to apply ... > > You can see the build completes with a target of epel6 on an F23 install > but a clean C6 install that uses the mock from epel6 fails: > > http://pastebin.centos.org/41116/ > > Can't see anything that differs in the output from that to explain why the > Makefile isn't regenerated on the epel6 mock unlike the F23 one. > &...

Hi all, anyone know when lxde will be available for centos? Fedora lxde was nice but its end of life is far to short for a server. Thanks Gary.

Hello, I've got a Thinkpad T420 and would like to use full tlp functionality. Therefore I need the kernel module tp_smapi and acpi_call. Have a look right here: http://linrunner.de/en/tlp/docs/tlp-linux-advanced-power-management.html#installation There are only fedora related packages but none for RHEL/CentOS. Should I install that repo and hardcode the mirror to the fc21 repo? Regards Tim

Our current build process requires the directfb-1.4.11-3.el6.i686.rpm and directfb-devel-1.4.11-3.el6.i686.rpm packages, but they appear to be no longer available from the EPEL repo, and I can?t find them anywhere else either. If you have a local copy, or can point me to some other repo or web site that has these 2 RPMs, I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Alfred

...e from the official Fedora repositories: > > tlp (Updates) ? Power saving > tlp-rdw (Updates) ? optional, Radio Device Wizard > >Install the above packages with the command (in a root shell): >yum install tlp tlp-rdw > >Note: packages for RHEL/CentOS are available from EPEL6/7 repositories. >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >BR, Bob > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

It turns out augeas on RHEL6 is 0.7.2, which does not have ''setm'' command available. ''setm'' is available in augeas release 0.8, which is available in EPEL, but not available for RHEL6 (the reason is the package is already in RHEL6, thus no package would be released in EPEL for this. All I want to do is to put console=ttyS0 on all kernel lines in /etc/grub.conf.

On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was

...nd 21 TLP packages are available from the official Fedora repositories: tlp (Updates) ? Power saving tlp-rdw (Updates) ? optional, Radio Device Wizard Install the above packages with the command (in a root shell): yum install tlp tlp-rdw Note: packages for RHEL/CentOS are available from EPEL6/7 repositories. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ BR, Bob

...urce is there, and I would be surprised if it didn't build >> easily on EL7. >> >> https://alteeve.ca/an-repo/el6/SRPMS/iperf-2.0.5-11.el6.anvil.src.rpm > >> > +1 for iperf, and it's available on EPEL also > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/ EPEL6 has iperf and > iperf3 while EPEL7 has just iperf3. > > netperf is also very good, but it's more complex to use and I'm > not aware of packages for it. > > Marcelo I most likely compiled it from the EPEL repo, so I'd say to go get it there, not from my repo. Cheers...

On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856 >>> >>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock >> ... >>> got to be down to how the build roots are constructed. >>> >>> Decided to do a quick test of something given how EPEL has adjusted >> macros >>> recently to reduce boilerplate between Fedora and itself ... >>> >>&gt...