search for: entirety

....00 This was ran after the files were originally copied and some minor changes were made to each of them. It appears that the amount of data transfered ("wrote") is almost the same as the total size of all the files, which leads me to believe that all the files were transferred in their entirety. I specified the "no-write" option to see if it would make a difference to no avail. I also tried this with just one text file, and got the same type of output. Am I interpreting the output wrong, or all the files indeed being transferred in their entirety? If so, is there a way to...

...ion. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, dissemination, distribution, copying, storage or other use of all or any portion of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message in its entirety. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

hi, novice question - is replication supposed to replicate maildir in it's entirety? I get new mails replicated but not operations of removal/deletion, is this normal? many thanks

I am having some issues (e.g. System lock ups) with my ATI 9250 Video card. I am thinging about replacing it with either a Nvidia FX5200, FX5500, or a FX5600 card. Is anyone using one of these cards on Centos 4.1 with the stock (XORG) nv driver? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...liable for any unauthorized disclosure. It is intended solely for the addressee. Unless you are the addressee, you may not read, copy, use or store this e-mail in any way, or permit others to. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the message in its entirety, including any attachments * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was...

...;xl list -l" displays domain ids as -1 when using SXP, irrespective of actual value. Ian C identified that this issue was likely fixed in the upcoming 4.3 release but the commit responsible for the fix (a73a7a0c647a9a5e30d8bc473c0a1e8648817183) was not likely a candidate for backporting in its entirety. Therefore, this patch is just an isolation of the hunk to fix the above issue. Original Commit Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Backport Created-by: Ian Murray <murrayie@yahoo.co.uk> --- tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 delet...

...TRUE FALSE 5 TRUE FALSE FALSE 6 TRUE FALSE FALSE 7 FALSE FALSE FALSE 8 FALSE TRUE FALSE 9 FALSE TRUE FALSE 10 FALSE FALSE FALSE Converting the the file from ISO-latin-1 to UTF8 (with Mac's TextEdit application)allows the file to be read in in its entirety, but still the Scandinavian character in the heading is coerced to a period '.', or two, in fact (i.e. 'mietti?' -> 'miett..') Have I possibly misunderstood how the 'file' function should be used in conjunction with 'read.table', or might the problem w...

...; subregister > intervals contain at least all of the range information that was > contained > in any eliminated intervals when those eliminated intervals were > coalesced > to the subregister's superregister? Right. The code is being conservative. It's saying all of the entirety of the superregister's live interval must also be in the subregister's live interval. i.e. When the superregister is live, the subregister must be live. Evan > > > If not, which is this code supposed to be doing? > > -Da...

...en PXEBaseCode and UDPv4ServiceBinding protocols, > but this does not happen in what I consider your faulty FW. > i.e. > if we consider > PXEBaseCode handle 267 -> MAC 0065F36E00EE More importantly: look at the actual captured text. It does NOT specify a valid MAC in its entirety and leaves off the leading nibble (11 characters, not 12). Handle 267 shows "065F36E00EE" not "0065F36E00EE". > UDPv4ServiceBinding handle 23E -> MAC 5065F36E00EE > > You can see the MACs are "almost" identical but there's not match! > While 5065F...

...... if (cond) continue; ... } into two nested loops. Specifically, the "continue" branch would go back to the loop header making it appear as if there were two back edges. What are your thoughts about either making the CFG simplification aware of loops in its entirety, or separating the "safe" transformations in a quick pass, and having a more aggressive pass that does preserve loop structure? -Krzysztof -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

...redecessor for the header (i.e. the latch block), but it doesn't seem to be account for the fact that the latch block has already been combined into the header's chain. Unless I'm misreading something, we *should* be able to merge the loop chain with the preheader chain in it's entirety right? At least one on example I've looked at, adding an early exit from BadCFGConflict loop when Pred and Succ are part of the same chain does appear to give the expected result, but I don't understand the code well enough to reason about whether that is generally a correct thing to do...

...t it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to UK legal entities. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...t it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to UK legal entities. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, Has anyone implemented trunk to trunk forwarding with an asterisk PBX. For the purpose I have in mind its quite important that once the call has been sent onwards to the new desination the lines into the PBX are no longer held. If anyone has UK-specific experience of getting this up and running that would be incredibly useful! Nic

...s during file transfer. I've run a network analyzer on the tftp transfer, and can see that the transfer stops after 65535 blocks have been transferred, which is the usual limit for tftp. I understand that this is a tftp limit. However, this same limit is not encountered by pxelinux.0 and the entirety of the large file makes it through just fine, and then proceeds to boot just fine. Can someone please confirm if there is a known or intentional difference in pxelinux.0 vs. syslinux.efi as far as tftp file size limits? Thanks, John

...liable for any unauthorized disclosure. It is intended solely for the addressee. Unless you are the addressee, you may not read, copy, use or store this e-mail in any way, or permit others to. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the message in its entirety, including any attachments * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was...

...he application I want to invoke is FastAGI. The Originate AMI command works correctly, but Asterisk generates a very short (0-1s) duration for the CDR that results from this call, regardless of the time spent running the FastAGI application. I want the CDR duration to reflect the time spent in the entirety of the call, as is normal for ordinary calls. What should I do? I am running Asterisk 11.25.3 .

...ue by building llvm/clang on Windows myself and running CPack to produce a complete NSIS package (weighing in at ~77MB). Is there a motivation behind the stripping of this package against tool developers? I'd like users to clone my tool source and build it quickly without building llvm in its entirety. This issue isn't critical, just a curiosity I have. Thanks! -Jacko

...t it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to UK legal entities. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...le on the scaffold command 1.2 Edit the migration file by following the "do |t| ... end" with the command: change_column :whatever :money_field, :amount, :decimal, :precision => 10, :scale => 2 I think this approach worked for me 2.1 Omit the money_field in it''s entirety 2.2 Create a second migration file an add the command: add_column :whatever :money_field, :amount, :decimal, :precision => 10, :scale => 2 I''m guessing this will work as well BTW, I''m running Rails 2.3.5, Ruby 1.8.6, WinXP-Pro/SP3, Firefox 3.6.2, Firebug 1.5.3, My...