search for: entication

I'm having problems getting Asterisk SIP to register with an Entice softswitch SIP Gateway. My provider tells me that all thats needed is a user name, password and the IP address and to register and it needs to be using MD5 authentication. I continualy get a "603 Decline" message. The provider of the gateway says they are not receiving any authentication information. Registration using Sipura SPA2000 works fine and so does X-Lite but not Asterisk. I know and have tested to see that its not a NAT problem. I have successfu...

Hi, I'm considering submitting a project for this year's Google Summer of Code program that would involve making progress on hardware accelerated video decoding for the nouveau driver and wanted some feedback. I know that this isn't a big priority at the moment amongst the regular contributors, but I think it would make a good GSOC project because of it's somewhat narrow scope. I

>>>>> Avraham Adler >>>>> on Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:38:12 -0500 writes: > Those of us stuck on Windows but who attempt to develop properly are > wounded to the quick, sir! > :) > Avi Indeed, you had a ' :) ' , but others have perceived this as an insult. I'm really really sorry for that and do want to apologize to all of

I was wondering what peoples thoughts are about this. It seem that * works just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4. Maybe a few small issues here and there but generally it seems to me that * is just as stable on either platform. 2.4 is the obvious choice for the highest possiblility of a stable well tested environment but 2.6 seems to have some enticing benefits. Can Linux 2.6 be considered a

Hi everyone, I’m working with the LLVM C API now. I see that several functions are deprecated, however the only notion is in comments around the function. Is there any specific reason why __attribute__((deprecated)) is omitted? Will it make sense to send a patch with such additions? -- AlexDenisov Software Engineer, http://lowlevelbits.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

I am v v newbie, want to get to grips with linux but mostly interested in using the PC; so the idea of wine appeals a lot. from what I see you generally have to build or compile or something it. Is there a rpm package, if I am using the term correctly, like a windows self-installing thing, i.e. one single file I can download, click on, it goes thru a (preferably non-interactive, I am happy

uname -a Linux asterisk 2.6.10-1.1771_FC2smp # 1 SMP Mon Mar 20 01:10:51 EST i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Processing hundreds of calls & faxes a day. No problem. If you are going to use a Fedora box make sure you yum update right after install then the kernel sources symbolic link is not horribly broken as it used to be. Otherwise, just go. -----Original Message----- From: canuck15 To:

Oh another thing, consider this question that some people will be asking: Why not use GCC to do what LLVM does, and skip the hassle of using LLVM entirely? ESPECIALLY considering that LLVM cannot be used without GCC. Even if you are using LLVM as a back-end only, for compiling LLVM bytecode only, GCC is still required to convert the "llc" output assembly .S file into a

On 2 March 2015 at 09:09, Duncan Murdoch wrote: | I generally recommend that people use Rcpp, which hides a lot of the | details. It will generate your .Call calls for you, and generate the | C++ code that receives them; you just need to think about the real | problem, not the interface. It has its own learning curve, but I think | it is easier than using the low-level code that you need to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Welcome to the first release of the 3.1.0 development branch. This is an unstable release series intended only for use by testers and developers. We make no claims as to whether it even works. The purpose of the 3.1.x releases is similar to what we've used the 'alpha' tag for in the past. These are unstable, development releases that

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Welcome to the first release of the 3.1.0 development branch. This is an unstable release series intended only for use by testers and developers. We make no claims as to whether it even works. The purpose of the 3.1.x releases is similar to what we've used the 'alpha' tag for in the past. These are unstable, development releases that

On 03/02/2015 04:37 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: > >> On 2 March 2015 at 09:09, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> | I generally recommend that people use Rcpp, which hides a lot of the >> | details. It will generate your .Call calls for you, and generate the >> | C++ code that receives them; you just need to think about the real >> | problem, not the interface. It has its

On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:53:05AM +0100, Jonas Gustavsson wrote: > I have been looking at the LLVM project for quite a bit but I was > wondering if there are any implication of using the project in a > commercial enviroment in terms of licensing restrictions and other > related issues, are there other people that use LLVM in a commecial > enviroment? LLVM's license is a

Summary: We need to find a reviewer for our implementation of Ball-Laurus path profiling. It is well known that path profiling generates more precise information about a program's behaviour than edge profiling. We are conducting a research project with the goal of developing a methodology to make feedback-directed optimization (FDO) more sound. We are developing combined profiles that enable

Hello! I have been looking at the LLVM project for quite a bit but I was wondering if there are any implication of using the project in a commercial enviroment in terms of licensing restrictions and other related issues, are there other people that use LLVM in a commecial enviroment? Regards Jonas Gustavsson

.... I don't believe it could access the passphrase which should never leave the client. I presume it could capture the public key, which could be read from the filesystem anyway. And I presume it could capture traffic to/from the virtual terminal. Is there any way for an attacker to replay authentication to a third machine, accessed via the compromised machine using ssh-agent ? If a user connects to a compromised machine using keys, but from an untainted client, do they need to change their keys or passphrase ? (I presume, in principle, that an attacker could steal private user keys and machin...

In addition, there are groups at STMicroelectronics and at Siemens that have used or are considering using LLVM. Note that these are internal development projects for now -- they (and Apple) have not publicly announced products based on LLVM. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Feb 14, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at

R Friends, I'm running R2.7.1 on Windows XP. I'm trying to get some lattice functionality which I have not seen previously documented--I'd like to plot the exact same data in multiple panels but changing the grouping variable each time so that each panel highlights a different feature of the data set. The following code does exactly that with a simple and fabricated air quality data

On 2 March 2015 at 16:37, Martin Maechler wrote: | | > On 2 March 2015 at 09:09, Duncan Murdoch wrote: | > | I generally recommend that people use Rcpp, which hides a lot of the | > | details. It will generate your .Call calls for you, and generate the | > | C++ code that receives them; you just need to think about the real | > | problem, not the interface. It has its own

Hmm...well, after it gets the report descriptor, NUT then gets each of the reports defined in there, so that's good. But after that, there are no more messages (no more reports being requested...the NUT debug info just shows "libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out" repeatedly). I put in some enticing values into the report descriptor, like shutdownimminent and discharging and