search for: enteprise

> About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to > CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force to pay for enteprise system > currently I will pay RHEL, not OL. Over this, OL is not the only > enterprise distro that a "user" could choose. If support is needed there > are SUSE (SLES) and Ubuntu. For who that don't need support there are > Debian, Ubuntu, OpenSUSE (I'm talking abou...

hello, i just got introduced to R - WOW its beautiful.. I am presently a SAS user and wanted to configure R to work in a multi-user enteprise environment. Client - Server. Where we have a strong LINUX server supporting about 10 statisticians with R. Anyone have any backround or information they can share to help me get jump-started on setting up R in this environment? Does each user have their own worksession with the serving executi...

Hey guys, Since the deployment, in production, of my brand new `Samba4 AC DC` (Ubuntu 14.04.1), I was using regularly the "Windows 2008 R2 Enteprise" (also brand new installation - no I.E. installed) software called "DNS Manager", to manage my `Samba4 + Bind9` couple but, since today, out of nothing, the "DNS Manager" does not work anymore, I'm seeing the following error when I try to "update, or delete" a...

Hello All, My system is built on a dual Athlon box using Redhat 9. From time to time there are problems with the phone system that are hard top track down and sseem to be resolved with just a simple reboot. I read somewhere that Linux loves teh Intel platform and that on AMD it is not as good. Is this true or just hooey? If so, would I get more reliability by dumping the AMD box in favor of

...hat type of problem (CVE) it suffers and do my reasoning for an update process. This is a missing for me but I still use centos and I should not need a RHEL account to access to get advisories and see what applies on CentOS (6,7,8 and Stream). Many of us, choose CentOS due to its stability and enteprise-ready feature (and because is partially/enterely backed by RH). Due to actual problem, many server and workstation died and it's normal that some user said "A lot of trust has been destroyed." because they placed a lot of trust on the pro-redhat support. On the other side, all of...

We submitted bug 3342 on Dec. 20th, Too many open files. It has not moved from the new state. So lets try here. We have Dell Quad Xeon server that we end up rebooting about every 2-3 weeks when the number of open samba files sky rockets. The system is a ClearCase server system. We have been monitoring this system for a few months now and are not able to pin down a cause to this issue. The system

Il 17/06/20 15:42, Scott Robbins ha scritto: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: >> >>> About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to >>> CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force to pay for enteprise system >>> currently I will pay RHEL, not OL. Over this, OL is not the only >>> enterprise distro that a "user" could choose. If support is needed there >>> are SUSE (SLES) and Ubuntu. For who that don't need support there are >>> Debian, Ubuntu, Op...

...CVE) it suffers and do my reasoning for an update process. This > is a missing for me but I still use centos and I should not need a RHEL > account to access to get advisories and see what applies on CentOS > (6,7,8 and Stream). > > Many of us, choose CentOS due to its stability and enteprise-ready > feature (and because is partially/enterely backed by RH). Due to actual > problem, many server and workstation died and it's normal that some user > said "A lot of trust has been destroyed." because they placed a lot of > trust on the pro-redhat support. On the oth...

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to > > CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force to pay for enteprise system > > currently I will pay RHEL, not OL. Over this, OL is not the only > > enterprise distro that a "user" could choose. If support is needed there > > are SUSE (SLES) and Ubuntu. For who that don't need support there are > > Debian, Ubuntu, OpenSUSE (...

Vista Ultimate by Eric Lindblad http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com Email: GeirfuglApS <at> yahoo.com I there anyone with a 32 bit Vista Ultimate (or Enteprise) box who would be willing to download from MS & install 'Utilities and SDK for UNIX-based Applications_X86.exe', compile & install make-3.81 as gmake in /usr, compile & install m4-1.4.9 as gm4 in /usr, compile & install a patched libuuid-1.0.3.tar.gz (see below link), comp...

...CVE) it suffers and do my reasoning for an update process. This > is a missing for me but I still use centos and I should not need a RHEL > account to access to get advisories and see what applies on CentOS > (6,7,8 and Stream). > > Many of us, choose CentOS due to its stability and enteprise-ready > feature (and because is partially/enterely backed by RH). Due to actual > problem, many server and workstation died and it's normal that some user > said "A lot of trust has been destroyed." because they placed a lot of > trust on the pro-redhat support. On the oth...

...not so good for a server. If the theory "unspoken truth" is real I don't like how RH is trying to encourage me to switch to RHEL and this is a bad way to do this. About Oracle as alternative. Oracle Linux is not an alternative to CentOS but for RHEL and if I will force to pay for enteprise system currently I will pay RHEL, not OL. Over this, OL is not the only enterprise distro that a "user" could choose. If support is needed there are SUSE (SLES) and Ubuntu. For who that don't need support there are Debian, Ubuntu, OpenSUSE (I'm talking about the most used but...

...do my reasoning for an update process. This >> is a missing for me but I still use centos and I should not need a RHEL >> account to access to get advisories and see what applies on CentOS >> (6,7,8 and Stream). >> >> Many of us, choose CentOS due to its stability and enteprise-ready >> feature (and because is partially/enterely backed by RH). Due to actual >> problem, many server and workstation died and it's normal that some user >> said "A lot of trust has been destroyed." because they placed a lot of >> trust on the pro-redhat sup...

...y reasoning for an update process. This > > is a missing for me but I still use centos and I should not need a RHEL > > account to access to get advisories and see what applies on CentOS > > (6,7,8 and Stream). > > > > Many of us, choose CentOS due to its stability and enteprise-ready > > feature (and because is partially/enterely backed by RH). Due to actual > > problem, many server and workstation died and it's normal that some user > > said "A lot of trust has been destroyed." because they placed a lot of > > trust on the pro-redhat...

...ts A user id is unique, so there is only a "john_doe" in the ldap tree (I repeat, there is NOT uid=john_doe,o=us.es,dc=us,dc=es and uid=john_doe,o=alum.us.es,dc=us,dc=es). Below you will find a copy of the dovecot.conf and dovecot-ldap.conf. Our operating system is Red Hat Enteprise Linux 5 x64. These are our questions: 1) We are unable to make dbox work with quota, but we have no problem with maildir. Quota is stored in a ldap attibute called "mailQuota" 2) A user can be in different branches in the same time: for example, a teacher called pepito...

Hi, I just read this blog article from austrian Linux expert Michael Kofler. For those among you who don't know the guy, he's my home country's number one Linux expert (known as "der Kofler") and most notably the author of a series of excellent books about Linux over the last 25 years. https://kofler.info/centos-8-wertlose-langzeitunterstuetzung/ Disclaimer : I've been

> Am 01.08.2020 um 23:52 schrieb Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos at centos.org>: > > ?Am 01.08.20 um 23:41 schrieb Kay Schenk: >> Well misery loves company but still...just truly unfathomable! >> Time for a change. > > > I can only express my incomprehension for such statements! > > Stay and help. Instead running away or should I say out of the >

Hello list, I have troubles with the daily backup of a modest filesystem which tends to take more that 10 hours. I have ext4 all over the place on ~200 servers and never ran into such a problem. The filesystem capacity is 300 GB (19,6M inodes) with 196 GB (9,3M inodes) used. It's mounted 'defaults,noatime'. It sits on a hardware RAID array thru plain LVM slices. The RAID array is