search for: entadsl

Hello to everybody, We want integrate in a router/firewall (Debian Based, 2.6 Kernel), an HTB shaper. The goal is to divide the traffic for classes of workstations, at example in three classes, let say A, B and C. Example: A 70 Mb/s B 20 Mb/s C 10 Mb/s If B don''t make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the rest at B We have used CBQ and HTB, with poor succes. Anybody

How can i redirect all traffic that not come from port 80 to a flow ? i was thing about some like tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 7 u32 match ip sport !80 ...... But this not work. Another doubt, if i have two rules that intersects , for example , one filter with u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 and other with u32 match sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11 , which one will

In 2.4 kernels, there was a [bp]fifo that could be implemented with ''tc add'', but in 2.6 kernels, I find no way to create either of these fifos. I am able to increase txqueuelen. What I desire is a larger number of backlogged packetes before drops occur. How can the output buffer size be increased for HTB? -- gypsy

Hello everyone, We are working on HTB with TC and would like some clarifications from your part. Our example is as follows. We have one HTB root class and two HTB classes attached to it, as in this figure : 1: HTB | | |

Hi all, I''m having a hell of a time getting my IFB to work. I know I''ve done this before, so I''m missing something stupid. Can anybody tell me what it might be? Configs as follows: -------- #!/bin/sh modprobe ifb numifbs=1000 modprobe act_mirred modprobe 8021q brctl addbr br0 brctl setfd br0 0 brctl stp br0 off brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl addif br0 eth2 ifconfig eth1

Hi all :) I''ve been using a tc setup for almost two years, but at some point (probably when I switched to kernel 2.6.x, but I''m not sure) it has started making something very weird. For a certain class, the rate is 125000bit and the ceil is 270000bit, but the fastest rate I get is about 75-80000bit, instead of the "promised" 125000, *with no other traffic in

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

Hello, I''ve just compiled the kernel 2.6.17 and noticed an odd HTB behaviour. For instance: tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 1kbit ceil 750Kbit burst 15k tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 15 u32 match ip dst 192.168.5.1 classid 1:30 The filter works ok and the traffic to 192.168.5.1 flows through the class 1:30, but the rate gets much higher than

Hi. I can''t find any documentation on the specific selectors for tc-filters -- what documentation I have says they are in Polish in a file called selectors.html -- is there anything around in English to see those? Thanks. -- Your life is like a penny. You''re going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com

Is IFB realy replacement of IMQ Please Guide -- Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hello, Some time ago I''ve read somewhere that local traffic in IMQ could hung up the whole system but it was corrected long time ago. So I was very surprised yesterday when it occurred not true. While testing IMQ I''ve observed for some time that - if you tag some local traffic with iptables both in pre- and postrouting - kernel is hunging up. It is happening quite quick with

Hi all :) I think that this issue has already been discussed on this list, but google didn''t find anything interesting, so I''m bringing the subject again. The output of "tc" uses "b" meaning "byte" and "bit" for "bit". The "official" suffixes for those units are "B" and "b", respectively,

Hi all, First, let me say I''ve been most impressed with how quickly and professionally people on this list ask and answer questions. Next, let me say that with which I need help is properly configuring strict PQ, and gathering certain stats. Specifically: - I need to create a priority queue with four queues (let''s say they are of high, medium, normal, and low priority) - I

Hi, With kernel 2.4 I was able to use equalize to send our outgoing packets to two different routers (our isp supports this setup), like this: ip route add default src ip.a.dd.rr equalize nexthop via <router1> weight 1 nexthop via <router2> weight 1 The two routes were used equally on a per packet basis, not per flow or per cached route, but per packet, each line has 800k upload

I''m just-so-fresh to the list, so hello everyone. I''m having a realy hard time with setting up very simple bandwidth management. What I am trying to do is setup a 10Mbit interface to send at only 1920kbit to most of the network (to make sure it hardly ever tops 2mbit). I did succeed with the ingress traffic... With egress however, I get very odd results at different speeds. With

Pablo Fernandes Yahoo wrote: > Hi Andy and All, > > Thank you so much for your explain. I really apreciated it. I was thiking > about this UDP question and bandwidth shaping... i saw the same udp > connections pass through the shaping of the cable modem and CBQ in a linux > box. As I said I''ve not used CBQ - The LARTC section does say it is hard to configure and may

I recently upgraded my gateway to a pIII 600 with a zyxel 4 port nic (tulip) and bridge eth0 and eth1, eth0 is a crossover cable to my PC eth1 a switch. I don''t have ifconfig on this box (LFS) and couldn''t find any examples of bridging using ip - maybe this is relevant maybe not - I''ve tried a few combinations of different orders of setting things up. Is there a magic