Is IFB realy replacement of IMQ Please Guide -- Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Rajesh Mahajan wrote:> Is IFB realy replacement of IMQMostly - it hooks before/after netfilter though, so if you really need IMQ to hook "in" netfilter (eg. to get denatted addresses on ingress so you can seperate INPUT and FORWARD traffic), you still need IMQ. Andy.
can u please explain where IFB really place in linux network stack Is iptables rules applicable on it On 7/19/06, Andy Furniss <lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com> wrote:> Rajesh Mahajan wrote: > > Is IFB realy replacement of IMQ > > Mostly - it hooks before/after netfilter though, so if you really need > IMQ to hook "in" netfilter (eg. to get denatted addresses on ingress so > you can seperate INPUT and FORWARD traffic), you still need IMQ. > > Andy. >
Rajesh Mahajan wrote:> can u please explain where IFB really place in linux network stack > > Is iptables rules applicable on itI don''t know exactly - as for iptables rules, you can use marks if you are hooking ifb on egress as it''s after netfilter. I suppose what''s possible depends on your setup and what you need to do. Andy.