search for: enshrines

> >>>>> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> writes: > > PD> "Venables, Bill (CMIS, Cleveland)" <Bill.Venables at cmis.CSIRO.AU> > PD> writes: > >> The fact that every elementary book on statistics does it this way > >> does not make it correct. To be helpful, a histogram really

...15 +0200 > > > > drm/irq: Make pipe unsigned and name consistent > > > > Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a > > non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: > > > > - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight > > breakage of the userspace ABI. > > > > - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not > > pretty. > > > > - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until the next vblank > > interrupt, thereby making...

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote: >> We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap >> seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? > > Apparently Red Hat is well aware of the upcoming leap second:

Second test after big upgrade.. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... > > They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance on April 1 deserved fortune enshrinement. It reminded me of one

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:25 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Looking at build-procedure files for link-order hints is technically > "written down" but not really human-friendly and not at all what I had in > mind. J > > I get that writing it down on a doc page will have the usual bit-rot > problems, but if you want to tell developers

On 4/2/2016 11:07 AM, David Winsemius wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >>> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... >> They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? > Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance

...ry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Date: Wed Aug 12 17:00:31 2015 +0200 drm/irq: Make pipe unsigned and name consistent Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight breakage of the userspace ABI. - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not pretty. - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until the next vblank interrupt, thereby making it accurate. This patch implements the third option. Since having a...

...Make pipe unsigned and name consistent > >> > > >> > Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a > >> > non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: > >> > > >> > - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight > >> > breakage of the userspace ABI. > >> > > >> > - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not > >> > pretty. > >> > > >> > - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until t...

...ry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Date: Wed Aug 12 17:00:31 2015 +0200 drm/irq: Make pipe unsigned and name consistent Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight breakage of the userspace ABI. - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not pretty. - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until the next vblank interrupt, thereby making it accurate. This patch implements the third option. Since having a...

...ry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Date: Wed Aug 12 17:00:31 2015 +0200 drm/irq: Make pipe unsigned and name consistent Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight breakage of the userspace ABI. - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not pretty. - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until the next vblank interrupt, thereby making it accurate. This patch implements the third option. Since having a...

I wanted to present some of the particular reasons why I'm pretty strongly opposed to a purely flat layout of projects the way the current github 'llvm-project' repository looks, as that hasn't happened on the list yet. I'm replying to myself as I don't see a much better place to hang that conversation. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:38 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at

...:00:31 2015 +0200 >> >> drm/irq: Make pipe unsigned and name consistent >> >> Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a >> non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: >> >> - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight >> breakage of the userspace ABI. >> >> - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not >> pretty. >> >> - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until the next vblank >> interrupt, thereby making it ac...

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Bill Kelly via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: >> On 13 October 2015 at 17:16, Kuperstein, Michael M via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> The FreeBSD CoC is, IMHO, much better in this respect ( https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html ).

...> Date: Wed Aug 12 17:00:31 2015 +0200 > > drm/irq: Make pipe unsigned and name consistent > > Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a > non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: > > - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight > breakage of the userspace ABI. > > - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not > pretty. > > - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until the next vblank > interrupt, thereby making it accurate. > > This patch...

...t;> > drm/irq: Make pipe unsigned and name consistent >> > >> > Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a >> > non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: >> > >> > - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight >> > breakage of the userspace ABI. >> > >> > - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not >> > pretty. >> > >> > - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until the next vblank >> >...

On 01/16/2015 07:05 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote: >>> We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap >>> seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? >>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen at reaching-clients.com> wrote: > > Fascinating - describes what's happening but no mention of how we can rest > assured that all will be well.... > As I ponder it, I recognise that most of our systems are constantly > calculating date/time values based upon the epoch - the number of seconds > since a particular

...t; > Date: Wed Aug 12 17:00:31 2015 +0200 > > drm/irq: Make pipe unsigned and name consistent > > Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a > non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: > > - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight > breakage of the userspace ABI. > > - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not > pretty. > > - Fix this for real by delaying the pageflip TS until the next vblank > interrupt, thereby making it accurate. > > This patch im...

...unsigned and name consistent >>>>> >>>>> Trigering a warning when trying to sample the vblank timestamp for a >>>>> non-existing pipe. There's a few ways to fix this: >>>>> >>>>> - Open-code the old behaviour, which just enshrines this slight >>>>> breakage of the userspace ABI. >>>>> >>>>> - Revert Mario's commit and again inflict broken timestamps, again not >>>>> pretty. >>>>> >>>>> - Fix this for real by delaying the pagef...