search for: enshrined

...; I agree 100% with Peter. > Being a mathematician I agree with Bill that for us, a histogram is a > (very suboptimal) density estimate; but average statistics software users > *do* learn histograms differently.. I hope there are many of us that agree 100% with Bill. Bad practice, as enshrined in the default behaviour of histogram, should be discouraged. We should aim to introduce density-based histograms from the outset, and the default behaviour of histograms in many packages acts against this principle. The current default behaviour conveys a misleading and arguably useless summary,...

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> >

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote: >> We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap >> seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? > > Apparently Red Hat is well aware of the upcoming leap second:

Second test after big upgrade.. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... > > They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance on April 1 deserved fortune enshrinement. It reminded me of one

...lopers (especially newer developers) > "get the layering right" you really need to point to a place that says what > the layering *is*. Maybe you were agreeing to do that, but I'm not sure. > I wasn't planning on writing it down anymore than it's already necessarily enshrined in the build system. I'm not expecting to yell at/complain to people who violate it unknowingly (Apple/Windows developers in general don't get layering checked today because their linkers do resolve circular dependencies - but they get failures on Linux buildbots and fix them when they aris...

On 4/2/2016 11:07 AM, David Winsemius wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >>> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... >> They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? > Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:08:16PM +0100, poma wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > >> > period. Therefore that

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.

Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case. Unfortunately that hack got uprooted in commit

...r a just fit it into the existing hierarchy?". I don't think we will ever have a good and principled response. We will constantly have oddball warts where things happen to be top-level because at one point we wanted the ability to not check out those Subversion repos, and now that has been enshrined. I'm not actually arguing that #2 is a *good* layout. But I think it is a (slightly) less arbitrary layout than #1. And by breaking this weird mold of "all Subversion projects are top level", I think we'll be in a better place to make reasonably and considered decisions about re...

On 11/10/2015 05:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote: >> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> >> >> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank >> period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in >> >> commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Bill Kelly via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: >> On 13 October 2015 at 17:16, Kuperstein, Michael M via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> The FreeBSD CoC is, IMHO, much better in this respect ( https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html ).

On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> > Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 > > drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank >> > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in >> > >> > commit

...constantly calculating date/time values based upon the epoch - the number of seconds since a particular date/time, all these calculations need to be cognisant of these leap seconds, so its not just the ntp daemon, although that will be most immediately impacted, the effects of this need to be enshrined in code algorithms forever (well a very long time). > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

...; calculating date/time values based upon the epoch - the number of seconds > since a particular date/time, all these calculations need to be cognisant of > these leap seconds, so its not just the ntp daemon, although that will be > most immediately impacted, the effects of this need to be enshrined in code > algorithms forever (well a very long time). The overall time calculations weren't really the issue last time around. The problem was with sub-second sleeps and the thread scheduler being confused and spinning when ntp inserted an extra second in the clock. Any other way of resett...

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at

When we are at it, the one with the title "[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Use drm_vblank_on/off consistently" from Daniel, which has a reviewed and tested by me also never made it into nouveau. Maybe pick that up as well? -mario On 12/01/2015 04:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:08:16PM +0100, poma wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter