search for: emailadresse

I think, i had the same problem as you. When dovecot runs lmtp, no user is logged in, so there is no user from which you can get groups. So i think, my solution is (not really sure, if this is right, it's a long time ago, i played around) this transport in exim for local delivery dovecot_delivery:????????????? ? debug_print = "T: dovecot_delivery_pipe for $local_part@$domain translates

> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > > I think, i had the same problem as you. > > > > When dovecot runs lmtp, no user is logged in, so there is no user from > > which you can get groups. So i think, my

Hello list, I have problems displaying certain UNIX-files in samba. For example if I have a file named like this: ABNAHMELEHRE??????,PP272140019???,*,??,?,Z,?000,IBK,Y414019253751.model or BAUTEIL ,A21133321?2202,*, , ,Z, 000,IBK,F633302719552.model samba shows dos-like names as follow: Abnah~2s.mod and Baute~1m.mod Is there any way in telling samba to display

...hank you for your interest in SuSE Linux! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sehr geehrter SuSE Linux-Benutzer, vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht betreffs "Unknown Exception (feedback@suse.de)". Bitte beachten Sie, dass die von Ihnen verwendete Emailadresse (feedback@suse.de) nicht mehr verwendet wird. Natürlich können Sie uns auch weiterhin Ihre Anregungen, Fehlermeldungen oder Verbesserungsvorschläge zusenden. Wir haben für Sie ein Webformular eingerichtet unter http://www.suse.de/feedback Falls Sie Unterstützung benötigen, wenden Sie sich bitte...

Hi everybody, since some time I am looking for a current and reliable solution to send and receive faxes (probably fax-2-mail and mail-2-fax) in conjunction with Asterisk. For testing I am using a HFC-ISDN passive PCI-card, in production a Digium Dual T1/E1 PCI-card will be used. I run CentOS 5.5 (Kernel 2.6.18) and Asterisk 1.4 (but I also can use 1.8) but did not find any solution where I

> On 28/08/2019 21:07 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > > > >> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via

On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: > >> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >>> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:

On 29.8.2019 12.30, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: > >> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 28/08/2019 21:01

> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > I think, i had the same problem as you. > > When dovecot runs lmtp, no user is logged in, so there is no user from > which you can get groups. So i think, my solution is (not really sure, > if this is right, it's a long time ago, i played around) this transport > in exim

> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > >> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >>> >>> I think, i had the same problem as you. >>>

> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:30 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > >> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: >>> >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:

> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > >> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> >>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >>> >>> I think, i had the same problem as you. >>>

Hi, We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into *@newdomain, I have configured: > cat /etc/postfix/canonical > @olddomain.com @newdomain.com While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot occasionally creates mailboxes for non-existent users, like: >

> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: >> >>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >>> >>> >>>> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>>>

Ok I made Jarque-Bera test to the residuals (merv.reg$residual) library(tseries) jarque.bera.test(merv.reg$residual) X-squared = 1772.369, df = 2, p-value = < 2.2e-16 And I reject the null hypotesis (H0: merv.reg$residual are normally distributed) So I know that: 1 - merv.reg$residual aren't independently distributed (Box-Ljung test) 2 - merv.reg$residual aren't indentically

I've been wondering about ways to handle all the various different Sent/Sent Messages/Sent Items/etc mailboxes that different clients create and if there could be a way to make them work at least somewhat better. I'm mainly thinking about ISP-like installations where users are using tons of different clients and there's no way to get everyone configured properly. Of course the eventual

Another "me too" (also Gmail). I just received my 4th "account suspended, too many bounces" email, after having several days of lost mailing list content over a short vacation break the last time. When I notified the admin email account of the failure, it seemed the responder missed the point about the emails, saying the link had expired (it had been more than three days

...e is no one below INBOX. With this solution, > K9Mail shows the same Archive as Thunderbird shows ist as Special folder. > > > The Gmail-App handles different Namespaces at the same time, but > cannot handle different Identities. > K9Mail can handle different Identities (for Alias-Emailadresses) for > the same Account, but only one Namespace... > > Jakob > ? > *Gesendet:*?Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2018 um 07:54 Uhr > *Von:*?"Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> > *An:*?"Jakobus Sch?rz" <jakobus.schuerz at ebcont.com>, dovecot at dovecot.org...

Hi! Was looking at your config and I am puzzled why you are adding ? mailbox INBOX/Archives { ??? auto = no ??? special_use = \Archive ? } under namespace 'Synoptic'? Do you actually have a virtual folder config for all those folders? You can't just "move" folders into a namespace by declaring them there, those become Synoptic/INBOX/Archives, and require a dovecot-virtual