Displaying 20 results from an estimated 208 matches for "em1".
Did you mean:
em
2013 Apr 19
1
Can't connect to DSL modem on em1
Shorewall 4.5.15
3 Interface setup
em1
p3p1
p4p4
ppp0
Hi,
Since changing to NetworkManger on Fedora 18 I can no longer connect to the
DSL Modem, which is connected to Interface em1.
When the NetworkManger brings up the interfaces and ppp0, it no longer
assigns an IP to em1.
If I have ppp0 disabled and NetworkManger brings up the i...
2021 Dec 08
3
Qemu - enabling "bridge mode" for primary physical interface for VMs
...h have a
> "direct" fixed IP address and access the addresses \via the host network
> adapter, while the host retains its fixed IP.
If you are running NetworkManager (the default), it's not too hard.
Here's an example step-by-step for changing an existing interface "em1" to
be a bridge "br0":
# Create a bridge interface
nmcli con add type bridge ifname br0 bridge.stp no
# Copy all the IPv4/IPv6 config from an existing interface
nmcli con mod bridge-br0 $(nmcli -f ipv4.method,ipv4.addresses,ipv4.gateway,ipv6.method,ipv6.addresses,ipv6.gateway con...
2012 Jul 09
1
OpenVswitch with KVM virtual machines
Hey,
I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows:
____ ____
/ VM1\______br0_______/ em1\
\____/ | \____/
|
_|_
/VM2\
\____/
virbr0 is the virtual network switch
VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively.
em1 is the default network interface.
$sudo ovs-vsctl add-br br0
$sudo ovs-vsctl add-port br0 em1
$sudo ifconfig br...
2014 Aug 07
2
Centos 6.5 em1 network can not up????
We just got DELL R920 and installed Centos 6.5 on it.? After installation, network not function.? We manually enter IP address, gateway and netmark on "em1".?
we also do following:
1. startup NetworkManager
2. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1? ==> NM_CONTROOLED=yes
I tried to startup network and get error message:
Bring up interface em1: connection activation failed
Device not managed by NetworkManager or unavailable.
Any ideal?...
2016 Sep 02
0
Centos v6.8 and double received bytes
I'm observing double the amount of "recv" bytes in latest Centos v6.8 with
ixgbe 4.2.1-k.
Anybody seeing the same?
$ ethtool -i em1
driver: ixgbe
version: 4.2.1-k
$ uname -an
Linux chndcdmid01.rd.ph.cox.net 2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 23
19:58:13 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Doing comparison on 2 days at same hour just to show the difference. This
is an HTTP cache server, having higher RX than TX means...
2012 Jul 12
1
[ovs-discuss] OpenVswitch with KVM virtual machines
I am running NOX controller with a python script that prints out the
destination mac and the source mac for each packet arriving at the now
controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening:
With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the
controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to
the OVS, when I have the following setup:
____ ____
/ VM1\______br0_______/ VM3\
\____/ | \____/
|
_|_...
2013 Jun 04
3
Centos6.4 routing problem
dear All,
I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but
I think this problem is Centos-specific.
The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated.
I have one nic facing the public internet:
vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1
DEVICE=em1
BOOTPROTO=none
HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
UUID="cdfe1d58-c56c-47fc-8a93-5df2e168d176"
IPV6INIT=no
USERCTL=no
DNS2=195.238.2.22
DNS1=192.168.66.1
IPADDR=192.168.66.5
NETMASK=255.255.255.128
GATEWAY=192.168.66.1
and one nic serving the la...
2017 Feb 13
8
CentOS 7, systemd, NetworkMangler, oh, my
My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there,
and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I
try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no*
change.
Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's wonderful.
My manager thinks that the NM daemon thinks everything's fine, and
there've been
2014 Nov 01
3
Samba and NT (yes really) server
...password -d3
lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters
Initialising global parameters
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf"
Processing section "[global]"
added interface em1 ip=fe80::92b1:1cff:fe40:dca9%em1
bcast=fe80::ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff%em1 netmask=ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
added interface em1 ip=192.168.4.136 bcast=192.168.4.255
netmask=255.255.255.0
Client started (version 3.6.23-12.el6).
Connecting to 192.168.4.28 at port 445
Doing spnego session setup (blob lengt...
2021 Dec 08
2
Qemu - enabling "bridge mode" for primary physical interface for VMs
I have a physical host with a single physical network adapter. I want to host
several VMs on host. (guest1 - guest4) The guest systems are accessible via
192.168.122.* as is the default with qemu/virsh.
There are 4 IP addresses being routed to the primary interface on host. I can
set up an alias for the NIC and "see" these ip addresses.
I understand that it's possible to allow
2016 Aug 16
3
local routing puzzle
hi everyone
I'm having a bit of a puzzle on one centos system, I have
four interfaces:
nm-team1 10.5.6.100
em1 192.168.2.17
em2 192.168.2.18
p3p3 172.25.12.222
I do:
ping 10.5.6.17 -I em1
PING 10.5.6.17 (10.5.6.17) from 192.168.2.17 em1: 56(84)
bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.5.6.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.367 ms
the same for -I em2, for -I em1 and naturally for -I
nm-team1 - all good.
but:
$ ping 10....
2018 Oct 04
3
Need help with Linux networking interfaces and NIC bonding
...nge issues when configuring networking
interfaces on my physical server running Centos 7.5. Let me give you an
overview of what's going on:
We have a physical server, running CentOS 7.5. This server has one 4 port
NIC and one 2 port NIC and a Dell IDRAC port. The first port of the 4 port
NIC, em1, is used for Management traffic. The first port of the 2 port NIC,
is used for the second port in the NIC bond, device p6p2. The second
port on the 4 port NIC, device em2 is the first, port on the NIC bond.
These interfaces are using Static IPs.
Here is my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-e...
2017 Mar 06
1
[PATCH] v2v, p2v: rename rhvm network to ovirtmgmt (RHBZ#1429491)
...p2v/virt-p2v.pod
index ea685be..4a5f587 100644
--- a/p2v/virt-p2v.pod
+++ b/p2v/virt-p2v.pod
@@ -393,14 +393,14 @@ interfaces to the target C<default> network.
You give a comma-separated list of C<interface:target> pairs, plus
optionally a default target. For example:
- p2v.network=em1:rhvm
+ p2v.network=em1:ovirtmgmt
-maps interface C<em1> to target network C<rhvm>.
+maps interface C<em1> to target network C<ovirtmgmt>.
- p2v.network=em1:rhvm,em2:management,other
+ p2v.network=em1:ovirtmgmt,em2:management,other
-maps interface C<em1> to C<r...
2015 Jun 25
1
Possible bug in kickstart
Hello All,
I seem to have run into a bug with the new --bridgeslaves=<INTERFACE> option. It would seem that if I tell the bridge device to use a virtual interface (like bond0) rather than a physical interface (em1/em2) that kickstart completely barfs on it. I have provided my network section below which works fine as long as i don't enable all the bridge content.
When the installation starts off the creation of bond0 and all VLANs on bond0 go without issue. Jumping into TTY2 I can type 'ip a'...
2019 Feb 18
2
Network switch to IPV6 after PXE boot
...blem, kernel and
initrd are from a Centos 7.4 iso)
- PXE boot start and the desktop load the kernel and the inirtd file
- the kernel is booted and at this time the led of the network switch
goes down for the port used by the desktop.
- then I have a message "no carrier detected on interface em1"
- followed by " IPv6 ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGED): em1: link become ready
(and of course the led goes back to green on the switch)
But I have no IPV6 network setup!
How can I force to IPV4 setup to load the kikstart file ?
I've tried do switch from legacy boot to UEFI boot (my local...
2013 Nov 12
2
Problem with bridged network configuration
...at I did *not* have any bridge (for NAT use) configured
initially by default on my system, and followed the directions on this
page to create it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_started_with_virtualization
I have disabled the NetworkManager service, and created network
initscripts for my em1 and br0 interfaces.
I notice from the systemctl status output, that the network failure is
logged, and only *after* that the br0 interface comes up. So I wonder if
there is some ordering problem in spite of the fact that I have
specified DELAY=0 for br0.
I have included output from the followi...
2010 Sep 06
2
MSIX failure
...nd all seems well except my network card is unusable. On boot up:
em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.0.5> port 0x3040-0x305f mem 0xe3200000-0xe321ffff,0xe3220000-0xe3220fff irq 10 at device 25.0 on pci0
em0: Setup MSIX failure
em0: [FILTER]
em0: Ethernet address: 00:27:0e:1e:5e:e3
em1: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Legacy Network Connection 1.0.1> port 0x1000-0x103f mem 0xe3120000-0xe313ffff,0xe3100000-0xe311ffff irq 9 at device 1.0 on pci5
em1: [FILTER]
em1: Ethernet address: 00:1b:21:5b:f2:18
em0 is a PCI 'Intel(R) PRO/1000 GT Desktop Adapter' which worked up until now.
e...
2012 Nov 29
0
Trouble enabling PCI passthrough in xen HVM
...s installed as a module in this kernel. I unbound all
the NIC''s from dom0 driver and bound them to PCI back.
I then modified the domU config file to include the pci device. When the
system started booting up, I NICs were recognized however they failed to
attach. This is the message I got,
em1: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.0.0> port 0xc140-0xc15f mem
0xf3020 000-0xf303ffff,0xf3040000-0xf305ffff irq 37 at
device 5.0 on pci0
em1: Reserved 0x20000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xf3020000
em1: Setup MSIX failure
ioapic0: routing intpin 37 (PCI IRQ 37) to...
2014 Mar 20
3
biosdevname
Hello,
Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names
from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3?
Darn!
I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!!
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
2005 Jun 13
3
problem with pf and asterisk
current setup
SIP phone 192.168.1.30 --> linksys wrt54g sveasoft -- INTERNET --
(xl0) Firewall (xl2:172.16.0.50)--> (em1:172.16.0.101) Asterisk
problem is RTP stream not oging trouhg from * to sip and vice versa.
#1 and asterusk is pushing 192.168.1.30 back to linksys with 172 as
return address....
or
#2 asterisk trying to get back to me as 192.168 on public internet..
got
canreinvite=yes and no.
nat=yes
qual...