Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "elrier".
Did you mean:
earier
2004 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
...tml and later RFCs for
TCP/IP.
> No, we don't. Distributed computing would be built on top of LLVM (in my
> opinion). But, we _do_ need support for parallel or multi-processing
> computation as you described above (again, on a single physical
> computer).
wait, let's fix your elrier statement. As far as I understood
you do agree that case of multiple CPUs on a _single_ host
should be supported at LLVM layer. Right?
as I see from here:
> okay .. again, this isn't "distributed", just "parallel", and I agree
> its needed.
you call this case just...
2004 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
Interesting email address there :)
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 01:18, =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Valery
A.Khamenya=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= wrote:
> For the very beginning think of a host with multiple CPUs.
> I could formulate my proposal even for this non-networked
> case.
On the same machine, LLVM definitely needs to support both symmetric and
asymmetric multi-processing. I believe some primitives to
2004 Jan 08
4
[LLVMdev] Re: idea 10
> My $0.02 worth on this topic ..
and again |0.02 of mein :-)
> However, I find it unreasonable to expect LLVM to provide
> any features in this area. In order to do anything meaningful,
> LLVM would have to have some kind of awareness of networks
> (typically an operating system concern).
> That seems at odds with the "low level" principles of LLVM.
When I