search for: elliminating

Here is my formal proposal i have submitted in gsoc. Comments invited. About me: I am a final semester Dual Degree( B.Tech. M.Tech.) student from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. I was looking forward to participate in this year's GSoC 2009.Starting Fall 2009 i shall be pursuing a Phd in compilers. I am having a good background in compilers. My current masters thesis is aimed at

On Apr 3, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Kshitiz Garg wrote: > Here is my formal proposal i have submitted in gsoc. Comments invited. > This sounds like a very interesting proposal. Many compilers clone loops and use dynamic checks to enforce invariants in one copy of the loop. Is this intended to be similar to that style of approach? -Chris > > About me: > > I am a final

Hello, Kshitiz > I was interested in taking up the project ideas on adding profile driven > optimization passes and improving alias analysis as this would give me a > chance to carry forward and improve my current work and also contribute > significantly in terms of tangibles. This sounds like a great idea. LLVM definitely lacks some profile-driven optimizations. -- With best

Hello, I am a final semester Dual Degree( B.Tech. M.Tech.) student from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. I was looking forward to participate in this year's GSoC 2009.Starting Fall 2009 i shall be pursuing a Phd in compilers. I am having a good background in compilers. My current masters thesis is aimed at automatic parallel code from c programs target for the Cell Processor using

...hich did not react at all to "setup.exe". The other distros opened Lotus 123 but died on me after about 10 seconds. Except Fedora Core 4, which died after trying to open more than about two files. Thought this might be a memory problem, so I tried to reduce the demands on the system by elliminating a lot of options in user setup, smart icons setup and view preferences. After having done this I found that I got a fully working Lotus 123 on my Fedora distro!! My other distros did not let me change the settings before dying. So I copied over the lotus directory and the wine registry files (I...

...d is optimal and exactly what one expects. I show this result in "Output B" where you get a beatiful sequence of addsd into register xmm2. It's all very strange and it points to some questionable decision making on the part of llvm. I tried different versions of the sum() function (elliminating the loop for example) but it does not help. Another observation is that the loop variable i (in foo) must be involved: if one does *p = 5 (instead of p[i] = 5), the problem also goes away. I would appreciate some advice on how to get around this problem. Thank you for any help, Brent double sum...

Dear Pals I think all of us in this business (or most) looking at the Corn Flakes Back Side , Wish to find a NAT Friendly VOIP solution. Thats ridiculous I know, but what about this wish list (Personal Point of view) Upnp support for Asterisk STUN Support for Asterisk Small Embedded Asterisk (just to redirect IAX) SIP-IAX , h.323-IAX or something like that , on the End Point. As a Nat

...d is optimal and exactly what one expects. I show this result in "Output B" where you get a beatiful sequence of addsd into register xmm2. It's all very strange and it points to some questionable decision making on the part of llvm. I tried different versions of the sum() function (elliminating the loop for example) but it does not help. Another observation is that the loop variable i (in foo) must be involved: if one does *p = 5 (instead of p[i] = 5), the problem also goes away. I would appreciate some advice on how to get around this problem. Thank you for any help, Brent double sum...

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface