search for: elibrari

I got the following error when trying to create the elibrary instance (rdb:21) @elibrary = Elibrary.new(params[:elibrary]) RuntimeError Exception: Declare either attr_protected or attr_accessible for Elibrary, but not both. params : "elibrary"=>{"title"=>"bingo three", "short_description"=>"something new",

I would to use this software to manage my books, but it doesn't start. I've installed net 2.0. In wine database the last information are too old so I would to know if someone have resolved or want to resolve the problem

pls could you include my name in the samba Digest mailing list, thanks Mark.

> On Apr 22, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > I feel like this thread got a bit stalled. I'd like to pick it up and try to suggest a path forward. > > I don't hear any real objections to the overall idea of having an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtimes and support libraries. I think we should get that created. I think it

Chandler, It seems that the general consensus is to save further discussions for later and go ahead with your proposal. I can add my +1 to this as well. Could you / Jason prepare a proposal on the new project, with all the usual questions covered? One interesting thing is where to put SE and libomptarget in the project's tree. I would be happy to review it from Intel / OpenMP side. Also, as

Ahh, I just noticed that Chandler's proposal is to put SE only into this new project, and to keep libomptarget separately, in OpenMP project. I wonder why so? Why SE (a library serving only one PPM so far) is different from libomptarget (a library also serving only one PPM so far)? Are people have opinion on this? Yours, Andrey ===== Software Engineer Intel Compiler Team On Tue, Apr 26,

Chandler, Thank you for getting it up to ML top. I believe we have to move broader than that you just mentioned. The natural separation of the infrastructure into different parts can be across the following lines: - the parallel model of programming - these can be OpenMP, OpenACC, CilkPlus, OpenCL, StreamExecutor, CUDA, C++ parallel extensions, etc. - the offloading machinery to be used by any

Please note that Windows 9x clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this article. Therefore the protocol for support Windows 9x style domain logons is completely different from NT4 domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. Did you read this document? Let me know what needs to be updated and i will take care of it. Cheers, jerry