search for: egoistically

https://source.android.com/source/using-repo It plays well with large projects (heck, it was designed for Android), and it works really well. I'm guessing you guys have already considered it and rejecting it for some really smart reason, but I wanted to make sure! ;) -- Ryan (ライアン) Yoko Shimomura > ryo (supercell/EGOIST) > Hiroyuki Sawano >> everyone else http://refi64.com/

Hi Devs, do you have an estimate for a new release date? We want to deploy linux boxes which will include support for the newly contributed phoenixcontact_modbus driver. As we would like to create a package for both CentOS and an embedded Linux device we have, we would prefer if the package was based on a official release. If 2.7.5 is not coming soon (say 1 week) do you have a suggestion of a

I would like to suggest a slight modification to diag(). In the case where x is a matrix with both row names and column names the same, it would be reasonable if the resulting vector also had those names. I often use diag() on variance matrices, where this modification is helpful. The modification requires replacing if (is.matrix(x) && nargs() == 1) return(c(x)[1 +

Hi Everyone, Can I suggest a couple of new `codes' methods. I know codes is a bit dodgy (at least, according to the comments in codes.factor), but for what it's worth I like to extract codes from data frames of factors, for which the following two functions (which operate recursively) are helpful: "codes.default" <- function(x) { if (is.list(x)) lapply(x, codes)

I am interested in being able to use R in my own libraries, written in C++. I have seen that in the past several people have asked about this possibility. In the book Programming in S it is stated that it is possible to call R functions from a C++ called from R. Also, it seems it is possible to do something with the R D-COM port, but at least for somebody with my limited capabilities (and time)

Hi, I have a setup with apache 2.2.6 proxying requests to a cluster of 5 mongrels. Occassionally, I receive the following error in the logs: [Tue Oct 30 12:00:28 2007] [error] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.1:8013 (127.0.0.1) from 213.205.247.171 () [Tue Oct 30 12:00:28 2007] [error] [client 213.205.247.171] Handler for proxy-server returned

Hi Chris, Thanks for the supporting words! I'm pushing the document both for egoistic motives (like so many others, I'll learn a ton from this document) and for altruistic motives - the easier it is to implement a new language, the more interesting and highly well-thought out languages we will see in the future. And I see it as my purpose, as a mostly black-box user of LLVM, to enhance

...e aspects our project does use daily (as is, or extended) - such as the core stuff, the nut-scanner, and networked snmp and netxml drivers, and systemd integration for the most part. We also happen to do much of the recent years' innovation in these areas and backport it to upstream... in part, egoistically - so we have even more testing and less codebase deviations to track :-) I suggest your project does the same, because you can't really know how well drivers and other bits behave on different hardware until you expose them to different use-cases. But if the bits you want are in upstream/maste...

I hope this is the right forum (it'll be second time lucky if it is!). I note in the current distribution that functions passed as arguments (eg to outer, sweep and the applys) are not handled consistently. As I often pass functions myself, I find the following simple function useful ... match.fun <- function (FUN, descend = F) { if (is.character(FUN)) get(FUN,

Am I right in thinking that there a discrepancy between the ?library documentation and the library() function? If I have a library called "patches", then according to the documentation (0.62.4) patches/R should contain source files like fred.R and george.R, but in practice the library only loads if both fred.R and george.R are given in a file called patches in the R subdirectory of

This is a minor question, but is there any difference between the two objects fred <- structure(1:10, dim = c(2,5)) and fred <- structure(1:10, .Dim = c(2,5)) Should I be using one rather than the other? Thanks, Jonathan. Jonathan Rougier Science Laboratories Department of Mathematical Sciences South Road University of Durham Durham DH1 3LE

Hello, Based on the GSS userauth code that went into 3.7p1, I have made a patch to make OpenSSH support an alternative Kerberos 5 implementation called Shishi, via an alternative GSS-API implementation called GSSLib. The reason behind this message is mostly to let you know that another pair of eyes has been reading GSS userauth code in OpenSSH, and my impression is that it looks pretty good. I

Is anyone else concerned with the way in which the R function parser relocates comments that occur after condional expressions in functions to before, i.e. fred <- function(x) { # wonder what x is like if (x>0) stop("Sorry non-positive x only") # that showed x big-time! x } but then fred is parsed and stored as "fred" <- function (x) { # wonder what x is

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-1804928587-922106403=:691 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII A couple of weeks ago I asked if anyone had generalised outer to include bound extents -- effectively

I'm not sure exactly where to point my finger with this one, but there is a nasty surprise to the unsuspecting user. There is no check on the length of the vector passed in the pch= argument to plot, it is just recycled as necessary: plot(1:10,1:10,pch=1:2) gives alternating circles and triangles. The nasty bits come up especially with plot.formula: x<-1:10;y<-1:10

Would it be reasonable to suggest adding an `all' flag to save.image(), i.e. "save.image" <- function (f = ".RData", all.names = F) eval(substitute(save(list = ls(all.names = all.names), file = f)), .GlobalEnv) I only ask because I keep losing my .First() function. I would like to start R in a particular directory and have it configure according to the First()

I am not sure that this is a bug, but it was unexpected -- of course my expectations are fallible, eg column ordering in model.matrix()! When an array is subscripted the names of the dimnames list are lost (v 64.1). fred <- array(1:12, 2:4, list(A = letters[1:2], B = letters[3:5], C = letters[6:9])) dimnames(fred) dimnames(fred[1, , ]) dimnames(fred[1, , , drop=FALSE]) In the first

I can generate a segmentation fault as follows, where I would expect a syntax error: fred <- as.list(1:10) lapply(fred, "[[") platform sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 arch sparc os solaris2.5.1 system sparc, solaris2.5.1 status status.rev 0 major 0 minor 64.1

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-1251336619-945861747=:5357 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII While fiddling with apply I noticed that there appears to be an error in the dimnames, which actually

I've just started digging into Andreas's old report: > a <- array(0,c(2,2,2)); > dimnames(a)<-list(hansi=1:2, pepi=c("a","b"), karli=3:4) > dimnames(a[,,1]) # losing component names [[1]] [1] "1" "2" [[2]] [1] "a" "b" Now, this would be fairly easily fixed (I think) which would also make it compatible with S3.