search for: eepro1000

...1st vif of router 6 are connected via a third bridge) The idea is to get the 802.1Q port on the Router6 host (via the bridge), and then use virtual interfaces (eth1.xxx where xxx are the vlan ID) inside the XenU. Well, it works, only if I use mtu 1496 for the vifs. I know the physical interfaces (eepro1000) can cope with vlan natively. Don''t know for the bridge code but i''m not aware of limitations there. So it is a limitation on vif code ?? -- Yann Dupont, Cri de l''université de Nantes Tel: 02.51.12.53.91 - Fax: 02.51.12.58.60 - Yann.Dupont@univ-nantes.fr ____________...

I have a bridge that has gigabit interfaces. The machine in question has the fun job of being a Bridge, Firewall and SMB server. Both of the Gigabit interfaces are connected to workstations directly via Xover cable (well MDI-X to be exact). My question is, if I enable jumbo frames on the gigabit interfaces will that make any difference in overall transfer rate of the bridge? I was thinking it

Hi, I am trying to optimize my gigabit network. I have two Intel 1000 MT Gigabit Server Adapters, which support Jumbo Frames -- as well as a Switch that supports Jumbo Frames. However, I am observing some strange behavior in my file transfers from Windows XP to Linux and I am wondering if it has anything to do with the way the Samba variables are set on my Linux box? The "strange