search for: eakin

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "eakin".

Did you mean: akin
2000 May 24
0
'command' option in authorized_keys
...nv, &envsize, "TERM", term); if (display) child_set_env(&env, &envsize, "DISPLAY", display); + if (original_command) /* LEE */ + child_set_env(&env, &envsize, "SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND", original_command); /* LEE */ #ifdef _AIX { -- Lee Eakin - leakin at ti.com - Naming Services, Texas Instruments -o) [ permanent e-mail: Lee at Eakin.Org ] /\\ _\_v echo "forgot::0:0::/:/bin/sh" >> /etc/passwd; echo "If you forgot y...
2000 Dec 15
1
Preserving argument splitting with SSH
I'm using: % ssh -V SSH Version OpenSSH-1.2.3, protocol version 1.5. Compiled with SSL. % uname -a Linux gellar 2.2.13 #1 SMP Wed Dec 29 14:07:41 PST 1999 i686 unknown and am wondering whether it's a fundamental shortcoming of the SSH protocol that argument splitting is not preserved from client to server, but instead the argument list is re-split on whitespace. E.g., from my machine
2003 May 09
2
TCP_NODELAY always set, now?
I know that there was a discussion on this about a year back, and there is a bug 556 this week that mentions TCP_NODELAY. However, when I use ssh through a pipe (e.g., to tunnel through an HTTP proxy using CONNECT) I see: getsockopt TCP_NODELAY: Socket operation on non-socket How do I tell which end is generating this (I'm assuming the local side, which is running through the pipe). Also,
2000 Jun 14
4
need help with compiling openssh
hi, I'm trying to compile OpenSSH, latest version on my Linux box. I know that it requires openssl and I've installed the 0.9.5a and it's working just fine. Now when I'm trying to ./configure the openssh with the options ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/bin/openssh/ --without-pam --without-shadow --with-tcp-wrappers It's giving me checking for openssl directory... configure:
2001 Aug 16
1
port-forwarding problem!?
Using OpenSSH_2.9p2 on Linux and Sparc Solaris. Trying to connect from Linux to Solaris, with remote port-forwarding i.e. On Linux, ssh -R 3000:Linux:23 Solaris The connection is established okay, but the port-forwarding does not work; on Solaris, the connection to localhost port 3000 is accepted, but it appears as if no data makes it back to port 23 on Linux. If an older 1.2.30 sshd is used
2001 Sep 26
1
Protocol 2 remote port forwarding
Hi all, I'm using openssh-2.9p2 on Solaris 2.8. I can get remote port forwarding to work using the -R flag, but only with ssh protocol 1 not ssh protocol 2. I've read that remote forwarding protocol 2 was not supported in earlier versions of openssh, but I'm wondering if this is still the case. Jarno Huuskonen [Jarno.Huuskonen at uku.fi], posted a patch in 2000 to add support for
2003 Apr 01
0
minor cosmetic fix when using a proxy
...e message by skipping the call to error only if errno == ENOTSOCK. There is probably a better way to handle this, maybe not calling set_nodelay when a proxy is in use? I just figured reporting it was better than keeping silent. Apply, mangle, or ignore as you see fit. See attached. -- Lee Eakin - leakin at dfw.nostrum.com I think our coffee machine is networked -- I keep seeing these dropped sugar packets all around it. -------------- next part -------------- diff -u misc.c.ORIG misc.c --- misc.c.ORIG Sun Dec 22 20:44:36 2002 +++ misc.c Mon Mar 31 15:40:18 2003 @@ -97,7 +97,9 @@ opt...
2002 Mar 14
1
rsync 2.5.4 -v output (minor knit)
I noticed a difference in verbose output that appears to be unintentional. it first prints 'receiving file list ...', then builds the list and prints 'done\n'. I haven't figured out the exact conditions yet, but with multiple remote sources (remote shell expands) it sometimes prints the 'done\n' message multiple times. I have a script I use to sync up my dot-files
2003 May 16
0
Dry run missing files
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:40:21PM -0500, Lee Eakin wrote: > > Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:11:09 -0700 > > From: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws> > > Subject: [RFC] report options > > > > I have hinted in the past of wanting to go to a more > > selective control of the output of rsync. Here it is. > > >...
2002 Mar 20
2
transferring individual files question, pull vs. push
Can't seem to find the answer anywhere... I'm currently using an rsync script on the source box to transfer some individual files to the destination box...all works well. The script: rsync -e ssh \ /var/qmail/control/file1 \ /var/qmail/control/file2 \ /var/qmail/control/file3 \ /var/qmail/control/file4 \ destination-box.xxxxx.com:/var/qmail/control Now, instead of "pushing"
2003 May 16
4
[RFC] report options
I have hinted in the past of wanting to go to a more selective control of the output of rsync. Here it is. PROBLEMS with the existing --verbose et al. The simple incrementing verbose doesn't allow one to restrict stdout to what actually is of interest. For instance inside dirvish i don't care about directories, or any kind of non-regular file because they show up every time even if