search for: eahc

Dear, I wanna to compare AUC generated by two distribution models using the same sample. The AUC for model 1 consists of two columns, column A for 0/1 and column B for probability, eahc with the same row number of 3000. The AUC for model 2 consists of two columns, column A for 0/1 and column B for probability, eahc with the same row number of 10000 rows. I am wondering what value I should put in for x1, x2, and y in this function. Please kindly help and thank you. Elaine [[al...

Dear, I wanna to compare AUC generated by two distribution models using the same sample. The AUC for model 1 consists of two columns, column A for 0/1 and column B for probability, eahc with the same row number of 3000. The AUC for model 2 consists of two columns, column A for 0/1 and column B for probability, eahc with the same row number of 10000 rows. I am wondering what value I should put in for gold and test in this function. Please kindly help and thank you. Elaine [[al...

...en you reset the iterator back to the start was caused by your own algorithm repeatedly inserting/restarting over and over again, and not by weirdness surrounding insertion iterator invalidation semantics) [also note that the LLVM coding guidelines suggest storing end once & then using that in eahc loop iteration - you should do this, but you'll hit iterator invalidation on insertion for the end iterator too, so you'll have to re-initialize it after any insertion that might invalidate the end iterator] - David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed......

I am looping through all instructions in a Function and depending on what I found I may or may not insert code. Despite the fact that I'm only actually inserting *before* instruction I have a infinite loop when I do something like below. For awhile it was simple enough to just increment i enough times but now I need something better. for(inst_iterator i = inst_begin(F); i != inst_end(F); ++i)

...r back > to the start was caused by your own algorithm repeatedly > inserting/restarting over and over again, and not by weirdness surrounding > insertion iterator invalidation semantics) > [also note that the LLVM coding guidelines suggest storing end once & then > using that in eahc loop iteration - you should do this, but you'll hit > iterator invalidation on insertion for the end iterator too, so you'll have > to re-initialize it after any insertion that might invalidate the end > iterator] > - David >