search for: e_accessdeni

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "e_accessdeni".

Did you mean: e_accessdenied
2008 Jul 22
2
.NET 2.0 fails compiling assemblies on OSX
...-2002. All rights reserved. Installing assembly mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089 but later, when I do Code: wine ngen executequeueditems I got Code: Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070057 (E_INVALIDARG) This happens with win2k, with winxp you get E_Accessdenied everywhere I have checked the keys corresponding to the CLR service in the Registry as well as .net ones and everything seems ok. I would try with winxp if someone tells me how to pass over access_denied and so (I know sudo doesn't work) I need this for Autocad 2008 (.net 1.1 is fully worki...
2019 Apr 26
0
Wine release 4.7
...ntoskrnl.exe: Implement PsLookupThreadByThreadId. server: Allow creating process kernel objects. ntoskrnl.exe: Implement process object constructor. ntoskrnl.exe: Implement PsLookupProcessByProcessId. Detlef Riekenberg (3): taskschd/tests: Avoid a crash in a test after E_ACCESSDENIED. qcap/tests: Avoid a crash in a test. kernel32/pipe: Avoid a crash in a test. Dmitry Timoshkov (2): cryptui: Implement CryptUIDlgSelectCertificateFromStore. kernel32: Add MapUserPhysicalPages stub. Erich Hoover (5): server: Add default security descriptor ownership...
2004 Jul 31
3
Bug in new_work_item
Hi all, Windows 2000 Ruby 1.8.2 R7 VC++ 6.0 I noticed that if I try to call new_work_item and give the task a name that already exists, I get a segfault: C:\eclipse\workspace\win32-taskscheduler>ruby test.rb "0.1.0" test.rb:22:in `new_work_item'': NewWorkItem() function failed (Win32::TaskSchedul erError) from test.rb:22 test.rb:22: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby
1997 Aug 02
44
Question
Is there a way to prevent other users from being able to map a drive from windoww95/NT to anyother user directory on the system. For example I can map to anyone's account on the system and have read only access, is there a way to stop this in either the global or share level? Thanks