search for: e5620

Hi, referring to thread: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/177385#177385. I have the same thing going on: hypervisors with E5620 Xeon CPUs and hypervisors with E5410 CPUs. Live migrations go wrong when domU''s are not created on the latter and move from the E5410 servers to more recent ones. The rationale being that these CPU''s have less or other capabilities than the newer ones. Is there any way to wor...

...e "Using timer interrupt." when trying the command "opcontrol --list-events". then I found infomation "xenoprof: Initialization failed. Intel processor model 44 for P6 class family is not supported“ after "xm dmesg". the TYPE OF CPUS here is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz. So does it really not support this type of processor and is there any fix that may solve it ？ need help... . Thanks~ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, I''ve noticed that on a Xen cluster with three nodes (two E5620 CPUs and one E5140 CPU) live migration works perfectly in between to two E5620 nodes, but fails to and from the E5140. The error message is about a HVM context not being able to be set. I strongly suspect the use 238 GPPVL drivers, but I cannot uninstall them at this point because someone else...

Hi all, I want to know if PMU in Xen HVM or PV is supported now? I have done a test that in the latest xen-unstable source, "perf" command cannot give right output in VMs. My CPU is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz. Thanks, Arthur -- Arthur Chunqi Li Department of Computer Science School of EECS Peking University Beijing, China _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

I use xen 4.0(dom0 is suse11.sp1,2.6.32 x86_64) on Dell R710 with PERC H700 RAID adapter. --Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz --8 CPU cores. --Memory 64G --RAID5 4.5T When I dedicated (pin) a CPU core only for dom0 use. (I specify "dom0_max_vcpus=1 dom0_vcpus_pin" options for Xen) I got dom0 kernel panic error(pin-1-5.30.bmp) When I pin 2 core to dom0, the dom0 system can boot up, but it can''...

Hi, I am working with a westemere based server. I need to find out if the NIC installed there supports SR-IOV - what would be the best way to determine that? Regards, Kashyap hwconfig ------------- Summary: HP DL160 G6, 2 x Xeon E5620 2.40GHz, 15.7GB / 16GB 1333MHz, 1 x 500GB SATA System: HP ProLiant DL160 G6, C-2N/16/500, ySPEC 25.0 Processors: 2 x Xeon E5620 2.40GHz (HT enabled, 8 cores, 16 threads) - Gulftown B1, 64-bit, quad-core, 32nm, L3: 12MB Memory: 15.7GB / 16GB 1333MHz == 4 x 4GB - 4GB PC3-10600 Hyn...

...able and require a hard boot to resolve. All have Intel NICs. Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any specific action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs Kernel messages upon failure: pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Transaction Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) pcieport 0000:00:03.0: device [8086:340a] error status/mas...

I run VMware vSphere 4 Essentials with three almost identically configured ESXi 4.1 hosts and a mix of 32 and 64 bit guests including Windows 2003 and 2008 as well as CentOS 5 and 6. Recently I updated one of the hosts to build 800380. The new build runs Windows and CentOS 5 VMs fine, but CentOS 6 guests won't come up. I tried two different CentOS 6 VMs. Both have the latest standard kernel

Hi everyone, I'm trying to use samba in a small video post production house but we are not getting the performance we expected. Our setup: - CenOS 5.6 x86-64 - samba.x86_64 (3.0.33-3.29.el5_6.2 and 3.6.0rc1) - Intel based server (One 4 core Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 GB RAM) - 4 Intel Gigagit ethernet NIC ports with 802.3ad bonding connected to a switch configured tu use 802.3ad - 8 2TB 7.2 krpm SATA disks with hardware RAID5 (RAID stripe size 1024 bytes, controller and disk cache enabled, readahead enabled) - XFS filesystem (created with the fo...

I want to try to get VGA passthrough working in a Windows 7 x64 domU. I''m running debian squeeze/testing/unstable with Jeremy''s 2.6.32.x kernel. The best I got to work is the device showing up under Windows 7, with all resources and whatnot. I''ve applied the vga-loadbios patch and vBAR-pBAR patch to xen, and the vBAR-pBAR patch to qemu-dm. This behaviour

...btrfs and mount, I get the bug again. Freeze again on second mount > attempt after that. > > This happens on 2.6.36 and 2.6.37 with scst patches, 2.6.37 vanilla and on > 2.6.38-rc5 it just freezes the first time I try to mount. No outuput in dmesg. > > The hardware is Dual Xeon E5620, 12GB ram, Areca 1880 with 3 arrays (testing on > 3TB raid10 and 10TB raid6), SuperMicro X8DTU-F. > > If I left out any important info, please let me know ;). > A btrfs bug, I suspect. > [ 605.109630] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 &gt...

.../vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.el5xen ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet module /initrd-2.6.18-194.el5xen.img title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server-base (2.6.18-194.el5) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.el5 ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.18-194.el5.img CPU: Xeon E5620 Thank you~ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...as selected. We have started to use the card on the production and results have been good. In eight hours in a day it is handling around 50,000 calls, without any issues. There are no issues in voice quality. Allo PRI Card: 2aCP4e (2nd Gen) Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz OS Debian GNU/Linux 7.6 (wheezy) RAM: 16 GB 10AM 6 PM 50000 Per day Libpri: 1.4.12-2 Asterisk: 1.8.13.1~dfsg1-3+deb7u3 -- Regards, Tirveni Yadav What is this Universe ? From what it arises ? Into what does it go? In freedom it a...

...able and require a hard boot to resolve. All have Intel NICs. Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any specific action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs Kernel messages upon failure: pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Transaction Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) pcieport 0000:00:03.0: device [8086:340a] error status/mas...

...o resolve. All have Intel NICs. > > Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly > encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any > specific action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. > > - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs > > Kernel messages upon failure: > > pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 > pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, > type=Transaction Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) > pcieport 0000:00:03.0:...

...; - address comments by Jason Wang, use delayed cb everywhere > - rebased Jason's patch on top of mine and include it (with some tweaks) > > Please reivew. Comments were more than welcomed. > > [1] Performance Test result: > > Environment: > - Two Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz machines connected back to back > with 82599ES cards. > - Both host and guest were net-next.git plus the patch > - Coalescing parameters for the card: > Adaptive RX: off TX: off > rx-usecs: 1 > rx-frames: 0 > tx-usecs: 0 > tx-frames: 0 > - Vhost_net...

...; - address comments by Jason Wang, use delayed cb everywhere > - rebased Jason's patch on top of mine and include it (with some tweaks) > > Please reivew. Comments were more than welcomed. > > [1] Performance Test result: > > Environment: > - Two Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz machines connected back to back > with 82599ES cards. > - Both host and guest were net-next.git plus the patch > - Coalescing parameters for the card: > Adaptive RX: off TX: off > rx-usecs: 1 > rx-frames: 0 > tx-usecs: 0 > tx-frames: 0 > - Vhost_net...

...everywhere >> - rebased Jason's patch on top of mine and include it (with some >> tweaks) >> >> Please reivew. Comments were more than welcomed. >> >> [1] Performance Test result: >> >> Environment: >> - Two Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz machines connected back >> to back >> with 82599ES cards. >> - Both host and guest were net-next.git plus the patch >> - Coalescing parameters for the card: >> Adaptive RX: off TX: off >> rx-usecs: 1 >> rx-frames: 0 >> tx-...

...everywhere >> - rebased Jason's patch on top of mine and include it (with some >> tweaks) >> >> Please reivew. Comments were more than welcomed. >> >> [1] Performance Test result: >> >> Environment: >> - Two Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz machines connected back >> to back >> with 82599ES cards. >> - Both host and guest were net-next.git plus the patch >> - Coalescing parameters for the card: >> Adaptive RX: off TX: off >> rx-usecs: 1 >> rx-frames: 0 >> tx-...

Hello, I made an interesting observation related to the "Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -2999660320319 ns)" problem. In the log of ntpd I found: Oct 5 03:46:35 greenville-dom0 ntpd[4020]: kernel time sync status change 6001 Oct 5 04:03:41 greenville-dom0 ntpd[4020]: kernel time sync status change 2001 Oct 5 05:29:03 greenville-dom0 ntpd[4020]: kernel time sync status change