search for: e5405

Hi, we bought some machines with 2 x quad core Xeon E5405 processors and installed centos 5.3 on them. My problem is that I can't get the cpuspeed service to work. No driver seems to claim responsibility for the throttling and the fallback "modprobe acpi_cpufreq" in the cpuspeed init script just yields a "No such device" messag...

...om0's cpu usage as reported by xm top is 622%. It seems like Xen is just performing poorly while handling these Windows VMs. Any suggestions? I have Windows VM's on other hardware (typically PowerEdge R905s and R710s and they seem ok). This 2950 is a decent machine.. 32G RAM, 2x Xeon E5405 (quad core) at 2ghz. And I'm only allocating 1 CPU and 768MB RAM for each VM. Sample config: name = "win01n" maxmem = 768 memory = 768 vcpus = 1 builder = "hvm" kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader" boot = "c" pae = 1 acpi = 1 apic = 0 localtime = 1...

...is around 325Go. Every time my client start rsync, both rsyncd on the server and rsync on the client entered "Uninterruptible sleep" state and I can't figure out why. Server : - Linux san1 2.6.30-gentoo-r4 #3 SMP Thu Nov 19 14:17:42 CET 2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux - 8Gb ECC RAM - Rsync server : 3.0.9 - Rsyncd.conf : # /etc/rsyncd.conf pid file = /var/run/rsyncd.pid use chroot = no read only = yes transfer logging = no dont compress = * timeout = 60 [webroot] path = /home/http...

I found on some CPUs an ACPI based HVM chews up a lot of CPU time versuses an APIC HVM, so in Windows I would change the computer type in device manager to "Standard PC" and disable acpi in the domain config. -Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com <xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com

...wn for a while but is now between 70% and 95% sustained. We've only had this plugin going for less than a day so I don't really have any more data going back further. But we've suspected a disk issue for some time - just have not been able to prove it. Our system IBM 3650 - quad 2Ghz e5405 Xeon 8K SAS RAID Controller 6 x 300G 15K/RPM SAS Drives /dev/sda - 2 drives configured as a RAID 1 for 300G for the OS /dev/sdb - 3 drives configured as RAID5 for 600G for the DB 1 drive as a global hot spare /dev/sdb is the one that is maxing out. We need to have a very serious look at fixing th...

Hello, We did small test with sipp to test Asterisk Background command capability. Our goal was 700 sim. calls on HP Proliant DL160 G5 E5405 1 x Quad Core Xeon 2Ghz 2 Gb RAM Asterisk 1.4.18.1 Centos 5.2 We reached more then 1000 when our network (100mbps) become a bottleneck. As we achieved our goal - no further testing was performed. As conclusion - we are very happy with Asterisk in this case. If somebody is in...

...e already installed system use the "new" ahci controller? Previously, it appears to have been using the piix module to access the drive with the root fs on it. I'm using the 64-bit 2.6.18-92.1.18 centosplus kernel (for XFS support). The box is running an asus dsbf-de board, with 2x e5405 cpus and 16g of ram. There are six drives on the ahci, one 80g "system" drive (the boot drive), and five 750g storage drives. There is also a supermicro 8 port sata hba in the system, with five 250g drives on it. The supermicro uses the sata_mv module and is detected just fine. Thank...

Hi, I have a problem with a dom0 which is unable to launch my domU : all my dom0 are Debian Lenny amd64 with Debian kernel 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 and xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64. Then all domU (PV) are Debian Lenny amd64 too, with vanilla kernel 2.6.29.6. So, this new dom0 can''t launch any domU which are working on an other dom0. Software is same on both dom0, and hardware is near the

Hi. I installed solaris express developer edition (b79) on a supermicro quad-core harpertown E5405 with 8 GB ram and two internal sata-drives. I installed solaris onto one of the internal drives. I added an areca arc-1680 sas-controller and configured it in jbod-mode. I attached an external sas-cabinet with 16 sas-drives 1 TB (931 binary GB). I created a raidz2-pool with ten disks and one spare....

...ly when booting either Linux 3.2 without Xen, or when booting Linux 2.6.32 (linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 from Squeeze) on Xen. I tried with Xen 4.0 from Squeeze (xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64) the behavior is the same (it hangs with Linux 3.2). The systems are all running 2 quad-core Xeon (E5320 or E5405) with 32Gb to 64Gb of RAM, with Supermicro X7DB8 motherboards. Here is a LSPCI on one of them : 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 5000P Chipset Memory Controller Hub (rev b1) 00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 5000 Series Chipset PCI Express x8 Port 2-3 (rev b1) 00:04.0 PCI bridge: Intel C...

...ers,ou=accounts,dc=jensenmaritime,dc=com scope = onelevel auth_bind = yes pass_filter = (&(objectClass=CourierMailAccount)(!(disableimap=*))(mail=%Lu)) pass_attrs = auth_username_format=%Lu # uname -a Linux milne 2.6.28-hardened-r9 #4 SMP Mon Jun 7 10:50:28 PDT 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux (Using Gentoo 64-bit Linux)

...). The software versions seem to be ok for most machines: Lenovo A57 with S-ATA and (E8200, VT enabled): up to 90MB/s Shuttle, FB61 based, ATA-Disk (Celeron, no VT): up to 55MB/s HP ML350 G5, Smart-Array RAID-Controller (E5420, VT enabled): ~12MB/s IBM x3650, ServeRaid 8k RAID-Controller (E5405, VT enabled): ~140MB/s The figures are not real benchmarks - just a dd of a file which is big enough to get around cache effects in dom0. Unfortunately, the HP machines with the problem are in production use so that I cannot confirm, but I usually get normal performance out of HPs with SmartArray...

Hello listmates, We are working on setting up two private networks linked by a public network which is fast (1 Gbit/s) but potentially insecure. Since the hosts on our two networks need to talk to each other, and do so securely, we have decided to use OpenVPN to connect them, making one gateway a server and the other a client. The connectivity part was easy to establish and worked like a charm.

Hi all, This is my first post to the list, I hope someone out there can help! I am running xen 3.0.3, with CentOS 5.2 based Dom0 (kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) Recently I have noticed some complete system lockups on a few different servers. Neither Dom0 or any of the guests respond to pings, connecting a keyboard and monitor to the system only shows a blank screen. Nothing is written to logs

...:12:57 EEST 2008 root@7x86.noc.ntua.gr:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC-DEBUG WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. WARNING: DIAGNOSTIC option enabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (1997.03-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> Features2=0xce33d<SSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,V...