search for: e19205

Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Yes, C99 is on and according to B.2.18 from > http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19205-01/819-5265/bjapp/index.html > also casual use. What does not work is the inclusion of a static function > from extern inline. It also does work if I declare bitwriter_grow_ also > as "inline". I actually think SUN/Oracle Studio is doing the wrong thing here as GCC, Clang and MS...

Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > There compilation on Solaris 10 Sparc with Sun Studio 12 gives the following compile errors: > > > CC bitreader.lo > > "bitreader.c", line 494: warning: implicit function declaration: MIN > > CC bitwriter.lo > > "bitwriter.c", line 273: reference to static identifier "bitwriter_grow_" in extern

...an you please make sure that your C compiler is in the C99 mode and > you have optimisation turned on and try again. > > From my reading the ISO C99 spec, this code should compile with a C99 > compliant compiler. Yes, C99 is on and according to B.2.18 from http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19205-01/819-5265/bjapp/index.html also casual use. What does not work is the inclusion of a static function from extern inline. It also does work if I declare bitwriter_grow_ also as "inline". Would the other patch about MIN and MAX substitution acceptable or should I add a patch with a autoc...

Hi Erik, Am 07.04.2013 um 12:25 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com>: > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Yes, C99 is on and according to B.2.18 from >> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19205-01/819-5265/bjapp/index.html >> also casual use. What does not work is the inclusion of a static function >> from extern inline. It also does work if I declare bitwriter_grow_ also >> as "inline". > > I actually think SUN/Oracle Studio is doing the wrong thing her...