search for: dwif

...s not the reason for this post. I tested by capturing with tcpdump before and after the queue. I noticed that the packets were being released in pairs, which probably doesn''t help either. I assume it is htb that calls esfq to dequeue a packet - but I don''t know. For the test my DWIFLIMIT bandwidth was set at 51kbit/s which is 10% of my bandwidth. My mtu is set at 1478 as it''s slightly more efficient for adsl using pppoa/vcmux in the UK. I used - $TC class add dev $DWIF parent 1:2 classid 1:21 htb rate $[$DWIFLIMIT/2]kbit \ ceil ${DWIFLIMIT}kbit burst 0b...

I noticed that LLD doesn’t preserve the symbol type for a defsym directive. For example: $ cat f.c void f() {} $ clang -c f.c $ ld.lld -shared --defsym=g=f f.o $ objdump -T a.out DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE: 00000000000012a0 g DF .text 0000000000000006 f 00000000000012a0 g D .text 0000000000000000 g f is marked as a function symbol, but g is not. I recognize this is hard to do in the general

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt" ><div dir="ltr" ><font face="AppleSystemUIFont" size="3" >LoopUnrollAndJamPass is currently a loop pass. It is added in a LPM with only itself.</font><br><font face="AppleSystemUIFont"

Folks, I am a little bit confuse in how to put these packets into correct mangle table for traffic shaping. This is what i ve planned to do: - - - - :eth0 [ LINUX-BOX ] eth1: - - - - Let say: eth0: 220.100.1.1 eth1: 192.168.1.1 eth1:1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.0/24 get natted into 220.100.1.1 before reaching the internet. I put every packets coming from internet (eth0) this way: # iptables -t