Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dump58".
Did you mean:
dump57
2008 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
>
>> Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable
>> (and shows the problem).
>
> I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling
> them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way
> I can get compilable IR from that?
2008 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Can you please attach IR which can be compiled
> to an executable (and shows the problem).
I've been generating functions using a builder and then
compiling them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction().
Is there some way I can get compilable IR from that?
Cheers,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/
2008 Jun 12
4
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
...li 3, 196
3020: bl trace_bytecode
3021: ori 4, 13, 7784
3022: li 3, 199
3023: addi 27, 27, 1
3024: bl trace_bytecode
3025: b BB10_166 # bci_630
4890: BB10_166: # bci_630
4891: lis 25, 3984
4892: lis 14, dump58 at ha
4893: ori 13, 25, 6556
4894: li 3, 630
4895: mr 4, 13
4896: bl trace_bytecode
4897: la 3, dump58 at l(14)
4898: mr 4, 27
4899: bl print_value
4900: lis 14, dump59 at ha
4901: li 3, 632
4902: mr...
2008 Jun 11
3
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out a weird bug I'm seeing. I'm hoping it's
something simple in my IR but I can't see anything wrong so I'm
hoping someone here can see something.
I'm using LLVM to compile Java bytecode into native functions.
My code keeps track of the Java local variables in an array of
llvm::Value pointers which get phi'd up at various points. The