search for: dump57

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dump57".

Did you mean: dump58
2008 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable >> (and shows the problem). > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way > I can get compilable IR from that?
2008 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Duncan Sands wrote: > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled > to an executable (and shows the problem). I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way I can get compilable IR from that? Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/
2008 Jun 12
4
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
...87: iload 189: iinc 192: iload 194: i2b 195: bastore 196: iinc 199: goto 630: iload local_4_419 = 1 632: iload local_5_420 = 261095424 local_4_419 = 1 -------------- next part -------------- 2646: li 3, 632 2647: mr 4, 13 2648: bl trace_bytecode 2649: lis 13, dump57 at ha 2650: la 3, dump56 at l(14) 2651: mr 4, 26 2652: bl print_value 2653: la 3, dump57 at l(13) 2654: mr 4, 27 2655: bl print_value 2656: ori 4, 21, 7712 2657: li 3, 634 2658: bl trace_bytecode 2659:...
2008 Jun 11
3
[LLVMdev] Possible miscompilation?
Hi all, I'm trying to figure out a weird bug I'm seeing. I'm hoping it's something simple in my IR but I can't see anything wrong so I'm hoping someone here can see something. I'm using LLVM to compile Java bytecode into native functions. My code keeps track of the Java local variables in an array of llvm::Value pointers which get phi'd up at various points. The