Displaying 20 results from an estimated 32110 matches for "dues".
Did you mean:
does
2019 Feb 09
2
Question about pattern matching process
Hi,
I'd like to understand the order in which patterns are searched during ISEL. In the example below, indices are searched in ascending order from 808 to 3305, then it goes back to 3259 and eventually it matches the wrong instruction. Why did go back from 3305 to 3259? In my XXXGenDAGISel.inc, I can see that the correct instruction is at index 3420 but it never got there.
ISEL: Starting
2017 Jul 08
2
Error in v64i32 type in x86 backend
Thank you. i understood how avx512 vector instructions are written in
x86instravx512. i need to define my vector instructions so i wrote;
def VMOV_256B_RM : I<0x6F, MRMSrcMem, (outs VR2048:$dst), (ins
i32mem:$src),
"vmov_256B_rm\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
[(set VR2048:$dst, (v64i32 (scalar_to_vector (loadi32
addr:$src))))],
2017 Jul 08
2
Error in v64i32 type in x86 backend
Thank you;
i have changed as follows.is it fine now?
def VADD_256B : I<0xFE, MRMDestReg, (outs VR2048:$dst), (ins VR2048:$src1,
VR2048:$src2),
"VADD_256B\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", [(set VR2048:$dst,
(add VR2048:$src1, VR2048:$src2))]]>;
Also here i have changed class RI to I. Does it make any difference?
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Craig Topper
2017 Jul 08
5
Error in v64i32 type in x86 backend
Thank You.
I have seen the opcode is 8 bits and all the combinations are already used
in llvm x86.
Now what to do?
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes its an opcode conflict. You'll have to look through Intel documents
> and find an unused opcode. I've only added instructions based on a real
> spec so I don't know
2016 Mar 15
4
view how instruction selection is happening
At one point someone showed me how to view the output of how instruction
selection is happening. The output I'm talking about is shown below. Can
someone remind me how to generate it? (I really should start writing down
stuff like this)
========================= Orignal Match Result
=====================================
Selecting: 0x2ebfa78: glue = EsenciaISD::SET_FLAG 0x2ebee18, 0x2ebef20,
2013 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] setCC and brcond
Hi there,
I am currently trying to create an LLVM Backend for a RISC architecture
and running into problems with setCC and brcond.
First a few explanations:
The architecture doesn't have a dedicated flag register, but seven
1-bit-wide so called "condition registers", c0-c6,
which can be set by e.g. a compare instruction:
> cmp ne, c0, r1, 123
It also supports conditional
2017 Jul 07
2
Error in v64i32 type in x86 backend
Have you read http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html and
http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html ?
http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html#instruction-selector
describes how to define a store instruction.
-Eli
On 7/6/2017 6:51 PM, hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev wrote:
> Please correct me i m stuck at this point.
>
> On Jul 6, 2017 5:18 PM, "hameeza ahmed"
2017 Jul 07
2
Error in v64i32 type in x86 backend
also i further run the following command;
llc -debug filer-knl_o3.ll
and its output is attached here. by looking at the output can we say that
legalization runs fine and the error is due to instruction selection/
pattern matching which is not yet implemented?
so do i need to worry and try to correct it at this stage or should i move
forward to implement instruction selection/ pattern matching?
2015 Dec 07
3
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
HI!
My server Samba 4 version 4.3.0, running since August, do not is a
problem, but my i see this messages logs every 1 minutes, any ideas?
Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: [2015/12/07 10:40:24.260707, 0]
../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet)
Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check
failed due to invalid signature!
Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux
2008 Mar 17
1
update_call_counter: Call to peer '2509' rejected due to usage limit of 1?
Hi,
I am using asterisk-1.4.15, My sip configs is like
[2501]
type=friend
username=2501
secret=2501
canreinvite=no
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=rfc2833
context = sip
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
incominglimit=1
nat=1
queue.conf is like
[gen-enq]
joinempty = yes
musiconhold = default
strategy = rrmemory
servicelevel = 60
timeout = 60
retry = 5
wrapuptime=5
announce-frequency = 90
announce-holdtime = yes
2012 Feb 29
2
Guests pausing suddenly
We have a CentOS 6.2 server with KVM. That server hosts 2 virtual
machines, both with Centos 6.2, too.
Regularly, one or both of the virtual machines pass to state "pause"
without apparent reason.
On resume, I do get have messages, like the following in /var/log/messages.
Feb 28 21:50:45 achernar fcoemon: Failed to connect to lldpad
Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda]
2006 Aug 29
1
Tasks get executed twice with repeat_every
I have a simple worker that I set up with repeat_every:
class DueNoteQueuerWorker < BackgrounDRb::Rails
repeat_every 1.minutes
first_run Time.now
def do_work(args)
@logger.debug("Sending due notes. The current time is #{Time.now}")
end
end
I want this to run every minute, all the time. The first run is fine,
but it seems that subsequent runs get executed
2006 Mar 31
4
IAX: Auto-congesting call due to slow response
Hi,
I have a IAX2 trunk between two sites (connected with an high bandwidth
link) but sometime/often I get:
chan_iax2.c: Auto-congesting call due to slow response
and call is dropped (and routed on a PSTN link).
In iax.conf, I have:
[iax-out]
username=iax-in
type=peer
trunk=yes
secret=xxxxxxxxxxx
qualify=yes
host=xxx.yyy.zzz.32
auth=md5
Any idea? Perpaphs is due to
2016 Feb 19
3
Failure to match a DAG after a minor pattern change in a custom Target
In an attempt to add vector registers to my target, I ran into a problem.
LLVM started to complain about not being able to infer types from the
provided DAG patterns for several classes of instructions. After a
discussion on the llvm-dev mailing list and IRC channel the recommendation
was to make DAG patterns for these classes of instructions more specific.
Which is what was done. However after
2015 Dec 09
2
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
hehehe
Thank you for your attention.
Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be
presented here.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
Application patch, exemple....
Bye!!
Em 09-12-2015 12:11, L.P.H. van Belle escreveu:
> Sorry none..
>
> I suggest first upgrade to the latest 4.3.x
> If it is still there, post again, but with some
2013 Mar 12
2
Bugs due to naive copying of list elements
Several bugs are present in R-2.15.3 and R-alpha due to
naive copying of list elements.
The bug below is due to naive copying in subset.c (with
similar bugs for matrices and arrays):
a<-list(c(1,2),c(3,4),c(5,6))
b<-a[2:3]
a[[2]][2]<-9
print(b[[1]][2])
Naive copying in mapply.c leads to the following bug:
X<-1+1
f<-function(a,b) X
A<-mapply(f,c(1,2,3),c(4,5,6),SIMPLIFY=FALSE)
2023 Sep 02
1
Fails to install Rfast package
Hi,
I was trying to install Rfast package in iMac (OS HIGH SIERRA) from
source. However the installation fails with below message.
Rfast is an essential package for various other packages in R
Could you please help how to resolve this error?
Thankss for your help
> install.packages("/Volumes/WDStorage/NAS Download/Rfast_2.0.8.tar.gz", repos = NULL)
* installing *source* package
2015 Dec 09
2
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki?
Thanks
Em 09-12-2015 13:47, Reindl Harald escreveu:
>
> Am 09.12.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha:
>> hehehe
>> Thank you for your attention.
>> Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be
>> presented here.
>>
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
2016 Oct 04
0
Fwd: Winbind Preauthentication failed
Hi guys!
I started to have the problem above last October, 2th.
I donĀ“t know why and how, because it was saturday. So, my file server
stoped to authenticate against the Samba4 AD.
Today, all shares was stopped and then i restarted my Samba4 AD and the
file server.
All became to work again.
But it im afraid because the problem started by itself.
Thanks!
# MY CRONTAB
17 * * * * root cd /
2016 Jun 28
2
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA
> On Jun 27, 2016, at 12:25 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello ,
>
> To solve this bug locally I have given preference to tail call optimization over local function related optimization in IPRA. I have added following method to achieve this:
>
> bool isEligibleForTailCallOptimization(Function *F) {
> CallingConv::ID CC =