search for: dually

...e same "access denied" problem. If I view permissions on the share or contained files I can see that both my username & group have full permissions. The only error that I'm getting in the log (log.machinename) is: [2002/05/25 16:48:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(251) dually (10.0.1.242) couldn't find service ilkof The odd thing is that the share is called "ilkoff" but the final letter is being missed off. Is this just a logging problem or could this be a bug in Samba/Winbind? If anyone has any suggestions/pointers please let me know because I'm so...

has anyone come across a wine 1.1.10 RPM? Searching all the usual places..... d

...me via Python code that works under both 2.x and 3.x (I'm assuming nobody wants a flag day). From my personal experience, I can unequivocally say that writing Python that works on both major versions is much easier the closer the Python 2 release is to 3. In other words, It's much easier to dually support Python 2.7 and 3.x than it is 2.5 and 3.x. I feel the level of pain is pretty bad until you get to Python 2.6. Even then, there are dozens of small bugs in Python 2.6 and even earlier releases of Python 2.7 until 2.7.3 that make dual support difficult (especially in the area of Unicode hand...

...f SIG members KB, JH: Developing Build Systems, Other Infrastructure enablement, CentOS Board liasion LK: Minutes, Chair meetings, Outreach, Community GD: Access Controls, Build triggers, Technical Leadership * ACTION: LK and GD to discuss who wants to act as SIG lead. We may want to run this dually for a while, until it is clearer what is involved. LK is often on the road, which may prove challenging. === Decision Making === Lazy Consenus decision making process (amongst the SIG members). In other words, proposals are made on the list and accepted if there is no veto. === Ongoing busine...

...> works under both 2.x and 3.x (I'm assuming nobody wants a flag day). > From my personal experience, I can unequivocally say that writing > Python that works on both major versions is much easier the closer the > Python 2 release is to 3. In other words, It's much easier to dually > support Python 2.7 and 3.x than it is 2.5 and 3.x. I feel the level of > pain is pretty bad until you get to Python 2.6. Even then, there are > dozens of small bugs in Python 2.6 and even earlier releases of Python > 2.7 until 2.7.3 that make dual support difficult (especially in...

...ograms (of course, PRs would be welcome to add such changes to the upstream library to be included in future releases). In fact, the few differences for the core driver are hidden by `ifdef` (so there are two binary builds, with built-in mappings and with DMF support), and the `nut-scanner` tool is dually-capable in the same build. In fact, to test the theory, NUT codebase in the branch provides scripts that convert `*-mib.c` tables into equivalent DMF XML files, so a copy of `snmp-ups-dmf` driver program with the bunch of text resource files is equivalent out of the box to a monolithic `snmp-ups` b...

...Rs would be welcome to add such changes to the > upstream library to be included in future releases). In fact, the few > differences for the core driver are hidden by `ifdef` (so there are two > binary builds, with built-in mappings and with DMF support), and the > `nut-scanner` tool is dually-capable in the same build. In fact, to test > the theory, NUT codebase in the branch provides scripts that convert > `*-mib.c` tables into equivalent DMF XML files, so a copy of `snmp-ups-dmf` > driver program with the bunch of text resource files is equivalent out of > the box to a mon...

Hello, I found out about NUT just days ago while searching for a solution for my home setup. After some digging through the interwebs, I come to you with questions. I'm putting together a DIY 12V UPS, very similar to what this guy did: [1] https://baldpenguin.blogspot.com/2015/10/diy-12v-ups-for-home-network-equipment.html The objective is to keep a bunch of mini PCs and network gear