search for: drpms

We are having issues with drpms on CentOS-6 i386 and x86_64 and on CentOS-7 x86_64. The technical issues sometimes cause us to have to rebuild all drpms over again .. and the time involved is very large.? Also storing the drpms and moving them around takes up a lot of space and bandwidth. We would like to remove delta rpms (drp...

...ice new 6.4 tree (thanks!!!) I see there are already a few updates. eg Packages/firefox-17.0.3-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm Packages/firefox-17.0.3-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm So far, so normal. These occur because of timing. That's not a problem; it's expected. What confuses me, though, is the drpms directory where there are 33 firefox drpm files compared to the 2 Packages, including firefox-3 versions! The drpms directory is around 3.3G whereas the Packages directory is only 680M. Is the drpms directory carrying legacy files? Or is this to be expected? -- rgds Stephen

...ole rpm, avoiding the issue. > > setting > deltarpm=0 > in /etc/yum.conf is an equivalent workaround, and fixed the issue for me. > > I?d appreciate someone who knows more about how delta rpms work weighing in on what the actual issue is. > Not sure what happened with the drpms, but I will regenerate all the polkit drpms with the upcoming ghostscript release later this morning. I added drpm tests to our pre-release CI tests as well. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 19...

> We would like to remove delta rpms (drpms) from our CentOS-6 and > CentOS-7 repositories. > I live on fast connections both at home and work and for me I see no real advantage to delta RPMs - I've not really measured it, but it seems like my systems spend more time reconstructing the RPMs than they ever did downloading things....

Hi list, Sorry for the exclude question... but I have been trying for hours to get this to work and am utterly baffled. I'm performing an archive transfer between hosts and wish to include anything in any directory named 'debug' or 'drpms' at any depth. I assumed this would be as simple as --exclude 'debug/***' --exclude 'drpms/***' but I still get files retrieved. Full option list is: rsync -aHi --no-o --delay-updates --delete --delete-excluded --delete- after --exclude 'drpms/***' --exclude 'd...

Has anybody successfully implemented DRPMs on centos 5.x? I searched the net and I found a few indications that it is possible, but there is very little info how to do it. Just to be clear. With DRPMs i mean deltaRPMs. And with implementation i mean What yum plugins are necessary and what has to be done on the yum repository to make it wor...

...t; >> setting >> deltarpm=0 >> in /etc/yum.conf is an equivalent workaround, and fixed the issue for me. >> >> I?d appreciate someone who knows more about how delta rpms work weighing in on what the actual issue is. >> > > Not sure what happened with the drpms, but I will regenerate all the > polkit drpms with the upcoming ghostscript release later this morning. > > I added drpm tests to our pre-release CI tests as well. > This is not the first time we have had issues with drpms in the update tree. Would anyone be opposed to taking away d...

On 3/25/19 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > This is not the first time we have had issues with drpms in the update tree. > Would anyone be opposed to taking away deltarpms from the repositories? > > They take up lots of space and they have cause multiple issues in the past. > > Thoughts? Due to the disk churn deltarpms need and our own internal mirroring of centos packages, one of...

...for some time. I suppose, at this point I could just delete the 5.3 update directory and rsync the 5.4 directory... But how large is the 5.4 update directory? Oh, just for i386, without /debug and is there anything else I should not include? For example for my FC11 update repo I also exclude drpms.

Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into this set of errors: ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Updating: polkit x86_64 0.112-18.el7_6.1

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0230 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0230 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 491b63a51365bb112538c3cc527cc9a0f9cbb8599989268b2367a88b6923e39d polkit-0.112-18.el7_6.1.i686.rpm

Hi all, My goal is to have PHP 5.2.x on a centos virtual machine (LXC) Looking at the repositories: - 6.2 has php 5.3: ftp://ftp.free.fr/mirrors/ftp.centos.org/6.2/updates/i386/drpms/ - 5.7 has php 5.1 ftp://ftp.free.fr/mirrors/ftp.centos.org/5.7/updates/i386/RPMS/ I'll have to rebuild a source RPM in order to have what I want: - Which base should I install for a php 5.2 VM? 6.2 or 5.7? - Which release of CentOS had a php 5.2 source rpm that I could just rebuild without...

...85d69cc8-8870-601f-ce10-7b0caf50d20b at hughesjr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Please Note: This is a reissue of this notice with updated sha256sums as the original release had drpm and metadata issues and we had to re-sign and re-release the original RPMs to get the drpms to work correctly. Thanks, Johnny Hughes On 4/17/19 11:57 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0230 Important > > Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0230 > > The following updated files have been uploaded and are...