search for: doubtless

I'm in conversation with Draytek's pre-sales dept.............. Here's the most recent reply: <Hello, We really don't know of anyone who has run an Asterisk server on a Vigor2900. There are doubtless people around, but it's relatively rare. Most people don't run SIP servers. Regards,> All I want to know is, if I buy one of these routers, will it break my setup or not - ie. assuming I set up the relevant port-forwarding, can I expect any one-way audio issues. Can't get a definit...

My apologies for asking what is doubtless a dumb question, but I have scant experience in R. It would be very convenient in doing lots of plots to be able to do them in a loop that stepped through a vector of variable names. For example one could say x<-("mydates") y<-c("foo1","foo2","foo3"...

Greetings, I need to develop a way to manage the installation and update of R packages under linux (CentOS), hopefully using Puppet. I''ve got most of the rest of hodge-podge of install scripts and maintenance scripts translated into Puppet and need to tackle this beast now. R is a programming language for statistics, basically, and has a few jillion add on package libraries, very much

...ximately, i.e., based on the 24 months I've got, I want to be able to tell someone: "the 12 months after this will probably average about $number of events per month." Assuming I'm able to navigate R with a minimum degree of proficiency, where would I start with this? As you can doubtless tell, I'm not looking for anything sophisticated - just a reasonable estimate. Am I going to be able to do better than a projected per-month guess based on $total/$number_of_months? Thanks very much - _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trus...

...security. I've used the ACL patch from acl.bestbits.at on ext3 & love it dearly except for the quota issues. Despite those issues I absolutely could not live without ACL's on large file servers with a few hundred or thousand users. I understand and respect the fact that the ext3 team doubtless has many other concerns, and I am able to make due with kernel patches fine. I am interested more in long range plans; perhaps through a 3 way convergence between the Posix ACL team, the XFS team, and the ext3 team. Forgive me if this if off topic, or inappropriate in any way, but I thought this m...

...ways I can solve this myself, but neither are both are a bit more complex than the context requires (e.g. exercises for an undergraduate class). I can use gsub from the command line to remove the apostrophes, or i can import the data file without using value labels as factor levels and that would doubtless work. But the technical documentation for the CES is very poor; my students would have to end up opening up the original .sav file in PASW and hunt down what the underlying factor levels refer to in that instance. Is there a solution within R Commander? Yours, Simon Kiss ***********************...

...") system.time( rep <- gsub("[[:space:]]", "-", line) ) } gives rather long times rising v sharply for big strings (eg 2.2s at n=2e4, 360s at n=2e5 on AMD 1.2GHz). Other languages aren't so slow on this task (eg n=2e5: 0.4s ruby 1.8.1, and 5.2s python 2). Doubtless my extremely-quick-hack benchmarks aren't fair, but the difference still seems rather big. Mark <><

...ake some folks happy. :) Sure, but who will answer mine? Part of the reason I asked about this was selfish, as I'd like access to other people in the same situation as me who might know answers. (I don't think the people here now will want to answer more questions, and many of my questions doubtless border on inanely stupid but for the fact that it is hard to find answers in the docs.) That said, I'm willing to give it a try, as an experiment. How long should we attempt it for? If that's reasonably agreed to, I'll personally give it a good faith effort myself during the period. (I...

Hi, yesterday evening I tried to upgrade my Ultra 60 to 2009.06 from SXCE snv_98. I can''t use AI Installer because OpenPROM is version 3.27. So I built IPS from source, then created a zpool on a spare drive and installed OS 2006.06 on it To make the disk bootable I used: installboot -F zfs /usr/platform/`uname -i`/lib/fs/zfs/bootblk /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s0 using the executable from my new

...I should keep using SPSS, or try something else. The types of analysis I’ll typically will have to do will involve comparing measurements at different times, e.g. before/ after treatment. I’ll also need to compare groups of people, e.g. treatment / no treatment. Regression and factor analyses will doubtless come into it at some point too. So: 1. should I use R or try something else? 2. can anyone advise me on using R with the type of data I’ve described? Many thanks, Anton du Toit [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...o that that software, with whatever vulnerabilities or weaknesses it might have, remained locked down and could not relay, if at all possible. (Imaps with passwords means the login details are not transmitted in cleartext and, so, leak no security to an observer of the communications channel. Doubtless there are other weaknesses somewhere but, at least, when using hotel wifi, for example, there is little chance of revealing login details to a packet sniffer. It won't be perfect, there are probably other vulnerabilities, not least in the underlying OSs at each end, but the connection - wh...

...compiler (I think - will check). Thus a newly built C compiler is always available to build later stages. We can't reasonably require everyone to build the C++ compiler (I often don't - it speeds up the build considerably). So we would need some new logic to handle this situation. It can doubtless be done, but hasn't been done - mucking with the gcc build system can be quite an adventure! Ciao, Duncan.

...ust(h, horiz = TRUE) : "horiz" is not a graphical parameter 3: In title(main = main, sub = sub, xlab = xlab, ylab = ylab, ...) : "horiz" is not a graphical parameter --------------------------------------------------------------- I would appreciate help solving this problem. Doubtless there is a simple answer. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Duncan, I am confused. Shouldn't the gcc 4.2 front-end build behave just like the FSF gcc build. The first stage builds the compilers and the second stage rebuilds them using those from the first stage? Jack On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:56:23PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > > I don't be that can be the cause because I have... > > > >

...1 1 1 2004-12-18 2004-12-25 2005-01-01 2005-01-08 2005-01-15 2005-01-22 1 1 1 1 1 1 2005-01-29 2005-02-05 2005-02-12 2005-02-19 2005-02-26 2005-03-05 1 1 1 1 1 1 > Doubtless it's some facile error that will make me feel sheepish, but I've been staring at this for a bit now and just getting nowhere. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Andrew

With the increased traffic as of late, I'm wondering if it is time to split the list again. Specifically I am wondering if it should be split along the various VoIP protocols and zap hardware, then leave a general list that does configuration other than VoIP related? The hope is that those asking SIP or H323 questions could get help from the various supporters while the main list can deal

Dear R users; I am using R for a project. I have some PHP forms that pass parameters to R for calculations, and publish the result in HTML format by CGIwithR. I'm using a Linux machine and every things work perfectly. However, it is too slow, it takes 5 to 10 seconds to run, and even if I start R from the Shell it takes the same amount of time, which is probably due to installing packages.

...separately >> already - the only benefit to testing particular IR->object & >> separately testing particular IR->assembly is probably not worthwhile. > > I cite PR13303/PR14524, where asm and direct-object output differ. > This came up early in my LLVM career and has doubtless poisoned my > outlook for life.... > > In many cases I think the same test _source_ can be used to check both > asm and object, with appropriate RUN lines, and whether you want to > count that as the same or separate depends on how you like to game the > counts. What matters to m...

...emission to be tested separately > already - the only benefit to testing particular IR->object & > separately testing particular IR->assembly is probably not worthwhile. I cite PR13303/PR14524, where asm and direct-object output differ. This came up early in my LLVM career and has doubtless poisoned my outlook for life.... In many cases I think the same test _source_ can be used to check both asm and object, with appropriate RUN lines, and whether you want to count that as the same or separate depends on how you like to game the counts. What matters to me is both paths get tested....

...dding it if not. Testsuite results are as follows: (a) "make check" has two failures: ARM/cse-libcalls.ll - this is because of a bug in UpdateNodeOperands which does not do CSE on calls correctly. The question here is how best to fix this while minimizing code duplication. This will doubtless be fixed soon. PowerPC/vec_spat.ll (@splat_h) - here code got slightly worse. The problem here is that LegalizeDAG "cheats": it constructs a BUILD_VECTOR where the type of the operands doesn't match the vector element type (this is supposed to be illegal), while LegalizeTypes corre...