search for: dosfsck

I have an application with 15 migrations under version control. In a Mac and and in a Windows, a rake migrate from scratch runs them all just fine. But in a different Windows machine rake migrate stops after migration 3 for no apparent reason. --trace seems normal. No error is reported. Both Windows are XP SP2. They all have the same svn revision and Rails-related software, database is

This is a fsck log of my computer ,everytime when boot the system show this things, what's the problem? And how can I cancel it when system boot? Log of fsck -C -R -A -a Sun Oct 14 21:00:34 2007 fsck 1.40.2 (12-Jul-2007) dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN /dev/hdb1: 18222 files, 425355/1053230 clusters dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN /dev/hdb10: 22 files, 571488/1248831 clusters dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN There are differences between boot sector and its backup. Differences: (offset:original/backup) 5...

Hi! When I started Wine (some Jan. 2001 version), it moved some directories from my windows partition, renamed them and made them write-protected. As I ran down Linux and restarted Windows, the moved directories still were there. I had to rename them and to move them back. How can I tell Wine not to mess up my windows directory structure? Thanx Stefan

...e of FreeDOS, also require different versions of kernel.sys.) 3) newmkfloppyimg.sh doesn't show the output from mkdosfs, so you won't know whether the file system changed. 4) After-the-fact, you can determine whether two images have the same underlying file system type by running "dosfsck -V imgfile" and looking for the number in front of "bit entries". 5) Or look inside newmkfloppyimg.sh and run mkdosfs manually to look at all the output for clues as to what was created. 6) To eliminate a change in filesystem, you can change the parameters that newmkfloppyimg.sh...

...-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7360 31. Mai 2003 blockdev -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 47944 31. Mai 2003 cfdisk [... normal entries salvaged] -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 413 29. Mai 2002 fsck.nfs lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 20. Feb 2003 fsck.vfat -> dosfsck ?rwxrw-rwt 13639 21845 18754 23 27. J� 1994 genksyms -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14184 31. Mai 2003 getty -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 121032 16. Apr 2003 grub -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2944 16. Apr 2003 grub-floppy -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1...

...fferent versions of kernel.sys.) > > 3) newmkfloppyimg.sh doesn't show the output from mkdosfs, so you won't > know whether the file system changed. > > 4) After-the-fact, you can determine whether two images have the same > underlying file system type by running "dosfsck -V imgfile" and looking > for the number in front of "bit entries". > > 5) Or look inside newmkfloppyimg.sh and run mkdosfs manually to look at > all the output for clues as to what was created. > > 6) To eliminate a change in filesystem, you can change the para...

On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:54, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >On 07/08/2014 11:26 AM, Ady wrote: >> >> It's interesting that you ask this, because every document related to >> newmkfloppyimg.sh specifically recommends adding: >> floppy c=$CYLINDERS s=$SECTORS h=$HEADS >> to the MEMDISK arguments. >> > >It would be important for floppies to know

...m Debian. The other computer is a much newer AMD Athlon64 HP laptop with USB2.0 port and SuSE 10.2. Did anyone observe anything similar with any USB flash drives (FAT OK, ext3 corrupted)? I've put files on these disks on FAT32 and run fsck.vfat, and everything looks fine: root at tarnica:~# dosfsck -v /dev/sda1 dosfsck 2.11 (12 Mar 2005) dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN Checking we can access the last sector of the filesystem Boot sector contents: System ID "mkdosfs" Media byte 0xf8 (hard disk) 512 bytes per logical sector 4096 bytes per cluster 32 reserved...

My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? mark