search for: dokey

Okay dokey, thanks :) On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a >> bug? > > I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly.

Okey dokey. I'll start setting things up. I think what I'll do is start with 1.1 (or the infamous and soon-to-be-released 1.2 :). Once that works, I'll probably put together a CVS snapshot version. I know LLVM currently supports ia32 and SPARC; is anyone looking at any other architectures? On...

...atch. Some questions and commons: > > 1. Have you test it against the llvm test suite? No not yet. > Does it work if fp > elimination optimization is turned off? For my test cases - yes. > 2. Please follow llvm coding convention and make sure every line fits > in 80 columns. Okay dokey. i was looking through the files manually - must have missed some - sorry. > 3. > enum NameDecorationStyle { > None, > StdCall, > - FastCall > + FastCall, > + FastCC // the normal fastcc calling convention > }; > > Why is FastCC necessary? Can't you ju...

I think the build should work now, could you try? You need both llvm and llvm-gcc. There are still codegen issues, but I don't think they'll affect code that doesn't use long double. On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Okay dokey, thanks :) > On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a >>> bug? >> >> I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly. > ________________________________________...

...hink the build should work now, could you try? You need both > llvm and llvm-gcc. > There are still codegen issues, but I don't think they'll affect > code that > doesn't use long double. > > On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > >> Okay dokey, thanks :) >> On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>>> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i >>>> file a >>>> bug? >>> >>> I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly. >&g...

...row.names<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, value = c("1", "new", "new" : duplicate 'row.names' are not allowed Calls: <Anonymous> ... rownames<- -> row.names<- -> row.names<-.data.frame Execution halted ----------------- yet everything is okey dokey at http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/2.7/bioc-LATEST/#S under the snpMatrix entry. I believe it might be a bug in codetools::incLocalSrcInfo (used by "R CMD check") and here is what I think the fix(?) - but I am not entirely sure what that routine does and why other package writers ha...

I''ve upgraded to Rails 1.1.2, and I''m trying to push this change through to our build server (Linux/Oracle) and we are getting some errors in the unit tests using Oracle. Looking at the data in the tests reveals a precision problem. Looking at the tables tells the whole story. My development database contains this table: SQL> describe dls_grids; Name

Hi Arnold, Thanks for the patch. Some questions and commons: 1. Have you test it against the llvm test suite? Does it work if fp elimination optimization is turned off? 2. Please follow llvm coding convention and make sure every line fits in 80 columns. 3. enum NameDecorationStyle { None, StdCall, - FastCall + FastCall, + FastCC // the normal fastcc calling convention }; Why is

Hi Evan, first off thanks to you and Chris for taking time. On 6 Sep 2007, at 00:57, Evan Cheng wrote: > We'd like to see tail call optimization to be similar to the target > independent lowering of ISD::CALL nodes. These are auto-generated > from ???CallingConv.td files. Some target specific details such as > function address register (ECX in your example) should be coded in

I''ve moved the remaining HTML files (including those that Mike and Paul are working on) to a new project named Shorewall-Website. This will segregate the Docbook documentation from the Website-only HTML files. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

...39;re > > right, it does look broken. I just had a conversation on IRC that > > revealed that the Oracle schema dumper also doesn''t handle boolean > > (i.e. NUMBER(1)) columns properly. > > > > Sounds like it''s time for a ticket. > > Okey, dokey. I''ll see about posting an example. Thanks for > confirming. Looks to me like there''s actually two problems. First, although there''s a ''limit'' method, there''s no ''scale'' method for ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::Orac...

...id.Collier-Brown@Sun.COM; samba-technical@samba.org; > samba@samba.org > Subject: Re: FUD or foolishness? Windows XP Home and Samba > > > Is that your experience with the "simple file sharing"? Or does XP Home > have another protocol that can be installed that works Okey-dokey with > other Windows machines? > I just can't believe that M$ would completely abandon compatibility > with other Windows machines. It's more likely (to me) that they > renamed all the protocols (in an attempt at marketing cuteness) and > there's something extra that you...

What's the delay? Greetings, Aleksandar --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.

On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Al Stone wrote: > Would anyone mind terribly if I tried to get LLVM packaged and added to > the Debian distribution? Definitely not! Please do. :) Note that we have experimental support for RPM generation in CVS currently, which might give you a starting point to look at. If you have any questions or run into any problems, please just let us know! What version

Would anyone mind terribly if I tried to get LLVM packaged and added to the Debian distribution? -- Ciao, al ---------------------------- Al Stone Linux & Open Source Lab Hewlett-Packard Company E-mail: ahs3 at fc.hp.com ----------------------------

..., could you try? You need both >> llvm and llvm-gcc. >> There are still codegen issues, but I don't think they'll affect >> code that >> doesn't use long double. >> >> On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: >> >>> Okay dokey, thanks :) >>> On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>>>> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i >>>>> file a >>>>> bug? >>>> >>>> I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it...

On Sep 19, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Hi all, > building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT(Revision: 42128) with current llvm > (Revision: 42128) on 8.10.1 Darwin (x86) fails with the following > message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a > bug? I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly. >

...ned > CalleeCC) > + const { > > Having "const {" on a separate line looks funky. :-) > will change ;) > Please remove code that's commented out. > if( G ==> if (G :-) > No need to set IsEligible to false since it's initialized to false. > ;) okay dokey regards

Steven Vaughan-Nichols at Ziff-Davis said: | Unlike all other previous Microsoft operating systems, XP | Home will simply not work in an office network environment | with NetWare, NT, Samba, or Windows 2000 servers. Period. | You simply can't connect to the servers' domains or their | file/print services. Which sounds like they took the SMB client out... | XP Home also has a built-in

Hi all, building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT(Revision: 42128) with current llvm (Revision: 42128) on 8.10.1 Darwin (x86) fails with the following message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a bug? /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/ arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/