search for: dodds

Hello all, Running the "ancient" 1.4.7-RC1 version I have a problem with port forwarding. I have for a number of external fixed IP addresses forwarding to an internal terminal server - this works :-) DNAT net:111.22.33.44 loc:192.168.1.11 tcp 3389 DNAT net:222.33.44.55 loc:192.168.1.11 tcp 3389 Now I need to forward port 80 from one external address to an

Hi everyone, Sorry for asking OT here, but I need your expertise :-) I am running a standard 3 I/F net, dmz, loc Shorewall 1.4.7 on a RH 9 server In the DMZ I have a web shop running with DNAT from the external address to the DMZ - this all works I want to add a develop server in the DMZ with external access so I set this up as per the live server and from internal network it works, but from

Hello Darren, Could you comment on this issue being raised by myself and Corinna Vinschen? This will create big problems for me. I'm not clear if this is a conscious decision supported by solid reasons or if it is just collateral damage. Thank you for all you work! Jack DoDDs -------- Original Message -------- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:31:03 +0200 Subject: Re: Announce: OpenSSH 7.5 released From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat.com> To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org On Mar 24 12:38, Jack Dodds wrote: > Hello, > > You seem to be saying that in 7...

Hello shorewall-users, we have a strange problem where some of our customers cannot access our webshop, but most of the customers can. I have been slowly eliminating possibilities and am now left with either the firewall (Shorewall 1.4) or the webshop server. What appears a lot in the logfiles is: Jul 26 11:51:04 gw kernel: Shorewall:logdrop:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT=eth1 SRC=84.128.198.240

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1927 Matthew N. Dodd <matthew.nygard.dodd at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2076|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #1 from Matthew N. Dodd

> I ran testparm and got: name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast > > When I put the workstation netbios name in /etc/hosts smbmount works as > advertised, but it seems to ignore /etc/lmhosts > > How can I identify samba's root from an RPM installation? > > > Graham > > -----Original Message----- > From: Maurice Lefebvre

Hi, I am trying to determine the correct LDAP schema I need to use to have either mailLocation or mailboxPath available ? Should I be just adding this to one of my own custom objectClasses ? -- Dave

Dear list, I am looking for some help with the format of extracted residual values output from: residuals (model1) [1] 0.74140534 0.72464895 0.74873373 0.78313611 0.78836470 0.76934676 0.77448847 0.78465077 0.79278282 [10] 0.80852056 0.81442047 0.80890838 0.78335232 0.83127343 0.85895985 0.85743700 0.83578769 0.82265972 [19] 0.81611939 0.84459841 0.84346431 0.83469399 0.86057807

Hi, guys, I got the below error message when i typed this command in terminal "rackup config.ru" , the file config.ru is rails ''s configuration file. You have already activated rack 1.3.2, but your Gemfile requires rack 1.2.3. Consider using bundle exec. (Gem::LoadError) So, how should i do , thanks a lot. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Hello @R-devel I needed some statistical functions for a project I was working on in Rust, and I've used the R math library as a standalone solution. I thought the R developers would be interested in the fact that their work is being used elsewhere, and I also wanted to say thanks for some code I do NOT want to have to write myself! The "crate" (Rust's name for a package) is at

I am faced with a network that needs to autoswitch to isdn should T-1 go down. After a shorewall search it looks to be quite a deal with routing config with linux. Like scripts written to deal with knowing the T-1 is down. I looked into a cisco router that does this. around $3000 This network has used shorewall as the gateway for 4 years now. Currently Fedora as op. system. It appears to me

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1326 Summary: Allow non-public-key credentials in authorized_keys file (Kerberos, etc.) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Kerberos support

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1927 Matthew N. Dodd <matthew.nygard.dodd at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|5.8p2 |-current -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Hello all, I''m setting up (for the first time) IPsec and have a question I need to allow another location access to a specific server in our local network, and deny access to all other servers I have followed Tom''s IPsec tunnel guide and setup a vpn zone, but I don''t want to allow all traffic in both directions so I haven''t added a general policy for vpn.

Hello shorewall-users, now that I''ve got v1.4 problems solved I''d just like to ask a general question. Are there any real benefits to upgrading if v1.4 does what I want ? I''m not a fan of bleeding-edge in production and I don''t go for "v2 must be better than v1 because it''s newer" Tom, if you have a few minutes, what''s new in 2.0

Hi! How are you executing dovecot-lda? I can get 'MAILER-DAEMON' if I omit -f sender-address-here parameter. Aki > On 14 September 2018 at 08:46 David Dodd <dave at ci.com.au> wrote: > > > To get out of the problem this bug was causing I have now downgraded the > affectect servers to using dovecot 2.2.36 & dovecot-pigeonhole 0.4.24 . > > These versions

Can you provide some instructions on how to reproduce this issue, because I wasn't able to. Aki > On 17 September 2018 at 01:28 David Dodd <dave at ci.com.au> wrote: > > > You are correct, omitting the -f option results in the From being set to > MAILER-DAEMON however dovecot-lda is being executed with the -d and the -f > option by my sendmail. > > In my

Hi all; I'm using samba 3.2 with smbldap-tools ( not ldapsam:*, but dosen't works too ), until that i work with centos 4 and debian etch's samba, I always set the same configuration and works fine, but with debian lenny ( 3.2.5 ) i getting problems with privileges, and i set one user ( "administrator" ) with all privileges this user can't open gpedit.msc ou change

Hi I have a PDC with an LDAP backend that i want to use SWAT to give users the option to change their password via the web interface. I cant seem to be able to get SWAT to authenticate any users it always gives me an authorization error. Is swat with an LDAP backend supported? Cheers. David.

Gives GSSAPI-MIC the same options capability currently provided for public key logins by the AuthorizedKeysFile. Uses krb5_principal_match() to support widcard matches. Uses percent_expand() to expand tokens for: credential USER[/INSTANCE]@REALM homedir /home/user username user cred name USER cred instance INSTANCE cred realm REALM My intended application: # cat